Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Report of Research, Field Investigation and Survey of Robert D ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.5.2 Draft Memor<strong>and</strong>um to Council <strong>of</strong> Corporation <strong>of</strong> Tiny Township by David W. Lambden<br />
O.L.S. dated June 6, 2002<br />
This document is a preliminary report on investigations into the One Chain Road Allowances<br />
created by the several Patents to John Goesmann in payment for his survey <strong>of</strong> the township.<br />
O.L.S. Lambden goes to extreme detail in his investigation, most <strong>of</strong> which is not relevant to the<br />
present situation, but at Section A, he reports on several aspects related to the original survey <strong>of</strong><br />
Tiny Township. Of specific note are his comments at A.4 where he confirms my finding that<br />
Goesmann did not survey any pro<strong>of</strong> lines, <strong>and</strong> only surveyed the concession lines.<br />
This is a copyrighted document which O.L.S. Lambden provided to me on condition that I not<br />
release copies without his approval. As such, copies are not included.<br />
6.5.3 <strong>Field</strong> Book 38142 CLSR by T.A. Bunker, O.L.S. C.L.S., dated Mar. 5, 2010 (Tab 44)<br />
This document is entitled ‘<strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Water Levels in Georgian Bay,<br />
adjacent to Henvey Inlet Indian Reserve No. 2', prepared for <strong>Survey</strong>or General Branch <strong>of</strong><br />
Natural Resources Canada. It is <strong>of</strong> interest because, among other things, O.L.S. Bunker<br />
investigated the relationship between ‘IGLD1985 datum <strong>and</strong> CGVD28 datum. I wanted to<br />
prepare a cross-section <strong>of</strong> the centre-line <strong>of</strong> both Road Allowances being surveyed to show<br />
where the water’s edge would likely have been at different important dates, <strong>and</strong> having an<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the difference between these two datums is imperative if we are to get reliable<br />
results.<br />
Quoting O.L.S. Bunker from Pages 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 <strong>of</strong> his <strong>Report</strong>, “Measured elevations must be referred<br />
to a datum, a level surface from which the measurements are based. Elevations <strong>of</strong> the Great<br />
Lakes are referred to the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). Due to Glacial Isostatic<br />
Adjustment (GIA, <strong>of</strong>ten referred to a “post-glacial rebound”), the l<strong>and</strong> around the northern side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes is slowly rising, while the l<strong>and</strong> to the south <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes is slowly<br />
sinking. Because <strong>of</strong> this, the elevations <strong>of</strong> benchmarks located around the lakes are changing<br />
over time, <strong>and</strong> so the IGLD <strong>and</strong> benchmarks referred to it must be revised approximately avery<br />
25-35 years in order to ensure that the elevations assigned to the benchmarks remain fairly<br />
accurate.<br />
The first IGLD was named IGLD 1955, <strong>and</strong> has since been replaced with a newer version, IGLD<br />
1985. The date, 1985, is the central year <strong>of</strong> the period 1982-1988 during which water<br />
information was collected for preparing the datum revision.”<br />
Page 61 <strong>of</strong> 66