28.04.2014 Views

Lecture Notes for 120 - UCLA Department of Mathematics

Lecture Notes for 120 - UCLA Department of Mathematics

Lecture Notes for 120 - UCLA Department of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3<br />

Space Curves<br />

3.1. The Fundamental Equations<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> space curves dates back to Clairaut in 1731. He considered<br />

them as the intersection <strong>of</strong> two surfaces given by equations. In that work Clairaut<br />

showed that space curves have two curvatures, but they did not corresponds exactly<br />

to the curvature and torsion we introduce below. The subject was later taken<br />

up by Euler who was the first to think <strong>of</strong> curves as parametrized by arclength.<br />

Lancret in 1806 introduced the concepts <strong>of</strong> unit tangent, principal normal and binormal<br />

and with those curvature and torsion as we now understand them. It is,<br />

however, possible that Monge had some inklings <strong>of</strong> what torsion was, but he never<br />

presented an explicit <strong>for</strong>mula. Cauchy in 1826 considerably modernized the subject<br />

and <strong>for</strong>mulated some <strong>of</strong> the relations that later became part <strong>of</strong> the Serret and Frenet<br />

equations that we shall introduce below.<br />

In order to create a set <strong>of</strong> equations <strong>for</strong> space curves q (t) :[a, b] ! R 3 we<br />

need to not only assume that the curve is regular but also that its velocity and<br />

acceleration are always linearly independent. This is equivalent to assuming that<br />

q is regular and that the unit tangent T also defines a regular curve, i.e., that the<br />

curvature never vanishes. In this case it is possible to define a suitable positively<br />

oriented orthonormal frame T, N, andB by declaring<br />

T = v<br />

|v|<br />

a (a · T) T<br />

N =<br />

|a (a · T) T|<br />

B = T ⇥ N<br />

The new normal vector B is called the bi-normal. We define the curvature and<br />

torsion by<br />

apple = N · dT<br />

ds<br />

⌧ = B · dN<br />

ds<br />

We should check that these definitions <strong>for</strong> N and apple are consistent with our<br />

earlier definitions where we used ✓ as arclength parameter <strong>for</strong> T. We already saw<br />

that the earlier definitions implied the <strong>for</strong>mulas we just gave. So it is a question <strong>of</strong><br />

checking that our new definitions conversely imply the old ones. We’ll do this after<br />

having established the next theorem using only the definitions just given.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!