fraction (A1a) also overlaps concordia, but has a distinctly higher 207 Pb/ 206 Pb age at 2695.1±3.3 Ma, and is interpreted as reflecting a mixture <strong>of</strong> an inherited component (e.g., 2703 Ma or older Tisdale assemblage) and magmatic growth within <strong>the</strong> porphyry at 2684 Ma. A 2684 Ma age for D2 deformation is consistent with <strong>the</strong> general observation by Bateman et al. (2004) that folds <strong>of</strong> this generation occurred after deposition <strong>of</strong> Porcupine assemblage (
03PJM-131 Quartz-feldspar porphyry, Pamour Mine area, Whitney Township (NAD83, Zone 17 UTM 489978E, 5373473N; #19 on Figure 2 and Table 1) As described by MacDonald and Piercey (2003) and MacDonald, Piercey and Hamilton (2005), <strong>the</strong> recently identified Pamour body southwest <strong>of</strong> Pamour Mine is a weakly foliated, moderately fresh, quartz- and feldspar-bearing porphyry carrying minor biotite alteration (disseminated fine flakes or 5– 20 mm clusters), and little pyrite. Phenocrysts within <strong>the</strong> porphyry average 1 to 2 mm, but reach up to 5 mm in maximum dimension. This unit sharply intrudes strongly altered (talc-carbonate) ultramafic volcanic rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hersey Lake formation in <strong>the</strong> lower Tisdale assemblage. The Pamour porphyry appears to truncate an earlier structural foliation developed in <strong>the</strong> host rocks, and is itself characterized internally by only a weak fabric, which may have originated by magmatic flow (MacDonald and Piercey 2003; MacDonald, Piercey and Hamilton 2004; 2005; Bateman et al. 2004, 2005, this study). The significance <strong>of</strong> this is discussed below. A representative sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> porphyry was collected for dating <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> 340.8 to 392 m interval <strong>of</strong> Porcupine Joint Venture drill hole 18986. Quartz-feldspar porphyry sample 03PJM-131 yielded a relatively diverse population <strong>of</strong> poor-quality zircons, comprising small, generally square bipyramids, pale to medium brown in colour, and <strong>of</strong>ten cracked, frosted or turbid, with some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger grains being slightly rounded (resorbed xenocrysts?). The best-quality (clearest, inclusion- and crack-free) grains were given strong air-abrasion before final selection and analysis, but <strong>the</strong> results are scattered: three fractions lie on or near concordia between 2680 and 2703 Ma (2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fractions have large errors, due in part to elevated common Pb; Table A1; Figure 5E). These data likely reflect varying degrees <strong>of</strong> zircon inheritance <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tisdale assemblage or underlying units within porphyry magmatic grains. Two darker brown single grains are both highly discordant (A1b, A1c: Figure 5E). However, <strong>the</strong> datum for a single brown square bipyramid (fraction A1f) is only slightly discordant (0.5%) and at present provides <strong>the</strong> best estimate for <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, at 2677.5±2.0 Ma ( 207 Pb/ 206 Pb age). This interpretation is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that analysis A1f itself does not contain inheritance; fur<strong>the</strong>r, because <strong>of</strong> its minor discordance, <strong>the</strong> 2677.5 Ma age could be regarded as a minimum time <strong>of</strong> emplacement. Preliminary U/Pb results have been obtained for minor, euhedral pale yellow titanite <strong>from</strong> this sample. Two initial single-grain fractions are variably discordant, but suggest an upper intercept age <strong>of</strong> ~2673±11 Ma. Although imprecise, <strong>the</strong> titanite age is consistent with simple cooling through ca. 600°C following igneous crystallization, as defined by <strong>the</strong> best zircon age estimate near 2677.5 Ma. In summary, <strong>the</strong> best approximation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> emplacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pamour porphyry is provisionally estimated at 2677.5±2.0 Ma, though this conclusion is based upon a slightly discordant single analysis. A more robust assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> true age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body is hampered by inheritance and Pbloss effects. Although younger than most o<strong>the</strong>r porphyry intrusions in <strong>the</strong> Timmins area (ca. 2687– 2692 Ma), <strong>the</strong> ca. 2678 Ma age is entirely consistent with <strong>the</strong> observation that <strong>the</strong> Pamour intrusion carries less <strong>of</strong> a structural fabric than its counterparts and host rocks and may <strong>the</strong>refore independently provide a minimum age for D2 deformation. This interpretation is supported independently by <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hoyle Pond porphyry (2684.4±1.9 Ma: see 03ED-096A above), which may be synchronous with D2 structures. An interesting additional observation is that <strong>the</strong> ca. 2678 Ma Pamour porphyry age correlates with a distinct population <strong>of</strong> youngest detrital zircons found within Dome formation sediments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowermost Timiskaming Group (2679 Ma: Ayer et al. 2003; Corfu, Jackson and Sutcliffe 1991). 119
- Page 1:
ISBN 0-7794-8652-8 THESE TERMS GOVE
- Page 5:
ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File
- Page 9:
Contents Abstract .................
