PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
PHYS08200604018 Shamik Banerjee - Homi Bhabha National ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
may not be convergent in another region. The coefficients of expansion in these different<br />
regions in the complex (ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) plane may then be regarded as the index f(Q 2 , P 2 , Q · P )<br />
in different domains in the asymptotic moduli space labelled by ⃗c. We shall assume that<br />
this result holds for all sets of dyons in all N = 4 string theories.<br />
2. Consequences of S-duality symmetry: We now consider the effect of an S-duality<br />
transformation on the set B. A generic S-duality transformation will take an element<br />
of B to outside B, – we denote by H the subgroup of the S-duality group that leaves<br />
B invariant. This is the subgroup relevant for constraining the dyon partition function<br />
associated with the set B. Since a generic element of H takes us from one domain<br />
bounded by walls of marginal stability to another such domain, it relates the function<br />
f for one choice of ⃗c to the function f for another choice of ⃗c. However since we have<br />
assumed that the dyon partition function 1/̂Φ is independent of the domain label ⃗c, we<br />
can use invariance under H to constrain the form of ̂Φ. In particular ( one finds ) that an<br />
a b<br />
S-duality symmetry of the form (Q, P ) → (aQ + bP, cQ + dP ) with ∈ H gives<br />
c d<br />
the following constraint on ̂Φ:<br />
̂Φ(ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) = ̂Φ(d 2 ˇρ + b 2ˇσ + 2bdˇv, c 2 ˇρ + a 2ˇσ + 2acˇv, cdˇρ + abˇσ + (ad + bc)ˇv) . (4.0.4)<br />
33<br />
Defining<br />
we can express (4.0.4) as<br />
( )<br />
ˇρ ˇv ˇΩ = , (4.0.5)<br />
ˇv ˇσ<br />
where<br />
̂Φ((AˇΩ + B)(C ˇΩ + D) −1 ) = (det(C ˇΩ + D)) k ̂Φ(Ω) , (4.0.6)<br />
⎛<br />
( )<br />
A B<br />
= ⎜<br />
C D ⎝<br />
d b 0 0<br />
c a 0 0<br />
0 0 a −c<br />
0 0 −b d<br />
and k is as yet undermined since det(CΩ + D) = 1.<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
⎠ , (4.0.7)<br />
Besides this symmetry, quantization of Q 2 , P 2 and Q · P within the set B also gives rise<br />
to some translational symmetries of ̂Φ of the form ̂Φ(ˇρ, ˇσ, ˇv) = ̂Φ(ˇρ + a 1 , ˇσ + a 2 , ˇv + a 3 )<br />
with a 1 , a 2 , a 3 taking values in an appropriate set. These can also be expressed as (4.0.6)<br />
with<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
( )<br />
1 0 a 1 a 3<br />
A B<br />
= ⎜ 0 1 a 3 a 2<br />
⎟<br />
C D ⎝ 0 0 1 0 ⎠ . (4.0.8)<br />
0 0 0 1