14.11.2013 Views

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2690 Ma, are equivalent within error to <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> Krist formation felsic volcanic rocks (2685–2691.5 Ma:<br />

Ayer et al. 2003), which are known to occur at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Porcupine assemblage. These ages are also<br />

comparable to <strong>the</strong> emplacement ages <strong>of</strong> numerous calc-alkaline porphyries in <strong>the</strong> Timmins area and<br />

elsewhere (mostly 2688–2691 Ma: M.A. Hamilton, this study; Ayer et al. 2003; Gray and Hutchinson<br />

2001; Corfu et al. 1989).<br />

The youngest pair <strong>of</strong> reliable concordant single-grain analyses (A1, B3) permit a provisional<br />

maximum age <strong>of</strong> deposition for <strong>the</strong> sandstone to be estimated at approximately 2689 Ma. Ancillary in situ<br />

spot age determinations have also been carried out on 15 additional zircon grains by ion microprobe<br />

analysis (SHRIMP II), and are presented in more detail in Figure 11C and in Appendix 2. In summary,<br />

<strong>the</strong> SHRIMP data reveal detrital zircon ages as old as approximately 2750 Ma in this sample, although<br />

most cluster between ca. 2740 to 2690 Ma. The younger end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SHRIMP data spectrum corresponds<br />

closely with <strong>the</strong> youngest ages determined by TIMS (though <strong>the</strong> individual spot errors for <strong>the</strong> former are<br />

intrinsically less precise), and <strong>the</strong> most reliable age <strong>of</strong> deposition for this sandstone remains 2689 Ma.<br />

Ion microprobe analysis also yielded a single spot age determination for a grain interior at 2499±9 Ma;<br />

although <strong>the</strong> analysis is concordant (100.3%), this domain is characterized by anomalously high U (ca.<br />

1200 ppm) and <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> this age remains unclear. Fur<strong>the</strong>r analytical work is warranted to<br />

elucidate <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sparse younger apparent ages.<br />

At present, given <strong>the</strong> relatively small total number <strong>of</strong> age determinations, it is impossible to<br />

definitively conclude that <strong>the</strong> unit represents a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Porcupine assemblage and not, for example,<br />

Timiskaming assemblage. However, <strong>the</strong> present TIMS and SHRIMP evidence suggest that <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

preponderance <strong>of</strong> youngest detrital zircon grains at ca. 2690 Ma, and an absence <strong>of</strong> grains in <strong>the</strong> range<br />

2685 to 2675 Ma (which would be diagnostic <strong>of</strong> Timiskaming assemblage). Thus, it is considered most<br />

probable that <strong>the</strong> dated unit <strong>from</strong> this locality south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PDDZ represents a sandstone member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Porcupine assemblage.<br />

C88-17 Felsic volcanic, Whitney Township<br />

(NAD83, Zone 17 UTM 488920E, 5369670N; #22 on Figure 2 and Table 1)<br />

South and east <strong>of</strong> Timmins, <strong>the</strong> Shaw Dome has been shown to be cored by rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ca. 2730 to<br />

2724 Ma Deloro assemblage (cf. samples #10, #23: Table 1; Figure 2). However, in south-central<br />

Whitney Township, Corfu and Noble (1992) suggested that a felsic volcanic member <strong>of</strong> comparable age<br />

(2725±1 Ma) occurs to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast and outside <strong>of</strong> this structure (<strong>the</strong>ir sample C88-17, or “DU-2”). In<br />

order to test for possible inheritance and verify <strong>the</strong> robustness <strong>of</strong> this age, fur<strong>the</strong>r U/Pb zircon<br />

geochronology was carried out.<br />

This sample contains a large number <strong>of</strong> zircons, most <strong>of</strong> which show a relatively uniform<br />

morphology (clear, colourless, equant to slightly elongate prisms). These features cast some initial doubt<br />

on a xenocrystic control for <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> this sample. Three high-quality air-abraded prisms were analyzed<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir U and Pb isotopic compositions and <strong>the</strong> results are shown in Table A1 and Figure 6B. Data for<br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new fractions are concordant, with two having nearly identical 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ages (Z-B1, Z-F1:<br />

2724.3, 2724.2 Ma, respectively), while <strong>the</strong> third fraction, Z-B2 (dashed ellipse), shows a slightly<br />

younger but overlapping age <strong>of</strong> 2718.6 Ma. Figure 6B also shows <strong>the</strong> excellent agreement between <strong>the</strong><br />

two most concordant analyses <strong>of</strong> Corfu and Noble (1992; filled ellipses) and <strong>the</strong> older two single-grain<br />

analyses measured here. Regression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five-point collinear array <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous study with <strong>the</strong> new<br />

data (Z-B1, Z-F1) results in an upper intercept age <strong>of</strong> 2724.6±0.8 Ma (88% probability <strong>of</strong> fit; MSWD =<br />

0.4), which is identical to, but slightly more precise than, <strong>the</strong> 2725±1 Ma age <strong>of</strong> Corfu and Noble (1992).<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> fraction Z-B2 is slightly reverse discordant; though marginally younger, <strong>the</strong> difference is<br />

not statistically significant and <strong>the</strong> analysis is considered spurious.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!