08.01.2014 Views

Final Report on RREF 2001 - Department of Health

Final Report on RREF 2001 - Department of Health

Final Report on RREF 2001 - Department of Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part C: Outcomes<br />

6.3 FURTHER ISSUES AND VIEWS ON OUTCOMES<br />

• There was wide agreement in the Round 2 C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>s that the patterns <strong>of</strong> need shown by<br />

the need weightings at regi<strong>on</strong>al level and for LGAs reflected experience in the field. Three<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the results were noted in particular:<br />

1. The relatively limited gradati<strong>on</strong> in the average need weightings across the nine<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>s;<br />

2. The more marked variati<strong>on</strong>s between LGAs within regi<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />

3. The insights into variati<strong>on</strong>s in need within regi<strong>on</strong>s provided by the LGA data<br />

compiled for the <strong>RREF</strong> and the value <strong>of</strong> having this data available for use in<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>al and local planning.<br />

6.4 REVISED REGIONAL OUTCOMES OF WEIGHTING FOR NEED VARIABLES<br />

Average weightings across all LGAs in each regi<strong>on</strong> are ranked as set out in Table 6.1. While<br />

there was a 29% difference between the lowest and highest average percentage weightings, from<br />

18% to 47%, seven <strong>of</strong> the nine regi<strong>on</strong>s were within a range <strong>of</strong> 13%. All rural regi<strong>on</strong>s receive a<br />

weighting <strong>of</strong> at least 30%.<br />

Table 6.1: Average Weightings for Regi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Rank<br />

Regi<strong>on</strong><br />

Weighting<br />

Average for all Lowest Highest Range<br />

LGAs<br />

LGA LGA<br />

Lowest Eastern Metropolitan 18 11 27 16<br />

Southern Metropolitan 26 9 51 42<br />

Northern Metropolitan 35 ) 9 56 47<br />

Western Metropolitan 36 ) 18 58 40<br />

Barw<strong>on</strong> South Western 39 ) 7 regi<strong>on</strong>s 29 44 15<br />

Hume 39 ) within 12% 29 47 18<br />

Grampians 43 ) range 29 58 29<br />

Gippsland 44 ) 34 67 33<br />

Highest Lodd<strong>on</strong>-Mallee 47 ) 24 71 47<br />

The highest and lowest LGA weightings within each regi<strong>on</strong> show that there is as much variati<strong>on</strong><br />

between LGAs within each regi<strong>on</strong> as between regi<strong>on</strong>s. The highest score for any individual<br />

LGA was 32/45, giving a weighting <strong>of</strong> 71%, and the lowest was 4/45, giving a weighting <strong>of</strong> 9%.<br />

Comparis<strong>on</strong>s that highlight this intra-regi<strong>on</strong>al variati<strong>on</strong>s are:<br />

• The Eastern Metropolitan regi<strong>on</strong> is characterised by less variati<strong>on</strong> within the regi<strong>on</strong>;<br />

further, the highest need weighting for any LGA in this regi<strong>on</strong>, 24%, is comparable<br />

to the lowest need weighting in the five rural regi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

• Barw<strong>on</strong> South Western and Hume have similar lowest and highest LGA need<br />

weightings and there is less variati<strong>on</strong> between LGAs within these regi<strong>on</strong>s, less than<br />

20%.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Final</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> July <strong>2001</strong> 70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!