23.11.2013 Views

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

ScienceDirect - Technol Rep Tohoku Univ ... - Garryck Osborne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 The Hunt for Zero Point<br />

U-2 spyplane (which first flew in 1955, but is still in service), a singleengined<br />

aircraft intended for ultra-long endurance missions (and hardly,<br />

therefore, a maneuvering type like the discs reported to Twining), had a<br />

maximum unrefueled range in excess of 3,000 miles—3,500, perhaps, on<br />

a good day.<br />

And, needless to say, no one had ever owned up to building a flying<br />

saucer.<br />

To construct the "aircraft" that Twining had in mind, he told General<br />

Schulgen: "Any developments in this country along the lines indicated<br />

would be extremely expensive, time-consuming and at the considerable<br />

expense of other projects and therefore, if directed, should be set up<br />

independently of existing projects."<br />

Placing such a project outside the mainstream of aerospace science<br />

brought to mind the effort that had resulted in the development of<br />

the first atomic bomb. In 1956, George Trimble had also cited the<br />

Manhattan Project as the inspiration for his proposed antigravity<br />

program. Brown, too, had offered a highly unusual development model<br />

for Winterhaven, his Mach 3 antigravity program, one that only peripherally<br />

involved the U.S. aerospace industry.<br />

I tried to keep my mind on the facts. The essential point of Twining's<br />

memo was that the development of an aircraft exhibiting the characteristics<br />

of the saucers that people were seeing in 1947 was "within the<br />

present U.S. knowledge," but that the craft themselves were nothing to<br />

do with the USAAF. Then whose were they?<br />

Twining himself offered two possibilities. First, that they were of<br />

"domestic origin—the product of some high security project not known<br />

to AC/AS-2 (air force technical intelligence) or this Command." And<br />

second, "that some foreign nation has a form of propulsion, possibly<br />

nuclear, which is outside of our domestic knowledge."<br />

The first part I actually found a little scary. Twining was entertaining<br />

the possibility that these craft had been developed and fielded by another<br />

branch of the U.S. armed forces—the Navy, perhaps—without the<br />

knowledge of the USAAF.<br />

The second explanation was, at least, a little more conventional. The<br />

discs, Twining offered, were the result of another country's secret<br />

development effort.<br />

I had been sucked into a story that seemed to have had its origins in<br />

1956. Reluctantly, I now had to concede that if I was to do this thing any<br />

justice at all, I needed to cast the net back even further.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!