Project Deliverable D50 Report on Best Practices ... - ESONET NoE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Firstname Lastname Institution Country Email Cécile Lietard ALTRAN France cecile.lietard@altran.com Jean Marvaldi IFREMER France Jean.Marvaldi@ifremer.fr Aurelien Maurin CPPM-CNRS France maurin.aurelien@gmail.com Nicolas Nowald UniHB Germany nnowald@marum.de Seda Okay DEU-IMST Turkey seda.okay@deu.edu.tr Tom O'Reilly MBARI USA oreilly@mbari.org Paris Pagonis HCMR Greece ppagonis@ath.hcmr.gr Albert Palanques CSIC Spain albertp@icm.csic.es Lionel Paofai ILLIPACK France noemie.Claval@illipack.com Olivier Peden IFREMER France olivier.peden@ifremer.fr Jaume Piera CSIC Spain jpiera@cmima.csic.es Olivier Pot IPGP France pot@ipgp.fr Ingrid Puillat IFREMER France ingrid.puillat@ifremer.fr Volker Ratmeyer UniHB Germany ratmeyer@marum.de Jean-François Rolin IFREMER France jrolin@ifremer.fr Jean-Yves Royer IUEM-CNRS France jyroyer@univ-brest.fr Henry Ruhl NOCS United Kingdom h.ruhl@noc.soton.ac.uk Florence Salvetat IFREMER France florence.salvetat@ifremer.fr Pierre Marie Sarradin IFREMER France Pierre.Marie.Sarradin@ifremer.fr Carla Scalabrin IFREMER France carla.scalabrin Klaus Schleisiek SEND Germany kschleisiek@send.de Shahram Shariat-Panahi UPC Spain Marck Smit NIOZ Netherlands msmit@nioz.nl Feng Tao NOCS United Kingdom bt2000@gmail.com Anders Tengberg Aanderaa Data Instruments Norway anders.tengberg@aadi.no Séverine Thomas Europôle Mer France Severine.Thomas@univ-brest.fr Stefano Vinci INGV Italy stefano.vinci@ingv.it Christoph Waldmann UniHB Germany waldmann@marum.de Frank Wenzhoefer MPIMM Germany fwenzhoe@mpi-bremen.de Jesper Zedlitz Christian-Albrechts- University Kiel Germany jze@informatik.uni-kiel.de <strong>Deliverable</strong> #50 - update October 2010 56
Annex C Slides from Anders Tendberg <strong>Deliverable</strong> #50 - update October 2010 57
Page 1 and 2:
Project contract n
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENT 1 Executive summary .......
Page 5 and 6: 1 Executive summary The main goal o
Page 7 and 8: 4 Sessions 4.1 General indications
Page 9 and 10: 4.2.2 Acoustic sensors 4.2.2.1 Intr
Page 11 and 12: In the marine environment a diversi
Page 13 and 14: 4.3.1.3 Debriefing - A document was
Page 15 and 16: defined by ESONET deliverables D11
Page 17 and 18: The generic sensor should be availa
Page 19 and 20: The oxygen sensor in the generic sp
Page 21 and 22: Common topics on time series analys
Page 23 and 24: Ecological communities Author: H. R
Page 25 and 26: Pan & tilt system, to find the righ
Page 27 and 28: References : http://www.listentothe
Page 29 and 30: Zaugg, S., van der Schaar, M., Hou
Page 31 and 32: e: connection e represents the conn
Page 33 and 34: Case Study In order to test the Ref
Page 35 and 36: operate it in a safe and productive
Page 37 and 38: White Paper for the Panel 3-3 - 20
Page 39 and 40: springs for release has shown its p
Page 41 and 42: Cathodic protection, including the
Page 43 and 44: Thursday 8 October Time Topic 09:00
Page 45 and 46: Friday 9 October Time Topic 08:15 S
Page 47 and 48: Generic session scheme Presentation
Page 49 and 50: o Existing or newly developed quali
Page 51 and 52: Working group G3 - Standardisation
Page 53 and 54: Objectives: The first meeting of th
Page 55: Firstname Lastname Institution Coun
Page 59 and 60: Criteria for Observatory Sensors Fi
Page 61 and 62: Possible sensor technology for obse
Page 63 and 64: http://www.act-us.info/ EURO ACT, l
Page 65 and 66: Calibration methods Temp Pr Current
Page 67 and 68: Which problems remain to be solved
Page 69 and 70: Tests : • Fluorescence sensors :
Page 71 and 72: Local Protection by electrochlorina
Page 73 and 74: WG 1 GENERIC INSTRUMENTATION PANEL
Page 75 and 76: Physical and Technological constrai
Page 77 and 78: Annex D EARTH SEA SCIENCE IN KM3Net
Page 79 and 80: I - Manage data from the above. (Sp
Page 81 and 82: Figure 2: Secondary junction box of
Page 83 and 84: Docking unit is also the structural
Page 85 and 86: Infrastructure / Standalone observa
Page 87 and 88: Infrastructure / Standalone observa
Page 89 and 90: Annex F1: processing of ELISA data
Page 91 and 92: Figure 2: currents measured around
Page 93 and 94: depth (m) Due to inertial currents
Page 95 and 96: Figure 6: Rebuilt Time series of sa
Page 97 and 98: ANNEXE F2 - M. FAUZI's presentation
Page 99 and 100: 40 km submarine cable -2475m depth
Page 101 and 102: CTD ADCP Interdisciplinary Instrume
Page 103 and 104: Deliverable #50 -
Page 105 and 106: Shore Station : M. Pacha 40km Elect
Page 107 and 108:
Antares Database and Web site proje
Page 109 and 110:
Deliverables / Pla
Page 111 and 112:
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e V
Page 113 and 114:
Just in time data conversion Web GU
Page 115 and 116:
Deliverable #50 -
Page 117 and 118:
Let’s see it live SeaFloor test s
Page 119 and 120:
Ecological Communities •Species c
Page 121 and 122:
Spatio-Temporal Correlations • Ti
Page 123 and 124:
Deliverable #50 -
Page 125 and 126:
E. minutissima Ec. rostrata Density
Page 127 and 128:
10-12 months for the RAD (r = 0.38;
Page 129 and 130:
Total density (TAD) (ind. grab -1 )
Page 131 and 132:
Total density (TA D)(ind. grab -1 )
Page 133 and 134:
El Niño Southern Oscillation, Nort
Page 135 and 136:
Fishery Sciences and Technology Dep
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
ANNEX F6 - DEBRIEFING : Del
Page 145 and 146:
Introduction • From the first Bes
Page 147 and 148:
Time-Series Analysis Considerations
Page 149 and 150:
• CTD F, Bio, etc…. Time series
Page 151 and 152:
Deliverable #50 -
Page 153 and 154:
CTD Some examples of time series
Page 155 and 156:
Development of an Automated Protoco
Page 157 and 158:
Data management collaboration with
show all

Project Deliverable D50 Report on Best Practices ... - ESONET NoE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?