17.01.2014 Views

MASTER THESIS Biomimetic potential of sponge ... - IAP/TU Wien

MASTER THESIS Biomimetic potential of sponge ... - IAP/TU Wien

MASTER THESIS Biomimetic potential of sponge ... - IAP/TU Wien

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For tropical and temperate regions, another type <strong>of</strong> daylight guidance system is<br />

attractive: Anidolic light guides. Courret and colleagues (1998) proposed to introduce an<br />

additional ceiling that is connected to a tilted façade element that collects light for<br />

redistribution in the <strong>of</strong>fice space. The protruding façade element contains a collector that<br />

diverts the incident sunlight by non-imaging (anidolic) optics deeper into the building where<br />

another anidolic element releases the light into the room. The authors suggest that under<br />

overcast conditions, and in a typical urban, obstructed landscape this system provides 2-3<br />

times better lighting deep inside buildings than conventional windows. Additionally, the<br />

provided light reportedly makes for high visual comfort, and the system could be installed<br />

when retr<strong>of</strong>itting <strong>of</strong>fice buildings.<br />

Commercially available systems<br />

Most common light guidance systems on the market, though, rely on a quite<br />

straightforward approach. Daylight is conducted from the ro<strong>of</strong>top or façade and conducted<br />

by optical fibres or tubular light ducts deep into the building (Figure 25). Some more recent<br />

products aim at intertwining artificial and natural light to provide reliable lighting through a<br />

single integrated system. Commercially available hybrid systems currently include Himawari<br />

(himawari-net.co.jp), Parans (parans.com), Hybrid Solar Lighting (HSL) ((sunlight-direct.com)<br />

and the SCIS Solar Canopy Illuminance System (lightinglab.fi).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these systems employ active collectors that track the sun (Himawari, HSL) while<br />

other rely on stationary light collectors. A further difference is the mounting location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

different systems. While Himawari and Parans can be mounted both on ro<strong>of</strong>tops and<br />

façades, the other lighting systems are restricted to either ro<strong>of</strong> (HSL) or façade (SCIS).<br />

Commonly these systems can conduct light over distances not exceeding 20 metres<br />

(parans.com) (himawari-net.co.jp). Thus a combination <strong>of</strong> both mounting locations (ro<strong>of</strong> and<br />

wall) would be desirable for implementation in high rise <strong>of</strong>fice buildings.<br />

Mayhoub and Carter (2011) simulated the use <strong>of</strong> three commercially available hybrid<br />

lighting systems (HSL, Parans and SCIS) under a variety <strong>of</strong> conditions relevant for all climatic<br />

regions ranging from cold, fully humid over temperate and sub-tropic to arid and tropical<br />

regions. They discovered great <strong>potential</strong> for improvement <strong>of</strong> these systems, as all systems<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!