PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.5. EXAMPLES 71<br />
On the other hand the electric partition function can be calculated by analyzing the untwisted<br />
sector BPS spectrum of the fundamental heterotic string [64–67]. After taking into account the<br />
fact that we are computing the partition function of odd Q 2 /2 states only, and the ˇσ → ˇσ s /2<br />
replacement, the result is<br />
φ −1<br />
e (ˇσ) = 1 2 (ψ e(ˇσ s ) − ψ e (ˇσ s + 1)) ,<br />
[ 1 (<br />
ψ e (ˇσ s ) = 8 η(ˇσ s /2) −24 ϑ2 (ˇσ s ) 8 + ϑ 3 (ˇσ s ) 8 + ϑ 4 (ˇσ s ) 8) ]<br />
− ϑ 3 (ˇσ s /2) 4 ϑ 4 (ˇσ s /2) 4 .<br />
2<br />
(4.5.5.12)<br />
In (4.5.5.12) ψ e describes the partition function before projecting on to the odd Q 2 /2 sector [65].<br />
φ m (ˇρ s ) given( in (4.5.5.11) ) transforms as a modular form of weight 8 under ˇρ s → (αˇρ s +<br />
α β<br />
β)/(γ ˇρ s + δ) with ∈ Γ<br />
γ δ 0 (2) with a multiplier (−1) β . On the other hand φ e (ˇσ) given in<br />
(4.5.5.12) ( can)<br />
be shown to transform as a modular form of weight 8 under ˇσ s → (pˇσ s +q)/(rˇσ s +<br />
p q<br />
s) for ∈ Γ<br />
r s 0 (2), with a multiplier (−1) q . These duality symmetries correspond to the<br />
symplectic transformations<br />
⎛<br />
⎞ ⎛<br />
⎞<br />
α 0 β 0<br />
1 0 0 0<br />
⎜ 0 1 0 0<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ γ 0 δ 0 ⎠ and ⎜ 0 p 0 q<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠ ,<br />
0 0 0 1<br />
0 r 0 s<br />
acting on (ˇρ s , ˇσ s , ˇv s ).<br />
αδ − βγ = 1, ps − qr = 1, α, β, δ, p, q, s ∈ Z, γ, r ∈ 2 Z , (4.5.5.13)<br />
Since for the set B the ( S-duality ) group ( is Γ(2), ) in this case there is another wall of marginal<br />
a0 b<br />
stability, associated with<br />
0 1 1<br />
= , which cannot be related to the previous wall<br />
c 0 d 0 0 1<br />
by an S-duality transformation. This corresponds to the decay (Q, P ) → (Q − P, 0) + (P, P )<br />
and controls the behaviour of ̂Φ near ˇv + ˇσ = 0. As usual we first need to determine if there<br />
are any subtleties of the type mentioned below eq.(4.3.11). Eq.(4.5.5.1) ⎛ shows that for ⎞ a given<br />
−(2K + 1)<br />
(Q−P ) 2 = 4(K +J −m) there is an infinite family of (Q−P ) = ⎜ (2m − 2J + 1)/2<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ −1 ⎠ labelled<br />
−2<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
1 0 0 K<br />
by 2K. However all of these can be related by T-duality transformation ⎜ 0 1 −K 0<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠<br />
0 0 0 1