23.10.2013 Views

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thirty percent <strong>of</strong> the papers reported no <strong>in</strong>teraction (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g additive effects),<br />

35% reported antagonistic effects, <strong>and</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the papers reported synergistic or<br />

rarely potentiative effects. Additivity was def<strong>in</strong>ed as 100 ± 20 % <strong>of</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gle-agent effects.<br />

The percent response to comb<strong>in</strong>ed chemicals show<strong>in</strong>g synergism, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the author, was <strong>in</strong> the range 120-5300 % with a mean ± SD <strong>of</strong> 360 ±<br />

589 (n=215 comb<strong>in</strong>ations). All dose comb<strong>in</strong>ations from the table by Nelson was<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the calculation. Only 11 comb<strong>in</strong>ations gave rise to effects exceed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1000 %. Almost all <strong>of</strong> these (n=10) were studies on ret<strong>in</strong>oic acid <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

with either TCDD or z<strong>in</strong>c or prote<strong>in</strong> deficiency i.e. studies highly related to<br />

nutrition.<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> the papers was highly variable (<strong>in</strong> general: few animals, few dose<br />

levels, maternal toxicity not considered, time-effect relationships not <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong>consistent use <strong>of</strong> terms). ‘Potentiation’ was the term misused most<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten; frequently the more appropriate term would have been synergism.<br />

7.4.5 Conclusions<br />

<strong>Comb<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> two or more chemical compounds has shown that<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction may or may not occur, <strong>and</strong> that it is impossible predict<strong>in</strong>g the outcome<br />

based on experimental conditions alone. However, the published data suggest that<br />

the prevail<strong>in</strong>g outcome <strong>of</strong> exposure to mixtures deduced from <strong>in</strong> vivo experiments<br />

is either an antagonistic effect or no <strong>in</strong>teractive effect, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an additive effect.<br />

Frequently, one type <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction was noted at some doses, while another type <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction was noted at other doses. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the results suggests that low<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong>ten produced either no effect or additive effects, whereas<br />

higher doses produced antagonistic or synergistic effects.<br />

In addition, comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> chemicals with common features such as similar<br />

structure or similar type <strong>of</strong> effect on a common target organ probably are more<br />

likely to result <strong>in</strong> an - at least additive - effect. In such cases, additivity should be<br />

considered <strong>in</strong> the assessment <strong>of</strong> the exposure to mixtures. However, when<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g simultaneous exposure to two or more chemicals <strong>in</strong> general, the<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> a possible <strong>in</strong>teraction or an additive effect should<br />

be considered on a case-by-case basis.<br />

7.5 Endocr<strong>in</strong>e disrupt<strong>in</strong>g chemicals<br />

Prepared by Anne Marie V<strong>in</strong>ggaard<br />

7.5.1 Introduction<br />

Abnormal sexual development <strong>in</strong> wildlife, the worldwide rise <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong><br />

testicular cancer, developmental disorders <strong>of</strong> the male reproductive tract <strong>and</strong> the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g rise <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> female breast cancer are caus<strong>in</strong>g widespread<br />

concern. It has been suggested that these effects might be related to environmental<br />

chemicals, which are able to mimic endogenous estrogens. The list <strong>of</strong> chemicals<br />

reported to show estrogenic activity has grown considerably dur<strong>in</strong>g the last years<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!