The Future of Animal Agriculture in North America - Farm Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Economics of Production, Processing and Marketing 37 Bradford, E., R.L. Baldwin, H. Blackburn, K.G. Cassman, and P.R. Crosson. (1999). “Animal Agriculture and Global Food Supply.” Task Force Rep. 135 Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Coffey, B., J. Mintert, S. Fox, T. Schroeder, and L. Valentin. (2005, April). “The Economic Impact of BSE on the U.S. Beef Industry: Product Value Losses, Regulatory Costs, and Consumer Reactions.” Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, MF-2678. Dickinson, D.L. and D. Bailey. (2002). “Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for it?” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27, 348-364. Drabenstott, M., M. Henry, and K. Mitchell. Where have all the Packing Plants Gone? The New Meat Geography in Rural America. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Feenstra, G.W. (2005). “What Is Sustainable Agriculture?” University of California–Davis. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/ktca/ farmhouses/sustainable_agriculture.html. Golan, E., B. Krissoff, F. Kuchler, L. Calvin, K. Nelson, and G. Price. (2004). “Traceability in the U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economic Report Number 830. Goldsmith, P. and H. Idris. (2001, November). The Economic Impact of Illinois’s Livestock Industry. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Goldsmith, P. and J. Kim. (2002, August). The Economic Impact of Illinois’s Livestock Industry: Supply-Chain Linkages. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Grier, K. (2003, November). Commentary on Exchange Rate Impacts on Hog/Pork Competitiveness. Available at http://www.georgemorris.org/GMC/Publications/Competitiveness.aspx. Grimes, G. and R. Plain. (2005, January). “U.S. Hog Marketing Contract Study.” Department of Agricultural Economics Working Paper No. AEWP 2005-01, University of Missouri. Available at: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/vertstud05.htm. Groen, AB F., and K. Greef. (2003). “Societal Concerns About Pork and Pork Production and Their Relationship to the Production System.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 137-162. Hayenga, M., T. Schroeder, J. Lawrence, D. Hayes, T. Vukina, C. Ward, and W. Purcell. (2000, May). Meat Packer Vertical Integration and Contract Linkages in the Beef and Pork Industries: An Economic Perspective. Report for the American Meat Institute. Available at http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/bulletins_2/industry/packer/AMIReport.pdf. Herath, D.P., A.J. Weersink, and C.L. Carpentier. “Spatial and Temporal Changes in the U.S. Hog, Dairy, and Fed- Cattle Sectors, 1975-2000.” Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(1), 49-69. Johnson, A.S. (2003, February). “Export Opportunities.” Agricultural Marketing Resource Center, Iowa State University. Available at http://www.agmrc.org/agmrc/commodity/livestock/beef/beef+natural.htm. Liddell, S. and D. Bailey. (2001). “Market Opportunities and Threats to the U.S. Pork Industry Posed by Traceability Systems.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4, 287-302. Market Integration of the North American Animal Products Complex: (2005, May). LDP-M-131-01. Molnar, J., T. Hoban, and G. Brant. (2002). “Passing the Cluck, Dodging Pullets: Corporate Power, Environmental Responsibility, and the Contract Poultry Grower.” Southern Rural Sociology, 18(2), 23-32. Muth, M.K., G. Brester, J. Del Roccili, S. Koontz, B. Martin, N. Piggott, J. Taylor, T. Vukina, and M. Wohlgenant. (2005, July). “Spot and Alternative Marketing Arrangements in the Livestock and Meat Industries.” Interim Report Prepared for The Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Available at http://151.121.3.117/psp/issues/livemarketstudy/LMMS_Interim_Report.pdf. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). (2005). “2002 Census of Agriculture Summary.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, NASS. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/wv/.
38 Economics of Production, Processing and Marketing Ochoa, V. and S. Zahniser. (2003). “The Mexican Hog Industry: Moving Beyond 2003.” Paper prepared for the Policy Disputes Information Consortium’s Ninth Agricultural and Food Policy Workshop Farm Policy Developments and Tensions with NAFTA, Montreal, Quebec. Oenema, O. (2004). “Governmental Policies and Measures Regulating Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Animal Manure in European Agriculture.” Journal of Animal Science, 182, E196-E206. Purdue University Cooperative Extension. (1997). “FoodSystem 21.” Purdue University Cooperative Extension. Available at http://www.agecon.purdue.edu/cab/research/articles/FS%2021%20 Hog_Pork%20Sector.pdf. Ribaudo, M., N. Gollehon, M. Aillery, J. Kaplan, R. Johansson, H. Agapoff, L. Christensen, V. Breneman, and M. Peters. “Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land.” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Agriculture Economic Report 824. Schroeder, T.C., C.E. Ward, J. Lawrence, and D.M. Feuz. (2002, June). “Fed Cattle Marketing Trends and Concerns: Cattle Feeder Survey Results.” Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, MF-2561. Schroeder, T.C. and J. Kovanda. (2003). “Beef Alliances: Motivations, Extent, and Future Prospects.” The Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice, 19, 397-417. Shapouri, H. and A. McAloon. (2005, July). “The 2001 Net Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol.” USDA, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review. Souza-Monteiro, D.M. and J.A. Caswell. (2004, June). “The Economics of Implementing Traceability in Beef Supply Chains: Trends in Major Producing and Trading Countries.” University of Massachusetts Amherst Working Paper No. 2004-6. Sutton, A.L., J.F. Power, D.L. Day, J.P. Fontenot, D.L. Forster, D.M. Huber, K.A. Kelling, T.A. McCaskey, J.A. Moore, and L.M. Safley, Jr. (1996). “Integrated Animal Waste Management.” CAST Rpt. 128. Sutton, A.L., K.B. Kephart, M.W.A. Verstegen, T.T. Canh, and P.J. Hobbs. (1999). “Potential for reduction of odorous compounds in swine manure through diet modification.” Journal of Animal Science, 77, 430-439. Tegtmeir, E. and P. Duffy. (2004). “External costs of animal production in the U.S.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2(1), 1-20. Thaler, R. (2002, August). “Use of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) in Swine Diets.” South Dakota Extension, ExEx 2035. Available at http://www.distillersgrains.org. Tonsor, G.T. and T.C. Schroeder. (2005). “Livestock Identification: Lessons for the U.S. Beef Industry from the Australian System.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service. (2005, September). Mandatory Price Reporting Report. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/LDP/Sep05/ldpm13501/. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service. (2005, March). “Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade.” Available at http://www.fas.usda.gov/dlp/circular/2005/05-04LP/toc.htm. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service. (2005, September). “GAIN Report; 9/1/2005.” GAIN Report Number MX5077. Weida, W.J. (2001). A Review of the Proposal and Draft DEQ Permit for a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Operation by Big Sky Farms, LLC in Cassia County, ID. Weida. W.J. (2004). “Industrial Animal Production in the United States.” Department of Economics. Colorado Springs: Colorado College, and the Global Resource Action Center for the Environment. Available at http://www.factoryfarm.org/docs/Economic_Implications_of_CAFOs_1500.doc. Williamson, O.E. (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1979), 233-261.
