23.10.2013 Views

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

Combined Actions and Interactions of Chemicals in Mixtures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nickel compounds are carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic to humans <strong>and</strong> animals. However, the<br />

mechanism lead<strong>in</strong>g to tumour formation is still not fully understood s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

mutagenic potential is rather weak. Nickel(II) is mostly non-mutagenic <strong>in</strong> bacterial<br />

test systems <strong>and</strong> only weakly mutagenic <strong>in</strong> mammalian cell l<strong>in</strong>es. In contrast to the<br />

weak mutagenic activity Ni(II) enhance cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> mutagenicity <strong>of</strong> several<br />

other DNA damag<strong>in</strong>g agents. In mammalian cells <strong>in</strong> culture Ni(II) enhanced the<br />

UV-<strong>in</strong>duced cytoxicity, mutagenicity <strong>and</strong> SCE <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster V79 cells<br />

(Christie 1989). In comb<strong>in</strong>ation with benzo(a)pyrene, nickel(II) enhances the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> mutations <strong>and</strong> cell transformation <strong>in</strong> Syrian hamster embryo cells<br />

(Rivedal & Sanner 1980). A possible mechanism for the synergistic effect <strong>of</strong> Ni(II)<br />

could be <strong>in</strong>terference with excision repair processes. Hartwig et al. (1994) used<br />

UVC light to study the <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>of</strong> Ni(II) with DNA repair. By different<br />

techniques they were able to show that non-cytotoxic doses <strong>of</strong> Ni(II) delayed the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cision step <strong>in</strong> nucleotide excision repair <strong>in</strong> mammalian cells after low, biological<br />

relevant UV doses. The <strong>in</strong>terference with DNA repair is partly reversible by the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> magnesium(II), provid<strong>in</strong>g further evidence that the competition with<br />

essential metal ion may be an important mechanism for the toxic action <strong>of</strong> Ni(II).<br />

Similar <strong>in</strong>teractions with DNA repair <strong>of</strong> UV-<strong>in</strong>duced DNA damage have been<br />

observed with other carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic <strong>and</strong>/or mutagenic metal ions.<br />

Co(II) is weakly mutagenic at the HPRT locus <strong>and</strong> enhances the frequency <strong>of</strong> SCE<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster V79 cells. Additionally, at both endpo<strong>in</strong>ts the metal ion<br />

enhanced the genotoxicity <strong>of</strong> UV light. Analyses <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> str<strong>and</strong>-break<br />

<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>and</strong> closure after UV irradiation by nucleotide sedimentation reveals an<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> str<strong>and</strong> breaks <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> Co(II). This <strong>in</strong>dicates that either<br />

the polymerisation or ligation step <strong>in</strong> excision is affected (Hartwig 1991). It has<br />

also been shown that Co(II), at non-cytotoxic doses, <strong>in</strong>hibits both the <strong>in</strong>cision <strong>and</strong><br />

polymerisation step <strong>of</strong> the repair <strong>of</strong> UV <strong>in</strong>duced DNA lesions, as measured by the<br />

alkal<strong>in</strong>e unw<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g technique <strong>in</strong> human fibroblasts (Kasten et al. 1997). It was<br />

demonstrated by competition experiments that one possible mechanism is the<br />

exchange <strong>of</strong> essential magnesium (II) ions by cobalt (II), s<strong>in</strong>ce the cobalt(II)<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> the polymerisation step was completely reversed by the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> magnesium(II).<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g the COMET assay on isolated human lymphocytes De Boeck et al (1998)<br />

could demonstrate that cobalt metal was able to <strong>in</strong>hibit the repair <strong>of</strong><br />

methylmethansulfonate (MMS) <strong>in</strong>duced DNA damage. The majority <strong>of</strong> the MMS<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced lesions are processed via the base excision-repair pathway. After<br />

recognition <strong>and</strong> excision <strong>of</strong> the MMS-alkylated bases, an apur<strong>in</strong>ic site (AP) occurs<br />

as <strong>in</strong>termediate. When cobalt <strong>in</strong>hibits the action <strong>of</strong> the polymerase, the persist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

alkali labile AP sites will give rise to s<strong>in</strong>gle str<strong>and</strong> breaks, which will result <strong>in</strong><br />

DNA fragmentation /migration <strong>in</strong> the COMET assay.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> DNA str<strong>and</strong> breaks by alkal<strong>in</strong>e elution <strong>in</strong>dicates that DNA repair <strong>of</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster ovary cells treated with MMS was <strong>in</strong>hibited by sodium arsenite<br />

(Lee-Chen 1993). The enhanc<strong>in</strong>g effect was ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

excision <strong>of</strong> alkali-labile sites.<br />

The above-mentioned <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong>teraction with DNA repair<br />

might be a common mechanism <strong>of</strong> metal genotoxicity.<br />

It is important to note that large differences exist <strong>in</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> various DNA<br />

repair systems between different types <strong>of</strong> mammalian cells, e.g. between rodent<br />

cells <strong>and</strong> human cells. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster ovary (CHO) cells clearly differ from<br />

human cells concern<strong>in</strong>g the relative resistance to methylat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> ethylat<strong>in</strong>g agents,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the persistence <strong>of</strong> the chromosomal aberrations <strong>in</strong>duced by such agents. CHO<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!