Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Upper Part<br />
The upper Blake River assemblage ranges in age <strong>from</strong> 2701 to 2696 Ma and consists predominantly <strong>of</strong><br />
flows <strong>of</strong> calc-alkaline basalt and andesite, locally with bimodal tholeiitic basalt and rhyolite. The Blake<br />
River group occurs in <strong>the</strong> east-central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area and is <strong>the</strong> most voluminous part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
assemblage (see Figure 1). Goodwin (1979) identified this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Blake River group as <strong>the</strong> Misema<br />
subgroup. New mapping and geochronology indicates that <strong>the</strong> Misema subgroup in Ben Nevis Township<br />
(see “Ben Nevis Area Subprojects”) has a U/Pb age <strong>of</strong> 2696.6±1.3 Ma (Figure 4A). This is younger than<br />
<strong>the</strong> pre-cauldron phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Noranda subgroup (2701±1 Ma: Mortensen 1993b), younger than <strong>the</strong><br />
Misema subgroup in Pontiac Township (2701±2 Ma: Corfu et al. 1989), and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same age as <strong>the</strong> postcauldron<br />
phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Noranda subgroup (<strong>the</strong> Reneault–Dufresnoy formation: 2697.9+1.3/–0.7 Ma<br />
(Mortensen 1993b) and 2696±1.1 Ma (Lafrance, Moorhead and Davis 2003; and <strong>the</strong> Bousquet formation:<br />
2698.6±1.5 Ma, 2698.0±1.5 Ma and 2694±2 Ma (Lafrance, Moorhead and Davis 2003). Thus, <strong>the</strong> Ben<br />
Nevis–Clifford volcanic complex formed late in <strong>the</strong> Blake River group volcanic event.<br />
The new mapping and geochronology in <strong>the</strong> Kamiskotia area has resulted in revision to <strong>the</strong><br />
stratigraphy proposed in this area by Ayer, Amelin et al. (2002). The volcanic rocks in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part<br />
<strong>of</strong> this area are assigned to <strong>the</strong> Kamiskotia Volcanic Complex (KVC) (see “Kamiskotia Area<br />
Subprojects”). The known VMS deposits in <strong>the</strong> study area occur within a restricted, east-facing<br />
stratigraphic interval in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KVC. New U/Pb ages for this interval, ranging <strong>from</strong><br />
2701.1±1.4 to 2698.6±1.3 Ma (Figures 3D, 3E and 3F) and, thus, indicate that it correlates better with <strong>the</strong><br />
upper Blake River assemblage, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> Tisdale assemblage (cf. Ayer, Amelin et al. 2002). The<br />
VMS-bearing KVC unit is interpreted to unconformably overlie <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kidd–Munro<br />
assemblage to <strong>the</strong> south based on an age gap <strong>of</strong> about 12 my (see Figure 2). An as yet unreported age <strong>of</strong><br />
2700 Ma <strong>from</strong> a heterolithic volcanic unit in <strong>the</strong> hanging wall west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kidd Creek deposit (W.<br />
Bleeker, Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Canada, personal communication, 2005) suggests an interesting spatial<br />
association between VMS deposits and <strong>the</strong> proposed unconformable contact between <strong>the</strong> upper Blake<br />
River and <strong>the</strong> upper Kidd–Munro assemblages in both <strong>the</strong> Kamiskotia and Kidd Creek areas.<br />
PORCUPINE ASSEMBLAGE<br />
The Porcupine assemblage ranges in age <strong>from</strong> 2690 to about 2685 Ma and is, thus, similar to many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
porphyries and syntectonic intrusions (discussed below). The assemblage consists predominantly <strong>of</strong><br />
wacke, siltstone and mudstone displaying Bouma sequence subdivisions indicating predominantly distal<br />
deposition by turbidity currents, but locally also containing calc-alkaline felsic volcanic rocks,<br />
conglomerates and iron formation. The age range has been revised <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> previously published range <strong>of</strong><br />
2696 to 2692 Ma (Ayer, Amelin et al. 2002) based on a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> new geochronology over<br />
<strong>the</strong> past few years. However, <strong>the</strong> absolute minimum age limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assemblage is difficult to determine<br />
precisely because <strong>the</strong> uppermost portions <strong>of</strong> this assemblage are clastic sedimentary rocks in which <strong>the</strong><br />
zircons are <strong>of</strong> detrital origin and, thus, provide only <strong>the</strong> maximum age <strong>of</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> units.<br />
Timmins Area<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> distinctive sedimentary and volcanic units that are now included within <strong>the</strong> Porcupine<br />
assemblage have been given stratigraphic names in <strong>the</strong> past including <strong>the</strong> Krist, Hoyle, Beatty and<br />
Whitney formations (Born 1995).<br />
31