- Page 13:
Appendix 1. Thermal Ionization Mass
- Page 17:
Miscellaneous Release—Data 155 Di
- Page 21:
The Timmins area and Kirkland Lake-
- Page 25:
Overview of Results from the Greens
- Page 28 and 29:
3. The geophysical subproject funct
- Page 30 and 31:
The following Preliminary Maps have
- Page 32 and 33:
Samples with zircons analyzed by SH
- Page 34 and 35:
Figure 4. U/Pb concordia plots of T
- Page 36 and 37:
Figure 6. U/Pb concordia plot of TI
- Page 38 and 39:
Targeting of several of these overg
- Page 40 and 41:
Figure 10. U/Pb SHRIMP results from
- Page 42 and 43:
In northwest Cleaver Township, a fe
- Page 44 and 45:
SHRIMP U/Pb dating was carried out
- Page 46 and 47:
Stratigraphic Framework In this sec
- Page 48 and 49:
PACAUD ASSEMBLAGE The 2750 to 2735
- Page 50 and 51:
The iron formation and chert brecci
- Page 52 and 53:
(thickness) of banded iron-poor iro
- Page 54 and 55:
clast conglomerates at the top of t
- Page 56 and 57:
BLAKE RIVER ASSEMBLAGE Lower Part T
- Page 58 and 59:
The Krist formation consists of cal
- Page 60 and 61:
Timmins Area In the Timmins area, t
- Page 62 and 63:
Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Area Hyde
- Page 64 and 65:
Intrusion Framework The plutonic ro
- Page 66 and 67:
The youngest dated synvolcanic mafi
- Page 68 and 69:
Albitite dikes are crosscut by gold
- Page 70 and 71:
Worming Geophysical Data Treatment
- Page 72 and 73:
In Timmins, the first generation of
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 20. Geological sketch map of
- Page 76 and 77:
from Halfmoon Lake, only 2 km to th
- Page 78 and 79:
The Blake River Group is divided in
- Page 80 and 81:
Figure 22. Geological map of Munro
- Page 82 and 83:
Mine stratigraphic succession, have
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 24. Geological map of Currie
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 5. Simplified classification
- Page 88 and 89:
mesocumulate). The Stoughton-Roquem
- Page 90 and 91:
Shaw Dome Area GEOLOGICAL SETTING T
- Page 92 and 93:
66 Figure 26. A generalized map of
- Page 94 and 95: 1999) in their REE patterns and oth
- Page 96 and 97: plumbing system geometrically stabl
- Page 98 and 99: GOLD MINERALIZATION Production comm
- Page 100 and 101: The Narrows Break mineralized zone,
- Page 102 and 103: Table 7. Diagnostic mineral assembl
- Page 104 and 105: anomaly and the Dome Mine (Figures
- Page 106 and 107: Recommendations • Further testing
- Page 108 and 109: of the inversion product. (Recent a
- Page 110 and 111: the evidence for pre-Pacaud strata
- Page 112 and 113: plutonism suggests the onset of reg
- Page 114 and 115: Watkinson and Comba 1989; Gibson an
- Page 116 and 117: The Kirkland Lake giant gold deposi
- Page 118 and 119: The Timmins and Kirkland Lake-Larde
- Page 120 and 121: References Ames, D.E., Bleeker, W.,
- Page 122 and 123: Bleeker, W., Parrish, R.R. and Sage
- Page 124 and 125: Galley, A.G., Pilote, P. and Davis,
- Page 126 and 127: Heather, K.B., Percival, J.A., Mose
- Page 128 and 129: Lesher, C.M., 1989. Komatiite-assoc
- Page 130 and 131: Péloquin, A.S., Verpaelst, P., and
- Page 132 and 133: Stern, R.A. 1997. The GSC sensitive
- Page 134 and 135: 108 This page left blank intentiona
- Page 136 and 137: THERMAL IONIZATION MASS SPECTROMETR
- Page 138 and 139: 04BHA-0462 Granophyre, Kamiskotia G
- Page 140 and 141: contrastingly have been dated near
- Page 142 and 143: The revised age of 2672.8±1.1 Ma f
- Page 146 and 147: 04JAA-0010 Albitite dike cutting Ti
- Page 148 and 149: Therefore, on geochronological grou
- Page 150 and 151: Three individual grains were analyz
- Page 152 and 153: 03VOI-0422-1 Trachytic lava, Timisk
- Page 154 and 155: 03SJP-115-1 Monzonite, Clifford sto
- Page 156 and 157: the original Corfu (1993) age, only
- Page 158 and 159: Table A1. U/Pb isotopic data for zi
- Page 160 and 161: 206 Sample Analysis Description Wei
- Page 162 and 163: Appendix 2 Sensitive High-Resolutio
- Page 164 and 165: Table A2. Ion microprobe (SHRIMP II
- Page 166 and 167: Table A2. continued Struct. U Th Pb
- Page 168 and 169: Table A2. continued 204 U Th Pb* Pb
- Page 170 and 171: Table A2. continued 204 U Th Pb* Pb
- Page 172: Metric Conversion Table Conversion
- Page 175 and 176: Chart A. Magnetic and Gravity Three