05.03.2014 Views

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DESCR<strong>IP</strong>TIONS<br />

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2002 VOL <strong>15</strong> NO. 2<br />

Saccharum hybrid<br />

Sugarcane<br />

‘Q196’<br />

Application No: 2002/025 Accepted: 4 Mar 2002.<br />

Applicant: Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations,<br />

Indooroopilly, QLD.<br />

Characteristics (Table 36, Figure 43) Ploidy: cytologically<br />

complex polyploid and aneuploid interspecific hybrid.<br />

Plant: stool growth habit erect, tillering medium, number of<br />

suckers very few to few, leaf canopy medium. Stem: culm<br />

height (base to TVD leaf) tall with mean length<br />

approximately 2.36m (range 1.72 to 3.24m). Internode:<br />

length on bud side very long with mean length<br />

approximately 17.5cm (range 13.4 to 22.8cm), length on<br />

opposite to bud side very long with mean length<br />

approximately 17.1cm (range 13.0 to 22.4cm), diameter of<br />

longest internode central and perpendicular to bud medium<br />

to thick with mean approximately 25.2mm (range 19.8 to<br />

32.7mm), diameter of longest internode central and<br />

dissecting bud medium to thick with mean approximately<br />

25.5mm (range 19.9 to 32.2mm), shape cylindrical to<br />

tumescent, cross-section slightly oval, colour of dewaxed<br />

internode exposed to sun brown RHS 200D to greyedbrown<br />

RHS 199A, unexposed colour yellow-green RHS<br />

<strong>15</strong>3D, waxiness light, wax band moderate to distinct and<br />

width medium, expression of zigzag alignment weak,<br />

growth cracks few to medium, cork cracks medium. Bud<br />

groove: prominence medium, length short to medium, depth<br />

shallow to medium. Node: width of root band on bud side<br />

medium (mean 10.3mm), bud prominence medium to<br />

strong, bud shape triangular pointed with position of base<br />

near to leaf scar, bud tip in relation to growth ring below to<br />

level, bud width excluding wings medium, bud wing width<br />

medium, leaf scar medium prominence and oblique<br />

descending towards bud, growth ring flush. Leaf: lamina<br />

length of TVD leaf medium to long with mean<br />

approximately 1.53m (range 1.23 to 1.79m), width wide<br />

with mean approximately 48.1mm (range 40.7 to 53.7mm)<br />

at longitudinal midpoint and curved near tip in attitude,<br />

midrib width of lamina at longitudinal midpoint medium<br />

with mean 3.9mm (range 3.1 to 5.6mm), ratio of lamina<br />

width/midrib width medium with mean approximately 12.5<br />

(range 9.5 to <strong>15</strong>.4). Leaf sheath: length of leaf sheath of<br />

TVD leaf medium with mean approximately 34.9cm (range<br />

28.5 to 40.5cm), adherence of sheaths of senescent leaves to<br />

culm medium, density of hairs on abaxial leaf sheath<br />

surface (Group 57) medium and length medium. Ligule:<br />

shape crescentiform, width at midrib section medium,<br />

density of cilia along the free margin of ligule (Group 61)<br />

dense and length very short. Auricles: prominence medium,<br />

asymmetrical, shape of inner or underlapping auricle<br />

calcariform and size small to medium, shape of outer or<br />

overlapping auricle lanceolate and size small to medium.<br />

Inflorescence: open panicle. Flowering: discontinuous.<br />

Seed or fruit: caryopsis. Disease resistance: highly resistant<br />

to Fiji Disease Virus, intermediate to susceptible to Leaf<br />

Scald (Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson),<br />

intermediate to susceptible to Sugarcane Mosaic Virus,<br />

intermediate to Red Rot (Glomerella tucumanensis (Spego)<br />

Arx and Mueller), and highly resistant to Pachymetra Root<br />

Rot. Other characteristics: fibre quantity and quality are<br />

acceptable for milling purposes (impact reading 0.42, shear<br />

strength 24.8, short fibre 63.5%). In addition, ‘Q196’ was<br />

uniquely identified by DNA fingerprinting using<br />

microsatellite markers, and did not match any other current<br />

sugarcane DNA profile.<br />

Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent<br />

‘58N829’ x pollen parent ‘66N2008’ in a planned breeding<br />

program at Meringa (Gordonvale), QLD. ‘Q196’ is highly<br />

resistant to Fiji Disease Virus (score 2) and Pachymetra<br />

Root Rot (score 2), while ‘58N829’ is susceptible to Fiji<br />

Disease Virus (score 7) and ‘66N2008’ is very highly<br />

resistant to Fiji Disease Virus (score 1) and intermediate to<br />

susceptible to Pachymetra Root Rot (score 6). ‘Q196’ has<br />

been evaluated and selected by BSES in yield trials on the<br />

Central Sugar Experiment Station at Mackay and sites<br />

within the sugarcane growing area in the Central region.<br />

Standard commercial varieties were also included in the<br />

trials for comparative purposes. Selection criteria: cane<br />

yield, ccs, and sugar yield have been the main selection<br />

criteria. Disease resistance screening was conducted at the<br />

pathology farm (Eight Mile Plains) and in the Tully<br />

glasshouse. Propagation: after an initial seedling stage<br />

(using seed from the cross), all subsequent stages have<br />

involved vegetative propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar<br />

Experiment Stations. QLD.<br />

Choice of Comparators ‘Q96’ and ‘Q124’ were chosen, as<br />

they are the most similar varieties grown in the Central<br />

region. ‘Q96’ accounted for about 0.7% (57,000 t), while<br />

‘Q124’ accounted for 65.6% (5.0 million t) of the Central<br />

region crop in 2001. Neither parent was included as a<br />

comparator as both have been discarded from the parent<br />

collection. However, the parents could be distinguished<br />

from the candidate variety by their individual disease<br />

resistance scores as mentioned above.<br />

Comparative Trial Location: conducted at Central Sugar<br />

Experiment Station (21º 9′ South, 149º 7′ East), Te Kowai,<br />

QLD. The trial was planted 20 Sep 2000, harvested on 5 Oct<br />

2001 and ratooned. DUS data were recorded end of May<br />

2001. Conditions: clones were propagated from vegetative<br />

cuttings and grown under field conditions. Soil type:<br />

Pioneer. Watering regime: Flood irrigated once 18/10/00.<br />

Chemicals: Lorsban (1L/ha) and SuSCon 29kg/ha were<br />

applied at planting and Gramoxone (1L/ha) and Diurex<br />

(2kg/ha) were used to control weeds in 2001. Fertilisers:<br />

DAP (196kg/ha – N 36kg/ha, P 40kg/ha) was applied at<br />

planting; 50/50 (400kg/ha – N 100kg/ha, K 100kg/ha) was<br />

applied in Nov 2000; Trial design: clones were grown in a<br />

randomised complete block design with three replicates.<br />

Plots were single row by 9m, with 1.5m between rows.<br />

Measurements: taken from up to 20 stalks sampled<br />

randomly per plot.<br />

Prior Applications and Sales<br />

No prior application. First sold in <strong>Australia</strong> in May 2001.<br />

Description: Dr George Piperidis, BSES, Indooroopilly, QLD.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!