05.03.2014 Views

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

44. Volume 15- Number 2 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2002 VOL <strong>15</strong> NO. 2<br />

to fused to leaf scar, bud tip in relation to growth ring level,<br />

bud width excluding wings medium, bud wing width very<br />

narrow, leaf scar medium prominence and oblique<br />

descending towards bud, growth ring flush. Leaf: lamina<br />

length of TVD leaf short with mean approximately 1.37m<br />

(range 1.18 to 1.55m), width narrow with mean<br />

approximately 38.4mm (range 31.3 to <strong>44.</strong>6mm) at<br />

longitudinal midpoint and bent near tip in attitude, midrib<br />

width of lamina at longitudinal midpoint narrow with mean<br />

3.7mm (range 2.8 to 4.4mm), ratio of lamina width/midrib<br />

width low with mean approximately 10.5 (range 8.2 to<br />

<strong>15</strong>.0). Leaf sheath: length of leaf sheath of TVD leaf very<br />

short with mean approximately 24.9cm (range 22.5 to<br />

28.0cm), adherence of sheaths of senescent leaves to culm<br />

weak, density of hairs on abaxial leaf sheath surface (Group<br />

57) medium and length medium to long. Ligule: shape<br />

crescentiform, width at midrib section medium, density of<br />

cilia along the free margin of ligule (Group 61) sparse and<br />

length medium. Auricles: prominence inconspicuous,<br />

asymmetrical, shape of inner or underlapping auricle<br />

deltoid and size very small, shape of outer or overlapping<br />

auricle transitional. Inflorescence: open panicle. Flowering:<br />

discontinuous. Seed or fruit: caryopsis. Disease resistance:<br />

highly resistant to Leaf Scald (Xanthomonas albilineans<br />

(Ashby) Dowson), and intermediate to Pachymetra Root<br />

Rot. Other characteristics: fibre quantity and quality are<br />

acceptable for milling purposes (impact reading 0.43, shear<br />

strength 27.8, short fibre 65.4%). In addition, ‘Q200’ was<br />

uniquely identified by DNA fingerprinting using<br />

microsatellite markers, and did not match any other current<br />

sugarcane DNA profile.<br />

Origin and Breeding Controlled pollination: seed parent<br />

‘63N1700’ x pollen parent ‘66N2008’ in a planned breeding<br />

program at Meringa (Gordonvale), QLD. ‘Q200’ is highly<br />

resistant to Leaf Scald (score 2) and intermediate to<br />

Pachymetra Root Rot (score 5) while ‘63N1700’ is very<br />

highly resistant to Leaf Scald (score 1), susceptible to<br />

highly susceptible Pachymetra Root Rot (score 7.5), and<br />

‘66N2008’ is highly resistant to Leaf Scald (score 2) and<br />

intermediate to susceptible to Pachymetra Root Rot (score<br />

6). ‘Q200’ has been evaluated and selected by BSES in<br />

yield trials on the Meringa Sugar Experiment Station at<br />

Gordonvale and sites within the sugarcane growing area of<br />

the Northern region. Standard commercial varieties were<br />

also included in the trials for comparative purposes.<br />

Selection criteria: cane yield, ccs, and sugar yield have been<br />

the main selection criteria. Disease resistance screening was<br />

conducted at the pathology farm (Eight Mile Plains) and in<br />

the Tully glasshouse. Propagation: after an initial seedling<br />

stage (using seed from the cross), all subsequent stages have<br />

involved vegetative propagation. Breeder: Bureau of Sugar<br />

Experiment Stations. QLD.<br />

Choice of Comparators ‘Q127’ and ‘Q167’ A were chosen,<br />

as they are the most similar varieties of common knowledge<br />

grown in the Northern region. Together, these varieties<br />

accounted for about 1.2 % (85,300 t) of the Northern region<br />

crop in 2001. Neither parent was included as a comparator<br />

as both have been discarded from the parent collection.<br />

However, the parents could be distinguished from the<br />

candidate variety by their individual disease resistance<br />

scores as mentioned above.<br />

Comparative Trial Location: conducted at Meringa Sugar<br />

Experiment Station (17º 12′ South, 145º 45′ East),<br />

Gordonvale, QLD. The trial was planted 27 Jul 2000 and<br />

harvested in Aug 2001. DUS data were recorded in mid<br />

May 2001. Conditions: clones were propagated from<br />

vegetative cuttings and grown under field conditions. Soil<br />

type: Clifton. Watering regime: Rainfed. Chemicals:<br />

fungicide Shirtan was applied at 400 ml per hectare at<br />

planting. Stomp (4L/ha) and Atradex (2.25kg/ha) were<br />

applied one week after planting to control weeds. Diurex<br />

(4kg/ha) also was applied on 20 Nov 2000 for additional<br />

weed control. Fertilisers: DAP (120kg/ha) was applied at<br />

planting. Zinc sulphate heptahydrate (44kg/ha) was applied<br />

on 18 Nov 2000 and CK 50/50 (353kg/ha) was applied on<br />

31 Nov 2000. Total nutrients were: N – 106kg/ha; P –<br />

24kg/ha; K – 85kg/ha; Zn – 10kg/ha; S – 5kg/ha. Trial<br />

design: clones were grown in a randomised complete block<br />

design with three replicates. Plots were single row by 10m,<br />

with 1.5m between rows. Measurements: taken from up to<br />

<strong>15</strong> stalks sampled randomly per plot.<br />

Prior Applications and Sales<br />

No prior applications. First sold in <strong>Australia</strong> in May 2001.<br />

Description: Dr George Piperidis, BSES, Indooroopilly, QLD.<br />

Table 40 Saccharum varieties<br />

‘Q200’ *‘Q127’ *‘Q167’ A<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

TILLERING<br />

medium many very many<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

LEAF CANOPY<br />

medium light to medium<br />

medium<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

SUCKERING<br />

very few very few very few<br />

to few<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

ALIGNMENT OF INTERNODES<br />

weakly medium weakly to<br />

zigzagged zigzagged medium<br />

zigzagged<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Perpendicular to Bud (mm)<br />

LSD (P≤0.01) = 2.6<br />

mean 22.5 a 27.5 b 25.5 b<br />

std deviation 2.7 4.0 2.5<br />

very thin medium thin<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

INTERNODE WIDTH – Central Dissecting Bud (mm) LSD<br />

(P≤0.01) = 2.7<br />

mean 23.4 a 27.4 b 26.1 ab<br />

std deviation 3.1 4.2 2.8<br />

very thin thin to thin<br />

medium<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

INTERNODE SHAPE<br />

conoidal<br />

cylindrical to conoidal<br />

concaveconvex<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!