14.11.2013 Views

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

Overview of Results from the Greenstone ... - Geology Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Corfu, Jackson and Sutcliffe (1991) sampled a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-marine association facies<br />

sedimentary rocks in <strong>the</strong> Kirkland Lake and Larder Lake areas and determined <strong>the</strong>ir maximum age <strong>of</strong><br />

deposition to be about 2679 Ma. More recent geochronology <strong>from</strong> a turbidite sample interbedded with<br />

heterolithic conglomerate beds and minor oxide-iron formation <strong>from</strong> McVittie Township, east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town<br />

<strong>of</strong> Larder Lake, yielded detrital zircon ages <strong>of</strong> 2674.3±3.7 Ma and 2684.9±1.9 Ma (Ayer, Ketchum and<br />

Trowell 2002) indicating that at least this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> re-sedimented association belongs to <strong>the</strong><br />

Timiskaming assemblage as was originally interpreted by Hyde (1980). New geochronology <strong>of</strong> a wacke<br />

sample <strong>from</strong> Gauthier Township yielded detrital zircons ranging <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> youngest at 2677.7±3.1 Ma, to<br />

2682 Ma and 2770 Ma (#32: Table 1, Figure 7D)and a sample <strong>of</strong> trachyte flow <strong>from</strong> this area yielded an<br />

even younger zircon age <strong>of</strong> 2669.6±1.4 Ma with inheritance zircons having ages <strong>of</strong> 2676.6±4.3 Ma and<br />

2694.2±2.8 Ma (#31: Table 1, Figure 7C). These ages indicate that <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Timiskaming<br />

assemblage in this area is as young as 2670 Ma, similar to <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Three Nations formation east <strong>of</strong><br />

Timmins (see above).<br />

Matachewan Area<br />

A unit <strong>of</strong> conglomerate and cross-bedded sandstone, locally associated with turbiditic sedimentary rocks,<br />

extends west <strong>from</strong> Cairo Township to south <strong>of</strong> Hutt Township (see Figure 2). A number <strong>of</strong> geochronology<br />

samples were analyzed <strong>from</strong> this unit in order to determine its age and provenance (Ayer, Ketchum and<br />

Trowell 2002). The youngest detrital zircon <strong>from</strong> a sandstone in Powell Township has an age <strong>of</strong><br />

2685.8±1.5 Ma, as well as older detrital zircons with ages <strong>of</strong> 2692.3±2.7 Ma, 2695.2±2.4 Ma and<br />

2757±12 Ma. A second sample was collected <strong>from</strong> fine-grained wacke interbedded with conglomerate<br />

south <strong>of</strong> Montrose Township. The youngest zircon indicates a maximum deposition age <strong>of</strong> 2688.5±1.0<br />

Ma, whereas a number <strong>of</strong> older detrital zircons range <strong>from</strong> 2690 to 2723 Ma. The youngest detrital<br />

zircons, <strong>from</strong> sandstone interbedded with conglomerate south <strong>of</strong> Hutt Township, indicate a maximum<br />

depositional age <strong>of</strong> 2690±3.0 Ma also with detrital zircons with ages <strong>of</strong> 2706 and 2715 Ma (Ayer, Amelin<br />

et al. 2002). The above U/Pb zircon data indicate that <strong>the</strong>se sedimentary units were deposited sometime<br />

after 2685.8±1.5 Ma and that only Abitibi-age zircons have been detected to date. Thus, <strong>the</strong>y could<br />

belong to ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Porcupine or <strong>the</strong> Timiskaming assemblages given <strong>the</strong> time limits established for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

assemblages as discussed above. However, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facies association <strong>of</strong> localized fluvial<br />

conglomerates and cross-bedded sandstones and <strong>the</strong> strong spatial association with <strong>the</strong> Larder Lake–<br />

Cadillac deformation zone (LLCDZ), <strong>the</strong> unit is still considered to be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Timiskaming<br />

assemblage.<br />

In contrast with <strong>the</strong> Porcupine, <strong>the</strong> Timiskaming assemblage samples (see below) commonly contain<br />

detrital zircons with pre-Abitibi ages (i.e., 2860–2790 Ma). These ages indicate a more widespread<br />

provenance that included source terrains older than <strong>the</strong> Abitibi. These sources could have included<br />

detritus <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Opatica Subprovince to <strong>the</strong> north, or unknown older terrains to <strong>the</strong> south or east which<br />

would have been subsequently removed by collision with <strong>the</strong> Grenville Province during <strong>the</strong> Proterozoic.<br />

However, new evidence <strong>of</strong> pre-Abitibi U/Pb ages <strong>of</strong> zircon xenocrysts, and ancient crustally contaminated<br />

Nd and Hf isotopes (Ketchum et al., in press) in some volcanic and plutonic samples only found to date in<br />

<strong>the</strong> westernmost part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SAGB, suggests that pre-Abitibi crust, similar in age to <strong>the</strong> lowermost part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Wawa supracrustal sequences, may have underlain <strong>the</strong> AGB in a wedge extending up to 80 km east <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Kapuskasing Structural Zone (Ketchum et al., in press). This suggests <strong>the</strong> strong possibility that <strong>the</strong><br />

Wawa Subprovince may have contributed at least some <strong>of</strong> this pre-Abitibi detritus to <strong>the</strong> Timiskaming.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!