23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia<br />

K: Krstic here.<br />

O: How are you General, sir?<br />

K: I’m great, and you?<br />

O: Thanks to you I am too.<br />

K: Way to go, Chief. And how’s you’re health?<br />

O: It’s fi ne, thank God, it’s fi ne.<br />

K: Are you working down there?<br />

O: Of course we’re working.<br />

K: Good.<br />

O: We’ve managed to catch a few more, either by gunpoint or in mines.<br />

K: Killed them all. God damn it.<br />

O: Everything, everything is going according to plan. Yes.<br />

K: (sic) Single one must be left alive.<br />

O: Everything is going according to plan. Everything.<br />

K: Way to go, Chief. The Turks are probably listening to us. Let them listen, the<br />

motherfuckers.<br />

O: Yeah, let them. 130<br />

While the value of the intercept for the trial remained contentious, the<br />

Krstic judgement clearly affi rms the participation of Obrenovic and his<br />

unit in the massacres at Srebrenica, e.g. the role the Zvornik Brigade had in<br />

detaining, executing and burying the Bosnian Muslim men. 131 The judgement<br />

also quotes from an intercepted conversation between Bosnian Serb<br />

army offi cers to illustrate the level of involvement of Bosnian Serb army<br />

units in this operation. The duty offi cer of Obrenovic’s unit states in the<br />

conversation that “Obrenovic is really engaged to the maximum.” 132<br />

Vidoje Blagojevic is the third army offi cer indicted in the Srebrenica context<br />

for the crime of genocide. 133 According to the indictment, Blagojevic<br />

the whole tape was forged, the Prosecution presented the member of the Bosnian Muslim<br />

army who had intercepted the conversation in question. The Trial Chamber ultimately<br />

did not allow the recording to be entered into evidence. However, this was only due to<br />

procedural reasons so that the Prosecution may try to utilize this tape again in the Obrenovic<br />

case. Cf. Prosecutor v. Krstic, Decision on the Defence Motions to Exclude Exhibits in<br />

Rebuttal and Motion for Continuance, 4 May 2001, paras. 1-26.<br />

131 Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic (supra note 126), para. 225. Also see paras. 232, 383ff and 623.<br />

132 Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic (supra note 126), para. 383.<br />

133 Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojevic, Initial Indictment of 9 April 2001, confi dential until its un-<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!