23.11.2013 Views

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

276 The Hunt for Zero Point<br />

orbiting space junk can also stop a reconnaissance satellite or a ballistic<br />

missile dead in its tracks. Hit a foot-wide gravity-reflecting beam at an<br />

orbiting velocity of 17,000 miles per hour and it would be no different to<br />

hitting a brick wall, except there would be no evidence to say that you had<br />

hit anything. The results, to borrow an expression from science-fiction<br />

writer Arthur C. Clarke, would be "indistinguishable from magic," the<br />

ultimate in weapons technology.<br />

Over recent years, a wealth of articles have appeared outlining the view<br />

of an emerging breed of physicists that we may indeed reside in a multidimensional<br />

cosmos. The August 2000 edition of Scientific American, for<br />

example, generated a mass of copy in newspapers here and in the States<br />

on this growing belief—that parallel universes may exist alongside our<br />

own and how additional, unseen dimensions would help to unify the<br />

fundamental forces of Nature that inhabit our four-dimensional spacetime.<br />

According to this thinking, much of it wrapped within so-called<br />

"string theory," our universe may simply exist as a membrane floating<br />

within a higher-dimensional space, with gravity—this impossibly weak,<br />

little-understood yet massively influential force—the only one of the four<br />

fundamental forces capable of propagating across the dimensions. Over<br />

the course of the next decade, experimentation may provide real answers<br />

to these tantalizing and complex suppositions. For me, it has simply<br />

served to show how taboo notions—taboo science—can, in time, enter the<br />

mainstream of ideas.<br />

As I sit here, picking over clippings related to these and other areas of<br />

research connected with this book, it has dawned on me only now that<br />

attitudes have changed in the relatively short space of time it has taken<br />

me to write it. Broadsheet newspapers from the New York Times to<br />

the Sunday Times and the Observer have all carried thought-provoking<br />

features over the past few years on zero-point energy, faster-than-light<br />

travel and other contentious areas of science. Suddenly, the idea of<br />

gravity having an antigravity component—this heresy that terrified the<br />

professional daylights out of me a decade ago—doesn't seem so strange<br />

after all.<br />

On that note, I should add that this book is in not intended to be a<br />

catchall explanation for UFOs. While it may go some way toward<br />

explaining some of the thousands of sightings that have occurred since<br />

the Second World War—many of them documented in official files—the<br />

subject is too complex, too multifarious, in my opinion, to conform to a<br />

single explanation. Although the data that Boyd Bushman encouraged<br />

me to follow to glean the truth about antigravity is sufficient for me to<br />

reach some definitive conclusions on that subject, it is inconclusive, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!