Page 2 and 3: The Future of Animal Agriculture in
Page 4 and 5: Consumer Demand Working Group Helen
Page 6 and 7: Foreword Farm Foundation is a catal
Page 8 and 9: Executive Summary The Future of Ani
Page 20: The Future of Animal Agriculture in
Page 23 and 24: 16 growth in the number of Canadian
Page 25 and 26: 18 Consumer Demand The demand for m
Page 27 and 28: 20 Nutrient loading on farmland fro
Page 30 and 31: Chapter 2 Economics of Production,
Page 32 and 33: Economics of Production, Processing
Page 38 and 39: The Future Economics of Production,
Page 46 and 47: Chapter 3 Consumer Demand Issues Co
Page 48 and 49: The consumer food demand pyramid, i
Page 50 and 51: devote less time and effort to food
Page 52 and 53: dollar. Many of the retail environm
Page 54 and 55: economies will increase demand for
Page 56 and 57: Information Needs Long term, how wi
Page 58 and 59: Table 1. 2005 Population and Recent
Page 60 and 61: Figure 3. U.S. Meat Consumption Pou
Page 62 and 63: Consumer Demand Issues 55 Figure 7.
Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4 Global Competitiveness an
Page 66 and 67: tariff-rate quota (TRQ) in place on
Page 68 and 69: 2004 EU enlargement is expected to
Page 70 and 71: provide guidelines for animal healt
Page 72 and 73: affordable foods to many developing
Page 74 and 75: With NAFTA, and indeed before, seve
Page 76 and 77: competitors. Economic logic, howeve
Page 78 and 79: Global Competitiveness and Trade 71
Page 80 and 81: Figure 4. World Beef Consumption So
Page 82 and 83: Figure 8. World Poultry Meat Produc
Page 84 and 85: Figure 12. Major Dairy Exporters So
Page 86: Global Competitiveness and Trade 79
Page 89 and 90: 82 and medical professions. This in
Page 91 and 92: 84 produced under specific contract
Page 93 and 94: 86 establishing food safety system
Page 95 and 96:
88 In the United States, FDA, under
Page 97 and 98:
90 Policy Options and Implications
Page 99 and 100:
92 A national structure coordinated
Page 101 and 102:
94 Food Safety and Animal Health Pr
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 6 Environmental Issues The
Page 106 and 107:
positive and negative externalities
Page 108 and 109:
environmental damage. Climate, soil
Page 110 and 111:
Managing or changing the components
Page 112 and 113:
transportation access and costs; in
Page 114 and 115:
could also be integrated air and wa
Page 116 and 117:
and services. The success of the lo
Page 118 and 119:
Environmental Issues 111 Metcalfe,
Page 120 and 121:
Figure 2. Environmental Issues 113
Page 122 and 123:
Chapter 7 Community and Labor Anima
Page 124 and 125:
Slow economic growth in recent year
Page 126 and 127:
informational hearing, at which com
Page 128 and 129:
An aspect that should not be overlo
Page 130 and 131:
States, FSIR would consider the no-
Page 132 and 133:
• compensate parties harmed by an
Page 134 and 135:
Community and Labor 127 Flora, C.B.
Page 136 and 137:
Community and Labor 129 Senthilselv
Page 138 and 139:
Community and Labor 131 Table 3. Un
Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 8 Animal Welfare Animal agr
Page 142 and 143:
In 2005, the Canadian Pork Council
Page 144 and 145:
voluntary codes of practice are bei
Page 146 and 147:
eak the rules; discipline is far mo
Page 148 and 149:
In the final analysis, economic for
Page 150 and 151:
References Animal Welfare 143 Agra
Page 152 and 153:
Box 1. Animal Welfare Legislation i
Page 154 and 155:
Animal Welfare 147 Box 3. Animal We
Page 156 and 157:
Source: Agra CEAS Consulting Ltd. (
Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 9 A Look to the Future Ther
Page 160 and 161:
safety, animal welfare, process ass
show all

The Future of Animal Agriculture in North America - Farm Foundation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?