07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 CHAPTER 4. GENERALITIES OF QUARTER BPS DYON PARTITION FUNCTION<br />

Now suppose b in (4.5.5.6) is even. Then we can apply a T-duality transformation on the<br />

charge vector given in (4.5.5.6) with the matrix<br />

⎛<br />

⎞ ⎛<br />

⎞<br />

1 l 0 d −2c<br />

⎜ 1 −l 0<br />

⎟ ⎜ −b/2 a<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ 0 1 ⎠ ⎝<br />

a b/2 ⎠ , l 0 ≡ 1 2 bd(2K + 1) − c {(2m + 1)a + 2bJ} .<br />

2<br />

0 1<br />

2c d<br />

(4.5.5.8)<br />

It is straightfoward to verify that this brings (4.5.5.6) back to the set A consisting of pairs of<br />

charge vectors of the form given in (4.5.5.1). ( This)<br />

shows that a sufficient condition for (4.5.5.6)<br />

a b<br />

to lie in the set B is to have b even, ı.e. ∈ Γ(2). Using (4.2.2) we can also see that<br />

c d<br />

this condition is necessary since acting on a pair (Q, P ) with Q 2 /2 odd, P 2 /2 odd and Q · P<br />

even, an S-duality transformation produces a (Q ′ , P ′ ) with odd Q ′2 /2 only if b is even.<br />

Thus we identify the subgroup Γ(2) of the S-duality group Γ 0 (2) as the symmetry of<br />

the set B. The overall scaling of Q and P does not change the symmetry group. Thus the<br />

quarter BPS dyon partition function associated with the set B must be invariant under the<br />

Γ(2) S-duality symmetry. This in turn corresponds to symplectic transformations of the form<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

d b 0 0<br />

c a 0 0<br />

0 0 a −c<br />

0 0 −b d<br />

acting on (ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) and also on (ˇρ s , ˇσ s , ˇv s ).<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ , ad − bc = 1, a, d ∈ Z, b, c ∈ 2 Z , (4.5.5.9)<br />

Next we turn to the analysis of the constraints from wall crossing. First consider the wall<br />

corresponding to the decay (Q, P ) → (Q, 0) + (0, P ), and examine whether there are subtleties<br />

of kind mentioned below eq.(4.3.11) in applying eqs.(4.3.9), (4.3.10). For this we note that<br />

here Q 2 = −2(2m + 1) and P 2 = 2(2K + 1) are uncorrelated. For a given Q 2 = −2(2m + 1)<br />

there is a unique charge vector in the list given in (4.5.5.1). On the other hand even though<br />

for a given P 2 = 2(2K + 1) there is an infinite family of P labelled by J, they are all related<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

⎛<br />

1 0 0 −J<br />

by the T-duality transformation matrix ⎜ 0 1 J 0<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠ to the vector ⎜<br />

⎝<br />

0 0 0 1<br />

there are no subtleties of the kind mentioned below (4.3.11) and we have<br />

2K + 1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ . Thus<br />

̂Φ(ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) ∝ {ˇv 2 φ m (ˇρ)φ e (ˇσ) + O(ˇv 4 ) } for ˇv ≃ 0 . (4.5.5.10)<br />

The magnetic partition function is obtained from (4.5.4.4) by projection to odd values of P 2 /2<br />

followed by ˇρ → ˇρ s /2 replacement. This gives<br />

φ m (ˇρ) −1 = 1 2<br />

{<br />

η(ˇρs /2) −8 η(ˇρ s ) −8 − η((ˇρ s + 1)/2) −8 η(ˇρ s ) −8} . (4.5.5.11)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!