28.04.2014 Views

Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...

Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...

Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appeal, a copy <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>and</strong> field notes <strong>of</strong> the survey or <strong>of</strong> the survey as amended in<br />

accordance with the order <strong>of</strong> the court, as the case may be, shall be registered by the Minister<br />

with the proper l<strong>and</strong> registrar <strong>and</strong> a copy there<strong>of</strong> shall be filed with the clerk <strong>of</strong> the municipality<br />

that made the application under subsection 48 (1).”<br />

Based on these sections from the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act, my instructions to undertake this survey are valid,<br />

provided that the proper procedure has been followed. These include:<br />

1. Properly constituted Municipal by-law requesting a survey. Presumably this could be<br />

challenged if a quorum was not present or any other defects exist could be used to negate<br />

the by-law;<br />

2. The line being surveyed must have previously been surveyed under competent authority,<br />

or have been surveyed under either the Registry Act or the L<strong>and</strong> Titles Act. In this case,<br />

being an original Road Allowance, the line was surveyed under instructions from the<br />

<strong>Survey</strong>or General for Upper Canada in 1821;<br />

3. The Minister shall appoint <strong>and</strong> instruct a surveyor to undertake a survey. This has been<br />

done by the <strong>Survey</strong>or General, who has been assigned this duty by the Minister. In this<br />

case my instructions were to survey the Road Allowances in accordance with the<br />

appropriate method prescribed by the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act.<br />

6.1.2 Road Allowances in Double Front Townships<br />

We find the following background <strong>and</strong> instructions in Section 24 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Survey</strong>s Act (RSO 1990):<br />

1) “In this Part, “double front township” means a township where the usual practice in the<br />

original survey was to survey the township boundaries, the pro<strong>of</strong> lines <strong>and</strong> base lines, if any, <strong>and</strong><br />

the concession lines forming the front boundaries <strong>of</strong> the half lots <strong>and</strong> to establish the front<br />

corners <strong>of</strong> the half lots.”<br />

2) “A surveyor in re-establishing a lost corner or obliterated boundary in a double front<br />

township shall obtain the best evidence available respecting the corner or boundary, but if the<br />

corner or boundary cannot be re-established in its original position from such evidence, he shall<br />

proceed as follows:<br />

5) “If the concession line forming the front boundary <strong>of</strong> the half lots in a concession is<br />

obliterated beyond the last ascertainable point in a concession broken by a lake or river<br />

at its end, he shall re-establish such concession line on the same astronomic course as<br />

shown on the original plan <strong>and</strong> field notes from the last ascertainable point on the<br />

concession line.”<br />

The method for re-surveying an obliterated concession line is illustrated as #49.<br />

Instructions for dealing with side lines under this township system are found in Section 28, <strong>and</strong><br />

specifically subsection 1:<br />

28. “A surveyor in establishing in a concession in a double front township a side line <strong>of</strong> a half<br />

lot that was not surveyed in the original survey shall proceed as follows:<br />

Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!