07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may not be convergent in another region. The coefficients of expansion in these different<br />

regions in the complex (ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) plane may then be regarded as the index f(Q 2 , P 2 , Q · P )<br />

in different domains in the asymptotic moduli space labelled by ⃗c. We shall assume that<br />

this result holds for all sets of dyons in all N = 4 string theories.<br />

2. Consequences of S-duality symmetry: We now consider the effect of an S-duality<br />

transformation on the set B. A generic S-duality transformation will take an element<br />

of B to outside B, – we denote by H the subgroup of the S-duality group that leaves<br />

B invariant. This is the subgroup relevant for constraining the dyon partition function<br />

associated with the set B. Since a generic element of H takes us from one domain<br />

bounded by walls of marginal stability to another such domain, it relates the function<br />

f for one choice of ⃗c to the function f for another choice of ⃗c. However since we have<br />

assumed that the dyon partition function 1/̂Φ is independent of the domain label ⃗c, we<br />

can use invariance under H to constrain the form of ̂Φ. In particular ( one finds ) that an<br />

a b<br />

S-duality symmetry of the form (Q, P ) → (aQ + bP, cQ + dP ) with ∈ H gives<br />

c d<br />

the following constraint on ̂Φ:<br />

̂Φ(ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) = ̂Φ(d 2 ˇρ + b 2ˇσ + 2bdˇv, c 2 ˇρ + a 2ˇσ + 2acˇv, cdˇρ + abˇσ + (ad + bc)ˇv) . (4.0.4)<br />

33<br />

Defining<br />

we can express (4.0.4) as<br />

( )<br />

ˇρ ˇv ˇΩ = , (4.0.5)<br />

ˇv ˇσ<br />

where<br />

̂Φ((AˇΩ + B)(C ˇΩ + D) −1 ) = (det(C ˇΩ + D)) k ̂Φ(Ω) , (4.0.6)<br />

⎛<br />

( )<br />

A B<br />

= ⎜<br />

C D ⎝<br />

d b 0 0<br />

c a 0 0<br />

0 0 a −c<br />

0 0 −b d<br />

and k is as yet undermined since det(CΩ + D) = 1.<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠ , (4.0.7)<br />

Besides this symmetry, quantization of Q 2 , P 2 and Q · P within the set B also gives rise<br />

to some translational symmetries of ̂Φ of the form ̂Φ(ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) = ̂Φ(ˇρ + a 1 , ˇσ + a 2 , ˇv + a 3 )<br />

with a 1 , a 2 , a 3 taking values in an appropriate set. These can also be expressed as (4.0.6)<br />

with<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

( )<br />

1 0 a 1 a 3<br />

A B<br />

= ⎜ 0 1 a 3 a 2<br />

⎟<br />

C D ⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠ . (4.0.8)<br />

0 0 0 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!