28.01.2014 Views

azu_td_1349475_sip1_... - Arizona Campus Repository

azu_td_1349475_sip1_... - Arizona Campus Repository

azu_td_1349475_sip1_... - Arizona Campus Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Photoresist Thickness (|xm)<br />

50<br />

Speed (rpm) Experimental Values Manufacturer's Values<br />

3000 1.2 1.23<br />

4000 1.09 1.06<br />

5000 0.94 0.93<br />

Table 4-1 Speed vs. thickness values for Shipley 1811 photoresist.<br />

baked again. This stage of the process is known as the soft-bake and it occurs<br />

for thirty minutes at 90° C.<br />

4.4 Exposure and Development<br />

A Karl Suss MJB3 mask aligner with a 325 nm UV light source was used<br />

to expose the mask onto the substrates. The mask aligner was used in a<br />

constant intensity mode at 15 mW/cm 2 . The exposure time setting varied as a<br />

function of photoresist thickness. The thicker the photoresist layer, the longer<br />

the exposure time necessary to expose the mask pattern all the way through the<br />

photoresist to the glass substrate. To determine the necessary exposure time, a<br />

mask with linear gratings was exposed to a number of substrates, each for a<br />

different exposure time. The substrates were then examined using the stylus<br />

profiler to determine the proper exposure time. The proper exposure time was<br />

determined by examining the square well pattern formed in the photoresist by<br />

the mask exposure. If the height of the square well features in the photoresist<br />

was not equal to the known height of the photoresist, the exposure time used<br />

was insufficient. Figure 4-2 is an example of the output from the stylus profiler<br />

used to determine the appropriate exposure times. Using this experimental

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!