23.11.2013 Views

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NICK COOK 135<br />

jet flap on takeoff and it was the same as if the wing area had been substantially<br />

increased, with a parallel reduction in drag and a concomitant<br />

improvement in lift—by perhaps as much as 30 percent.<br />

Bingo.<br />

This could explain how the B-2, or an aircraft like it, staggered into the<br />

air with a full bomb-and-fuel load. Thirty percent seemed far too high,<br />

but even a few percentage points would constitute a breakthrough. A<br />

substantial lift improvement was the equivalent of a substantial reduction<br />

in weight. Maybe the B-2 lost weight, so to speak, aerodynamically, not<br />

electrogravitically. It would explain why Northrop had beaten Lockheed<br />

to the B-2 contract. While the Skunk Works had been playing around<br />

with Maxwell's equations and two-dimensional shapes, Northrop had<br />

already worked out how an aircraft could be enveloped in a shield of static<br />

electricity and how that energy could be put to work: as both a cloaking<br />

device and a method for reducing its air resistance.<br />

No laws of physics broken, no antigravity switch in the cockpit, but an<br />

extraordinary development nonetheless.<br />

A weight reduction device by proxy.<br />

And in working this through, I realized something else. The B-2<br />

antigravity story actually played into the hands of black world security. It<br />

was so fundamentally unbelievable that it discredited any serious investigation<br />

of the application of electrostatics to aircraft. What defeated me<br />

was why the spooks should have worked so hard to stop its disclosure—<br />

pulling papers from the AIAA and so forth—and yet be content for<br />

details to be released of the Lockheed stealth method.<br />

But then, disinformation works best when you mix it in with a little<br />

truth.<br />

It was then that the picture cleared momentarily and I glimpsed something<br />

through the snow and distortion. The keywords I'd written down<br />

and then hurled into the bin in the basement of my home a few days<br />

earlier swam into focus. If I could just hold the picture a second or two<br />

longer . . .<br />

Marckus' voice, punchy and impatient on the other end of the line,<br />

brought me back to the here and now of my room in the Sahara.<br />

I'm still here, I told him.<br />

He was asking me where I was headed next.<br />

I told him there was only one possible place I could go. If Northrop<br />

had been working on electrostatics since the 1960s, if it was now<br />

operationally deployed on a $2 billion frontline bomber that had been<br />

designed in 1980, there had been plenty of time in the intervening period<br />

for improvements and refinements. I knew there was no way that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!