14.11.2013 Views

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Source <strong>of</strong> Sulphur: The magma must have access to an external sulphur source to achieve early<br />

sulphide saturation and to segregate significant abundances <strong>of</strong> immiscible sulphides at a high<br />

(crustal) level;<br />

3. Dynamic System: The ores must form in a dynamic system where <strong>the</strong> magmas can interact with<br />

country rocks (to extract S) and where <strong>the</strong> sulphides can equilibrate with a sufficient amount <strong>of</strong><br />

magma to generate high chalcophile element contents in <strong>the</strong> sulphides (i.e., high R factor);<br />

4. Physical Trap: The sulphides must be concentrated in some type <strong>of</strong> physical trap (embayment,<br />

inflection).<br />

Abitibi <strong>Greenstone</strong> Belt<br />

NICKEL SULPHIDE DEPOSITS<br />

Nickel-copper-(platinum group element)(PGE) discoveries in <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt occurred<br />

sporadically, including several periods <strong>of</strong> intense exploration and discovery alternating with o<strong>the</strong>r periods<br />

with only minimal mineral exploration (Figure 25): Period I (1907–1915) included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Alexo Mine; Period II (1950–1951) included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Texmont Mine; Period III (1960–1977)<br />

included <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> Langmuir Mine (#1 and #2); and Period IV (1989–1998) included <strong>the</strong> discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dundeal Horizon, and Period V (2003 to current) includes <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> C-Zone in <strong>the</strong><br />

Bannockburn area. Thus, Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization continues to be discovered whenever <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

sufficient exploration activity.<br />

Komatiite-associated Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits, prospects and showings in <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt<br />

occur exclusively in <strong>the</strong> 2719 to 2710 Ma Kidd–Munro assemblage (e.g., Alexo, Dundonald South,<br />

Dumont, Marbridge) and <strong>the</strong> 2710 to 2703 Ma Tisdale assemblage (e.g., Langmuir, McWatters, Redstone,<br />

Texmont, Sothman, Bannockburn). No deposits have been discovered in <strong>the</strong> 2750 to 2735 Ma Pacaud<br />

assemblage and 2723 to 2720 Ma Stoughton–Roquemaure assemblage. The likely reasons for this are<br />

discussed below.<br />

The deposits almost always occur in clusters. For example, <strong>the</strong>re are 6 known deposits in <strong>the</strong> Shaw<br />

Dome, 4 in <strong>the</strong> Bannockburn area, 5 in <strong>the</strong> Dundonald area, and at least 4 in <strong>the</strong> Lamotte area. This is <strong>the</strong><br />

normal pattern for komatiite-associated Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits worldwide, exemplified by <strong>the</strong> deposits in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Kambalda–St. Ives–Tramways–Widgiemooltha–Carnilya Hill district in Western Australia (Barnes<br />

2004). Clearly, areas where only one or two deposits have been discovered, such as <strong>the</strong> Bartlett and<br />

Halliday domes, have significant potential for discovery <strong>of</strong> additional deposits.<br />

KOMATIITE PHYSICAL VOLCANOLOGY<br />

Interpreting volcanic environments is difficult as it may be complicated by primary factors (e.g., more<br />

than one eruptive centre in each assemblage, differences in eruption rate and style, differences in mode<br />

and environment <strong>of</strong> emplacement) and secondary factors (e.g., metamorphism, alteration, structural<br />

complexity). However, <strong>the</strong>re are clear lithological, geochemical, textural, and volcanological differences<br />

between <strong>the</strong> komatiitic rocks in <strong>the</strong> different assemblages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Abitibi greenstone belt (Table 6).<br />

The Pacaud assemblage is dominated by sheet-like flows with lesser pillowed flows. These sheetlike<br />

flows include abundant differentiated flows (ortho- to mesocumulate lower zones and poorly<br />

developed spinifex-textured upper zones) and less abundant massive flows (olivine-phyric or ortho- to<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!