23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Martin Mennecke and Eric Markusen<br />

is its narrow defi nition of what constitutes a victim group...” 24 Leo Kuper<br />

added that this could be understood to mean that “many nations were<br />

unwilling to renounce the right to commit political genocide against their<br />

own nationals.” 25<br />

The initial two drafts of the Convention did include political groups, but<br />

efforts by a number of UN member states, including the Soviet Union,<br />

within whose borders, many such groups had previously been attacked,<br />

succeeded in having this category of protected group deleted in the fi nal<br />

version. In one of the earliest detailed critical analyses of the Convention,<br />

Drost argued in regard to the exclusion of political groups that “the defi nition<br />

of genocide in Article II defeats the purpose of the Convention.” 26 His<br />

criticism was echoed in a 1985 study of the Convention that was commissioned<br />

by the United Nations. Therein, Benjamin Whitaker warned that<br />

“...leaving political and other groups beyond the purported protection of<br />

the Convention offers a wide and dangerous loophole which permits any<br />

designated group to be exterminated, ostensibly under the excuse that this<br />

is for political reasons.” 27<br />

Attack against the protected group “in whole or in part”<br />

Another important element of the Convention’s defi nition is the phrase<br />

“in whole or in part”, indicating that the crime of genocide does not require<br />

the destruction of the entire protected group. Instead, the targeting<br />

of a part of such a group suffi ces to fulfi ll the legal defi nition. 28<br />

One question, however, remains: what “part” of a group must be targeted<br />

for destruction in order to meet the conditions of the <strong>Genocide</strong> Conven-<br />

24 Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn (1990), The History and Sociology of <strong>Genocide</strong>: Analyses and<br />

Case Studies. New Haven, p. 11.<br />

25 Leo Kuper (1981), <strong>Genocide</strong>: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century. New Haven, p. 29.<br />

26 Drost (1959), p. 124.<br />

27 Ben Whitaker (1985), Revised and Updated Report on the Question of the Prevention and Punishment<br />

of the Crime of <strong>Genocide</strong>, New York, United Nations (Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1985/6), p.<br />

19, para. 36.<br />

28 Commission of Experts, Final Report of the Commission of Experts Established Pursuant<br />

to Security Council Resolution 780, New York, United Nations, 27 May 1994 (Doc. S/1994/<br />

674), p. 25, para. 93. Also see Webb (1993), p. 392.<br />

300

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!