Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
appeal, a copy <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>and</strong> field notes <strong>of</strong> the survey or <strong>of</strong> the survey as amended in<br />
accordance with the order <strong>of</strong> the court, as the case may be, shall be registered by the Minister<br />
with the proper l<strong>and</strong> registrar <strong>and</strong> a copy there<strong>of</strong> shall be filed with the clerk <strong>of</strong> the municipality<br />
that made the application under subsection 48 (1).”<br />
Based on these sections from the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act, my instructions to undertake this survey are valid,<br />
provided that the proper procedure has been followed. These include:<br />
1. Properly constituted Municipal by-law requesting a survey. Presumably this could be<br />
challenged if a quorum was not present or any other defects exist could be used to negate<br />
the by-law;<br />
2. The line being surveyed must have previously been surveyed under competent authority,<br />
or have been surveyed under either the Registry Act or the L<strong>and</strong> Titles Act. In this case,<br />
being an original Road Allowance, the line was surveyed under instructions from the<br />
<strong>Survey</strong>or General for Upper Canada in 1821;<br />
3. The Minister shall appoint <strong>and</strong> instruct a surveyor to undertake a survey. This has been<br />
done by the <strong>Survey</strong>or General, who has been assigned this duty by the Minister. In this<br />
case my instructions were to survey the Road Allowances in accordance with the<br />
appropriate method prescribed by the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act.<br />
6.1.2 Road Allowances in Double Front Townships<br />
We find the following background <strong>and</strong> instructions in Section 24 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act (RSO 1990):<br />
1) “In this Part, “double front township” means a township where the usual practice in the<br />
original survey was to survey the township boundaries, the pro<strong>of</strong> lines <strong>and</strong> base lines, if any, <strong>and</strong><br />
the concession lines forming the front boundaries <strong>of</strong> the half lots <strong>and</strong> to establish the front<br />
corners <strong>of</strong> the half lots.”<br />
2) “A surveyor in re-establishing a lost corner or obliterated boundary in a double front<br />
township shall obtain the best evidence available respecting the corner or boundary, but if the<br />
corner or boundary cannot be re-established in its original position from such evidence, he shall<br />
proceed as follows:<br />
5) “If the concession line forming the front boundary <strong>of</strong> the half lots in a concession is<br />
obliterated beyond the last ascertainable point in a concession broken by a lake or river<br />
at its end, he shall re-establish such concession line on the same astronomic course as<br />
shown on the original plan <strong>and</strong> field notes from the last ascertainable point on the<br />
concession line.”<br />
The method for re-surveying an obliterated concession line is illustrated as #49.<br />
Instructions for dealing with side lines under this township system are found in Section 28, <strong>and</strong><br />
specifically subsection 1:<br />
28. “A surveyor in establishing in a concession in a double front township a side line <strong>of</strong> a half<br />
lot that was not surveyed in the original survey shall proceed as follows:<br />
Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 66