07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5. EXAMPLES 71<br />

On the other hand the electric partition function can be calculated by analyzing the untwisted<br />

sector BPS spectrum of the fundamental heterotic string [64–67]. After taking into account the<br />

fact that we are computing the partition function of odd Q 2 /2 states only, and the ˇσ → ˇσ s /2<br />

replacement, the result is<br />

φ −1<br />

e (ˇσ) = 1 2 (ψ e(ˇσ s ) − ψ e (ˇσ s + 1)) ,<br />

[ 1 (<br />

ψ e (ˇσ s ) = 8 η(ˇσ s /2) −24 ϑ2 (ˇσ s ) 8 + ϑ 3 (ˇσ s ) 8 + ϑ 4 (ˇσ s ) 8) ]<br />

− ϑ 3 (ˇσ s /2) 4 ϑ 4 (ˇσ s /2) 4 .<br />

2<br />

(4.5.5.12)<br />

In (4.5.5.12) ψ e describes the partition function before projecting on to the odd Q 2 /2 sector [65].<br />

φ m (ˇρ s ) given( in (4.5.5.11) ) transforms as a modular form of weight 8 under ˇρ s → (αˇρ s +<br />

α β<br />

β)/(γ ˇρ s + δ) with ∈ Γ<br />

γ δ 0 (2) with a multiplier (−1) β . On the other hand φ e (ˇσ) given in<br />

(4.5.5.12) ( can)<br />

be shown to transform as a modular form of weight 8 under ˇσ s → (pˇσ s +q)/(rˇσ s +<br />

p q<br />

s) for ∈ Γ<br />

r s 0 (2), with a multiplier (−1) q . These duality symmetries correspond to the<br />

symplectic transformations<br />

⎛<br />

⎞ ⎛<br />

⎞<br />

α 0 β 0<br />

1 0 0 0<br />

⎜ 0 1 0 0<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ γ 0 δ 0 ⎠ and ⎜ 0 p 0 q<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠ ,<br />

0 0 0 1<br />

0 r 0 s<br />

acting on (ˇρ s , ˇσ s , ˇv s ).<br />

αδ − βγ = 1, ps − qr = 1, α, β, δ, p, q, s ∈ Z, γ, r ∈ 2 Z , (4.5.5.13)<br />

Since for the set B the ( S-duality ) group ( is Γ(2), ) in this case there is another wall of marginal<br />

a0 b<br />

stability, associated with<br />

0 1 1<br />

= , which cannot be related to the previous wall<br />

c 0 d 0 0 1<br />

by an S-duality transformation. This corresponds to the decay (Q, P ) → (Q − P, 0) + (P, P )<br />

and controls the behaviour of ̂Φ near ˇv + ˇσ = 0. As usual we first need to determine if there<br />

are any subtleties of the type mentioned below eq.(4.3.11). Eq.(4.5.5.1) ⎛ shows that for ⎞ a given<br />

−(2K + 1)<br />

(Q−P ) 2 = 4(K +J −m) there is an infinite family of (Q−P ) = ⎜ (2m − 2J + 1)/2<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ −1 ⎠ labelled<br />

−2<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

1 0 0 K<br />

by 2K. However all of these can be related by T-duality transformation ⎜ 0 1 −K 0<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠<br />

0 0 0 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!