23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mehmet Necef<br />

This fear of contributing to Western orientalism is so strong that while<br />

he uses the term deportation (tehcir) in the Turkish text, he uses the term<br />

“exodus” in the English text. The difference between the two concepts is<br />

apparent: While deportation is something enforced on a group, exodus is<br />

something the group decides to do, for example, the exodus of the Jews<br />

from Egypt.<br />

As long as the Turks had to debate amongst themselves without the interference<br />

of foreign scholars, they, with a few exceptions, seemed to be<br />

content with a state-controlled and fi nanced, and thus very low level of<br />

scholarship on the subject. 8 However, the globalisation of the Armenian<br />

question forced Turkish intellectuals to rethink the issue and present more<br />

reasoned views which can be taken seriously by foreign scholars or politicians.<br />

Especially the works of historian Taner Akcam on the question and<br />

his interventions in the media heightened the level of debate.<br />

In the Turkish political debate there seem to be three taboos: the role of<br />

the military in Turkish politics, the Kurdish issue and the Armenian question.<br />

In recent years there has been more openness concerning the fi rst<br />

two issues. One can with impunity publish more or less critical books<br />

and articles and make television programmes on these issues. The Armenian<br />

question has also been affected by this general democratisation and<br />

weakening of “offi cially sanctioned truths” about the history and political<br />

life of the country. The Armenian taboo is being eroded and as Akcam<br />

has observed several scholarly conferences and symposiums on the issue<br />

have been arranged and a number of books, trying to present the question<br />

more objectively and less informed by the offi cially sanctioned line, have<br />

been published. 9 If this positive tone continues Turks could fi nally come to<br />

terms with their past.<br />

8 For some of the exceptions see Taner Timur (1996), Osmanli Calismalari. Ankara; Taner Timur<br />

(2000), Türkler ve Ermeniler. 1915 ve Sonrasi. Ankara; Mete Tuncay (1991), Cihat ve Tehcir.<br />

Istanbul.<br />

9 Taner Akcam (2000a), Ermeni tabusu aralanirken: Diayalogdan baska bir cözüm var mi? Istanbul,<br />

p. 3.<br />

228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!