08.04.2014 Views

2013 Briefing Book - Print Version - Aipac

2013 Briefing Book - Print Version - Aipac

2013 Briefing Book - Print Version - Aipac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ISRAEL AT RISK<br />

repeatedly held “Emergency Special Sessions” that focus solely on the Arab conflict with Israel.<br />

Although these types of sessions were originally conceived in 1950 for emergencies like the Korean<br />

War, they have since then focused primarily on condemning Israel, while numerous other world<br />

emergencies, such as the genocide in Darfur and the Syrian regime’s killing of its own people, go<br />

virtually ignored.<br />

Likewise, three unique U.N. entities are dedicated to promoting the Palestinian cause<br />

and, consequently, to repeatedly condemning Israel. They include the Special Committee<br />

to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and<br />

Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable<br />

Rights of the Palestinian People and the Division for Palestinian Rights within the U.N.<br />

Secretariat. Together, these three agencies spend millions of dollars each year to spread anti-<br />

Israel propaganda and engage in some of the worst anti-Israel activity. The United States has<br />

consistently condemned this behavior.<br />

SINGLING OUT ISRAEL ON HUMAN RIGHTS<br />

Created in March 2006 to replace the former U.N. Commission on Human Rights, the new<br />

U.N. Human Rights Council maintains an endemic hostility to Israel, combined with hands-off<br />

treatment of some of the world’s most notorious human rights abusers.<br />

The new Council’s first session culminated with only one country-specific decision—a call for reports<br />

and consideration of “Israeli human rights violations” in Palestinian and “other occupied Arab<br />

territories.” Less than one week later, the Council convened an emergency session devoted to “Israeli<br />

military operations against Palestinian civilians.” As the Israel Defense Forces sought to rescue<br />

Corporal Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier kidnapped by Hamas days earlier (on June 25, 2006) and<br />

eventually released as part of a prisoner exchange between the terrorist group and Israel in October<br />

2011, the Council passed a resolution condemning Israeli actions and dispatched an “urgent factfinding<br />

mission” to the region to report on Israeli human rights abuses. The resolution ignored<br />

Hamas’ kidnapping and the daily barrage of Qassam rockets striking Israeli cities.<br />

QUESTIONING ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE<br />

This process of condemnation and delegitimization was renewed in the wake of fighting between<br />

Hamas and Israel in 2008. Israel had launched defensive operations in Gaza after enduring<br />

thousands of rocket attacks against its civilians. An ill-conceived and biased fact-finding commission,<br />

appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council, released a report—known as the Goldstone Report<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!