Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures
Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures
Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>of</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty i.e. differences <strong>in</strong> toxicok<strong>in</strong>etics (aspects such as absorption,<br />
distribution, biotransformation, <strong>and</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ation which determ<strong>in</strong>e delivery <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chemical to its site <strong>of</strong> action/toxicity) <strong>and</strong> toxicodynamics (aspects such as target<br />
organ sensitivity, cytoprotective mechanisms <strong>and</strong> homeostatic control which<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>es the extent <strong>of</strong> any effect or response due to the presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chemical). The default values <strong>of</strong> the four <strong>in</strong>dividual factors were modified by the<br />
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) <strong>in</strong> 1994 (IPCS 1994) (Table<br />
3.1.1). These default values may be further modified when appropriate data exist<br />
on the toxicok<strong>in</strong>etic <strong>and</strong>/or toxicodynamic properties <strong>of</strong> the compound <strong>in</strong><br />
experimental animals <strong>and</strong> humans. Although there are still only few examples<br />
where the data on a compound are <strong>of</strong> such quality as to allow for replacement <strong>of</strong><br />
the default values it is anticipated that this approach will ga<strong>in</strong> widespread use <strong>in</strong> the<br />
future.<br />
In connection with the elaboration <strong>of</strong> health based quality criteria for chemical<br />
pollutants <strong>in</strong> air, soil <strong>and</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water the Danish EPA establish TDI –values<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g three safety factors. The safety factors account for:<br />
SF1: Interspecies extrapolation (from animal to human). This factor is<br />
historically set at 10 as a default value.<br />
SF2: Variation <strong>in</strong> susceptibility among humans, i.e. to account for possible<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased susceptibility <strong>in</strong> the pregnant, children, elderly or sick people.<br />
This factor is <strong>of</strong>ten set at 10.<br />
SF3: The adequacy, quality <strong>and</strong> relevance <strong>of</strong> the data set. To account for lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> a NOAEL value, lack <strong>of</strong> long-term test<strong>in</strong>g, lack <strong>of</strong> data on specific end<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t, etc. This factor is set at a value from 1 to 100 depend<strong>in</strong>g on a<br />
concrete evaluation.<br />
When us<strong>in</strong>g this approach <strong>in</strong> connection with chemical pollutants the overall safety<br />
factor (SF1 x SF2 x SF x SF3) most <strong>of</strong>ten has been set <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 100-1000.<br />
Table 3.1.1. Subdivision <strong>of</strong> the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty factor. Default values (IPCS 1994).<br />
Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />
Default UF Default UF<br />
Interspecies variation 10<br />
Toxicok<strong>in</strong>etics 4.0<br />
Toxicodynamics 2.5<br />
Inter<strong>in</strong>dividual (human) variation 10<br />
Toxicok<strong>in</strong>etic 3.2<br />
Toxicodynamic 3.2<br />
Total 100 100<br />
37