Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
April 24, 2007<br />
8. Increase in Hydroelectric Preference <strong>Power</strong> Rates – Notice <strong>of</strong> Adoption<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The President and Chief Executive Officer submitted <strong>the</strong> following report:<br />
“The Trustees are requested to approve an increase in <strong>the</strong> hydroelectric rates supplied from <strong>the</strong> Niagara and<br />
St. Lawrence/FDR Hydroelectric Projects (individually, ‘Niagara Project’ and ‘St. Lawrence Project,’ and<br />
collectively, <strong>the</strong> ‘Hydro Projects’) proposed at <strong>the</strong> January 30, 2007 meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trustees. Such rates apply to <strong>the</strong><br />
Authority’s sales <strong>of</strong> Preference <strong>Power</strong> to, among o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> municipal electric systems and rural electric cooperative<br />
customers, <strong>the</strong> neighboring state customers and <strong>the</strong> upstate utilities. The final rates are for <strong>the</strong> 2007 and 2008 rate<br />
years, which extend from May 1, 2007 to April 30, 2008 and from May 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009, respectively.<br />
This action accepts one significant adjustment to <strong>the</strong> final rates based on <strong>the</strong> customer comments on <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong><br />
Shared Services includable in rates. As a result, this modified proposal would increase rates for a typical preference<br />
power customer by 5.5% in <strong>the</strong> first rate year and by 5.9% in <strong>the</strong> second rate year. A detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cost<strong>of</strong>-Service<br />
(‘CoS’) issues is presented in <strong>the</strong> ‘Staff Analysis <strong>of</strong> Public Comments and Recommendations, Rate<br />
Modification Plan, April 2007’ (‘Staff Analysis’; see Appendix ‘8-A’).<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
“At <strong>the</strong>ir meeting <strong>of</strong> January 30, 2007, <strong>the</strong> Trustees authorized publication in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State Register<br />
<strong>of</strong> a Notice <strong>of</strong> Proposed Rulemaking to increase <strong>the</strong> hydroelectric preference power rates. The proposed rate plan<br />
was prepared by Authority staff and explained in its January 2007 report on ‘Hydroelectric Production Rates, Rate<br />
Modification Plan – 2007 and 2008 Rate Years’ (see Appendix ‘8-B’; referred to herein as ‘Rate Modification<br />
Plan’). The two-year rate plan was based on <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a preliminary 2007-08 CoS study. The January proposed<br />
rulemaking would have increased rates for <strong>the</strong> typical preference customers by 7.1% in <strong>the</strong> first rate year and 5.8%<br />
in <strong>the</strong> second.<br />
“The current rate plan, which ends April 30, 2007, is based on CoS principles approved by <strong>the</strong> Trustees at<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir meeting <strong>of</strong> April 29, 2003, all <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> municipal systems, rural electric cooperatives and neighboring state<br />
customers agreed to ei<strong>the</strong>r through settlements or in <strong>the</strong>ir contracts concerning <strong>the</strong>ir purchases <strong>of</strong> Preference <strong>Power</strong>.<br />
Those CoS principles are continued in this Rate Modification Plan.<br />
“The Rate Modification Plan details <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> production at <strong>the</strong> Hydro Projects. The major cost<br />
components are: (1) Capital Costs; (2) Operations and Maintenance; (3) Relicensing; (4) Indirect Overheads, and (5)<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r Postemployment Benefits. After summing <strong>the</strong> CoS components, a credit was calculated based on <strong>the</strong><br />
embedded costs <strong>of</strong> producing regulation service, operating reserves, voltage support and black-start service from <strong>the</strong><br />
Hydro Projects to meet contract customers’ needs for those four ancillary services. This credit is calculated in <strong>the</strong><br />
same manner as under <strong>the</strong> current rate plan approved in 2003.<br />
“The customers were provided with written notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rate Modification Plan and notice <strong>of</strong> a public<br />
forum on February 5, 2007. The Notice <strong>of</strong> Proposed Rulemaking was published in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State Register on<br />
February 14, 2007, and <strong>the</strong> public forum was held on March 22, 2007 for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> obtaining <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong><br />
interested parties.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
“After issuing <strong>the</strong> Rate Modification Plan, Authority staff responded to 159 data requests from <strong>the</strong><br />
following organizations: <strong>the</strong> Municipal Electric Utilities Association (‘MEUA’), <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Association <strong>of</strong><br />
Public <strong>Power</strong> (‘NYAPP’) and <strong>the</strong> Neighboring States Preference Customers (‘NS Customers’). Many requests were<br />
answered with work papers supporting <strong>the</strong> CoS calculations, but o<strong>the</strong>rs required detailed explanations.<br />
“On March 22, 2007, <strong>the</strong> public forum was held in Albany. The forum was conducted in accordance with<br />
<strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Policy and Procedures – Public Forum on Rate Proposals adopted by <strong>the</strong> Authority’s Trustees at<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir meeting <strong>of</strong> November 27, 1990. Authority staff spoke at <strong>the</strong> forum to explain <strong>the</strong> procedures and summarize<br />
<strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CoS and proposed rates. Nine representatives <strong>of</strong> various customers attended. Speakers included<br />
23