07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.4. DEGENERACY OF QUARTER-BPS DYONIC BLACK HOLES 7<br />

degeneracy does not depend on the moduli and it jumps by a known amount once the moduli<br />

cross the boundary of the domain (these boundaries are usually called the walls of marginal<br />

stability).Therefore the dependence on such mixed invariants can be determined in terms of<br />

jumps across the walls of marginal stability. This makes the job somewhat easier. One can<br />

calculate the degeneracy for a specific charge vector and then can extend the result to other<br />

charge vectors by duality symmetry. This turns out to be crucial for what we are going to do<br />

in the next few chapters.<br />

We shall now state the result for the degeneracy of quarter-BPS dyonic black holes<br />

carrying charges (Q, P ) [7]. Let d(Q, P ) stand for the degenaracy in a specific domain of the<br />

moduli space. Then,<br />

d(Q, P ) = (−1) Q·P +1 ∫<br />

C<br />

dρdσdve −iπ(σQ2 +ρP 2 +2vQ·P ) 1<br />

Φ 10 (ρ, σ, v)<br />

(1.4.6)<br />

where C is the contour of integration in three complex dimensional space parametrized by (ρ, σ,<br />

v) and<br />

0 ≤ ρ 1 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ σ 1 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ v 1 ≤ 1, ρ 2 = M 1 , σ 2 = M 2 , v 2 = M 3 , (1.4.7)<br />

M 1 , M 2 and M 3 are three real constants. Φ 10 is the unique weight ten Igusa cusp form of<br />

Sp(2, Z) and it is invariant under both T and S duality transformations. The effect of the<br />

asymptotic moduli is contained in the choice of the contour of integration. We have already<br />

seen that the degeneracy in a given domain does not depend on the asymptotic moduli, but<br />

it can jump if we cross a wall of marginal stability. There exists a specific moduli dependent<br />

choice of contour [46] which beautifully captures both the moduli independence in a given<br />

domain and the wall crossing phenomenon. It is given by,<br />

where,<br />

{<br />

ρ 2<br />

|τ| 2<br />

= Λ +<br />

τ 2<br />

{<br />

σ 2<br />

1<br />

= Λ +<br />

τ 2<br />

{<br />

v 2 = −Λ<br />

τ 1<br />

+<br />

τ 2<br />

}<br />

Q 2 R<br />

√<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

R<br />

PR 2 − (Q ,<br />

R · P R ) 2<br />

}<br />

PR<br />

2 √<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

R<br />

PR 2 − (Q ,<br />

R · P R ) 2<br />

}<br />

Q R · P<br />

√ R<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

R<br />

PR 2 − (Q , (1.4.8)<br />

R · P R ) 2<br />

Q 2 R = Q T (M + L)Q, P 2 R = P T (M + L)P, Q R · P R = Q T (M + L)P . (1.4.9)<br />

For Λ sufficiently large it gives us the correct contour of integration associated with a<br />

specific value of the moduli M and τ. As long as we are varying the moduli inside a given

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!