Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. Source <strong>of</strong> Sulphur: The magma must have access to an external sulphur source to achieve early<br />
sulphide saturation and to segregate significant abundances <strong>of</strong> immiscible sulphides at a high<br />
(crustal) level;<br />
3. Dynamic System: The ores must form in a dynamic system where <strong>the</strong> magmas can interact with<br />
country rocks (to extract S) and where <strong>the</strong> sulphides can equilibrate with a sufficient amount <strong>of</strong><br />
magma to generate high chalcophile element contents in <strong>the</strong> sulphides (i.e., high R factor);<br />
4. Physical Trap: The sulphides must be concentrated in some type <strong>of</strong> physical trap (embayment,<br />
inflection).<br />
Abitibi <strong>Greenstone</strong> Belt<br />
NICKEL SULPHIDE DEPOSITS<br />
Nickel-copper-(platinum group element)(PGE) discoveries in <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt occurred<br />
sporadically, including several periods <strong>of</strong> intense exploration and discovery alternating with o<strong>the</strong>r periods<br />
with only minimal mineral exploration (Figure 25): Period I (1907–1915) included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Alexo Mine; Period II (1950–1951) included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Texmont Mine; Period III (1960–1977)<br />
included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> Langmuir Mine (#1 and #2); and Period IV (1989–1998) included <strong>the</strong> discovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dundeal Horizon, and Period V (2003 to current) includes <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> C-Zone in <strong>the</strong><br />
Bannockburn area. Thus, Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization continues to be discovered whenever <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
sufficient exploration activity.<br />
Komatiite-associated Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits, prospects and showings in <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt<br />
occur exclusively in <strong>the</strong> 2719 to 2710 Ma Kidd–Munro assemblage (e.g., Alexo, Dundonald South,<br />
Dumont, Marbridge) and <strong>the</strong> 2710 to 2703 Ma Tisdale assemblage (e.g., Langmuir, McWatters, Redstone,<br />
Texmont, Sothman, Bannockburn). No deposits have been discovered in <strong>the</strong> 2750 to 2735 Ma Pacaud<br />
assemblage and 2723 to 2720 Ma Stoughton–Roquemaure assemblage. The likely reasons for this are<br />
discussed below.<br />
The deposits almost always occur in clusters. For example, <strong>the</strong>re are 6 known deposits in <strong>the</strong> Shaw<br />
Dome, 4 in <strong>the</strong> Bannockburn area, 5 in <strong>the</strong> Dundonald area, and at least 4 in <strong>the</strong> Lamotte area. This is <strong>the</strong><br />
normal pattern for komatiite-associated Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits worldwide, exemplified by <strong>the</strong> deposits in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kambalda–St. Ives–Tramways–Widgiemooltha–Carnilya Hill district in Western Australia (Barnes<br />
2004). Clearly, areas where only one or two deposits have been discovered, such as <strong>the</strong> Bartlett and<br />
Halliday domes, have significant potential for discovery <strong>of</strong> additional deposits.<br />
KOMATIITE PHYSICAL VOLCANOLOGY<br />
Interpreting volcanic environments is difficult as it may be complicated by primary factors (e.g., more<br />
than one eruptive centre in each assemblage, differences in eruption rate and style, differences in mode<br />
and environment <strong>of</strong> emplacement) and secondary factors (e.g., metamorphism, alteration, structural<br />
complexity). However, <strong>the</strong>re are clear lithological, geochemical, textural, and volcanological differences<br />
between <strong>the</strong> komatiitic rocks in <strong>the</strong> different assemblages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt (Table 6).<br />
The Pacaud assemblage is dominated by sheet-like flows with lesser pillowed flows. These sheetlike<br />
flows include abundant differentiated flows (ortho- to mesocumulate lower zones and poorly<br />
developed spinifex-textured upper zones) and less abundant massive flows (olivine-phyric or ortho- to<br />
61