23.11.2013 Views

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NICK COOK 215<br />

a member of the "secret police"—a term Schauberger used interchangeably<br />

with "SS."<br />

In July 1941, Schauberger describes how "an intermediary" has<br />

approached him in a bid to rectify certain problems Heinkel was<br />

experiencing with the technology he had lifted from Schauberger's<br />

patent application. With ill-concealed schadenfreude', Schauberger reveals<br />

that Heinkel's engineers have made a mistake copying his design, and<br />

that he knows what the error is. Through his dialogue with the<br />

intermediary, Schauberger believes that Heinkel is trying to substitute<br />

conventional engine technology with technology of his own.<br />

On the face of it, this ought to mean one of two things: that the<br />

compressor technology of the troubled He 280's HeS 8 turbojets had<br />

been marked for replacement by Schauberger turbine components, the<br />

"centripetal compressors" of his successful 1936 patent application; or<br />

that Heinkel was attempting to swap complete Schauberger power-plant<br />

units for the underperforming HeS 8 turbojets.<br />

The first explanation makes little sense. Adding a "centripetal<br />

compressor"—one that causes air to flow radially inward—would have<br />

destroyed the carefully tailored flow dynamics of the HeS 8 engine,<br />

which was a centrifugal gas turbine based on a principle diametrically<br />

opposed to the Schauberger implosion technique.<br />

The second explanation is equally vexing. Strapping Schauberger's<br />

engines, which worked on a suction principle, onto the He 280 would<br />

have made a total nonsense of the aircraft's graceful aerodynamics.<br />

History, in any case, tells us that the Air Ministry (RLM) would give<br />

the He 280 a production order only if Heinkel substituted the HeS 8<br />

engine for BMW 003 or Jumo 004 axial-flow turbojets. Neither of these<br />

would fit, so the entire project was scrapped.<br />

There has never been any mention in Heinkel files, so far as I am<br />

aware, of any association between the He 280 project and Viktor<br />

Schauberger.<br />

This process of elimination allowed me to entertain the notion with<br />

greater confidence than I had earlier that Heinkel had been working on<br />

some altogether different form of air vehicle—one that would have<br />

worked best with a Schauberger engine, not a gas turbine; and one that<br />

has never come to light.<br />

It is interesting to note that the legend of the Schriever Flying Top<br />

makes specific mention of the fact that construction of full-sized discshaped<br />

vehicles was transferred from Heinkel's Marienehe facility at<br />

Rostock to Czechoslovakia in 1943.<br />

From late 1941, Schauberger's correspondence makes it plain that he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!