05.03.2014 Views

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2002 VOL <strong>15</strong> NO. 2<br />

Part 1 – General Information<br />

Objections to Applications and<br />

Requests for Revocation of a<br />

Grant or of a Declaration that a<br />

Plant Variety is Essentially<br />

Derived from Another Plant<br />

Variety<br />

The Plant Breeder’s Rights scheme is administered<br />

consistent with the model law of the International<br />

Convention for the Protection of New Plant Varieties 1991<br />

(UPOV 91), that is, applicants are entitled to protection, in<br />

the absence of proof to the contrary.<br />

The Plant Breeder’s Rights Office (PBRO) is not<br />

required to prove the views, assertions, and opinions of<br />

persons challenging protection for plant varieties. Those<br />

objecting to/commenting on applications or<br />

requesting/commenting on revocation of a grant or<br />

declaration that a plant variety is essentially derived<br />

from another plant variety must provide conclusive<br />

supporting evidence why their objection/comment/<br />

request should be upheld. It cannot be stressed too<br />

strongly that conclusive argumentation should be<br />

provided from the outset.<br />

Objections to Applications<br />

A person may make objections to applications for PBR if (i)<br />

their commercial interests would be affected adversely, and<br />

(ii) the application will not fulfil all the conditions required<br />

by the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act.<br />

Objections to applications must be lodged with the<br />

Registrar no later than six months after the date the<br />

description of the variety is published in this journal. The<br />

objector must provide evidence of adverse affect on their<br />

commercial interests and that the application should not be<br />

granted.<br />

The Registrar of the Plant Breeder’s Rights Office (PBRO)<br />

is required to give a copy of the objection to the applicant.<br />

The objection is also available to the general public on<br />

request. The applicant has the opportunity to respond to the<br />

evidence presented. The Registrar then decides whether or<br />

not the objection will be upheld and, subsequently, whether<br />

the application will be granted. The PBRO is under no<br />

obligation to enter into further dialogue regarding an<br />

objection or to communicate reasons why an objection is<br />

not upheld. If an objection is upheld it will be notified in<br />

this journal.<br />

A payment of $100 is required on lodgement of the<br />

objection. Additional costs of $75 per hour for work<br />

undertaken in relation to the objection will be billed to the<br />

objector.<br />

Comments on Applications<br />

The PBRO accepts comments on applications. However, the<br />

scheme is managed on normal risk management lines and<br />

with an emphasis on the requirement that challengers with<br />

a commercial interest must demonstrate conclusively that<br />

an application should not be granted.<br />

All written comment will be acknowledged. The PBRO is<br />

under no obligation to enter into further communication<br />

regarding comments. If an application does not proceed to<br />

a grant it will be notified in this journal.<br />

Requests for Revocation, (where<br />

an individual’s interests are<br />

affected) of:<br />

• Grant<br />

• Declaration that a Plant<br />

Variety is Essentially Derived<br />

A person may, when their interests are affected adversely,<br />

apply for the revocation of:<br />

• a grant of PBR; or<br />

• a declaration that a plant variety is essentially derived<br />

from another plant variety.<br />

The person requesting revocation is required to lodge a<br />

revocation payment fee of $500. The person seeking<br />

revocation of a grant or declaration that a plant variety is<br />

essentially derived from another plant, must provide<br />

conclusive evidence of adverse affect on their interests and<br />

that the grant should be revoked.<br />

The PBRO also accepts information regarding revocation of<br />

grants and declarations of essentially derived plant varieties.<br />

Such information must demonstrate conclusively that a<br />

grant or declaration should not have been made. All written<br />

information will be acknowledged. The PBRO is under no<br />

obligation to enter into further communication regarding<br />

information provided.<br />

On-line Database for PBR<br />

Varieties<br />

The PBR Office has an exciting development in customer<br />

service for Internet users ~ a searchable database for all<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n PBR varieties, both past and present. The<br />

database features a detailed description and image for every<br />

variety granted full rights and basic information for other<br />

PBR varieties. Searches by genus, species, common name,<br />

variety name and titleholder are some of its many<br />

advantages. Please browse the database at<br />

www.affa.gov.au/pbr and provide your feedback.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!