23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Torben Jørgensen<br />

received extensive economic and military support from the USA, ending<br />

with membership of NATO in 1952. During the Cold War the role played<br />

by Turkey was important for the US which was in need of military bases<br />

and listening posts along the Turkish-Soviet border. Turkey, however, was<br />

sensitive to possible criticism concerning its incorporation into NATO. The<br />

publication in 1953 of the Turkish historian Esad Uras’ book on the Armenian<br />

question is therefore probably to be seen as an attempt to anticipate<br />

criticism. 30 As a result of the Holocaust, such criticism had become more<br />

likely since the attention of the whole world had thereby been drawn to<br />

the problem of genocide. Uras’ book was able to provide suitable answers<br />

to unpleasant questions put to Turkish diplomats in the West. It had also<br />

become important to make the most of the growing anticommunism and<br />

the rising interest in the US in seeking Turkey’s friendship as a part of the<br />

Cold War strategy. It is hardly a coincidence that Uras several times says<br />

that the weapons that the Turkish troops confi scated from the Armenians<br />

in 1915 were “made in the Soviet Union”. 31 This book was the fi rst attempt<br />

after the establishment of the republic, to directly use the Armenians as its<br />

theme and therefore had considerable infl uence.<br />

Uras stresses that the Armenians had never had a proper state. They had<br />

always stood in a relation of inferiority to other powers. Uras uses a special<br />

methodical argumentation. He comments on several early Armenian<br />

historians who to a great extent used oral myths and traditions. 32 Uras<br />

raises questions regarding the validity of the whole of Armenian history<br />

by presenting the most easily criticisable assertions of these historians, the<br />

false premise of course being that it is impossible to reconstruct Armenian<br />

history solely on the basis of the work of Armenian historians. It is also<br />

necessary to include for example Roman, Greek and other classic histori-<br />

30 Esad Uras (1953), Tahrihte Ermeniler ve Ermeni. Ankara. The book was re-published in an extended<br />

version in 1976 and – extended further – in English: Esad Uras (1988), The Armenians<br />

in History and the Armenian Question. Istanbul. Concerning the Turkish versions see Foss<br />

(1922), p. 14 and note 22.<br />

31 Uras (1988), p. 884.<br />

32 These historians lived from the 5th through to the 11th centuries, e.g. Moses of Koren. Uras<br />

(1988), p. 225-44.<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!