Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Power - New York Power ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
April 24, 2007<br />
11. Disposal via Sale <strong>of</strong> Beechcraft King Air B-350 Aircraft<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The President and Chief Executive Officer submitted <strong>the</strong> following report:<br />
“The Trustees are requested to delegate authority to <strong>the</strong> President and Chief Executive Officer to approve<br />
<strong>the</strong> disposal via sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Authority’s Beechcraft King Air B-350 aircraft, S/N FL-283, Registration Number<br />
N4083L (<strong>the</strong> ‘Plane’).<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
“In June 2000, <strong>the</strong> Authority purchased <strong>the</strong> Plane for use by <strong>the</strong> Authority primarily to transport employees<br />
to and from Authority facilities throughout <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State, for <strong>the</strong> purchase price <strong>of</strong> $5,582,350.<br />
“At <strong>the</strong>ir meeting <strong>of</strong> December 19, 2006, <strong>the</strong> Trustees delegated authority to <strong>the</strong> President and Chief<br />
Executive Officer to approve <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> a new King Air aircraft. The schedule for fabrication and delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> new plane is outlined in Exhibit ‘11-A.’ The contract with Hawker Beechcraft (formerly Ray<strong>the</strong>on Aircraft<br />
Company) for such purchase includes an option for <strong>the</strong> Authority to trade in <strong>the</strong> current King Air 350 for a trade-in<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> $2,650,000. However, based on <strong>the</strong> current fair market value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Plane (estimated between $2.6 and<br />
$3.2 million), staff recommended that competitive bids be sought in an attempt to maximize <strong>the</strong> Authority’s returnon-investment.<br />
“In addition, <strong>the</strong> Public Authorities Accountability Act <strong>of</strong> 2005 (‘PAAA’) and <strong>the</strong> Authority’s Guidelines<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Disposal <strong>of</strong> Personal Property (<strong>the</strong> ‘Guidelines’) require <strong>the</strong> Authority, with <strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trustees, to<br />
dispose <strong>of</strong> Authority property through solicitation <strong>of</strong> competitive proposals with public advertising for disposal <strong>of</strong><br />
personal property over $15,000 in value. To this end, staff prepared a Request for Proposals (‘RFP’; Q02-3998),<br />
which was posted on <strong>the</strong> Authority’s Procurement website. Notices <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RFP were included in<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State Contract Reporter and on various industry internet services.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
“As a result <strong>of</strong> this competitive solicitation, 31 potential bidders downloaded <strong>the</strong> RFP from <strong>the</strong> Authority’s<br />
Procurement website. Six proposals to purchase were received ranging in price from $2.5 to $2.7 million, as<br />
summarized in Exhibit ‘11-B.’ Authority staff is currently in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong>se proposals from <strong>the</strong><br />
standpoint <strong>of</strong> pricing, overall background, qualifications and financial condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bidders. Due to <strong>the</strong> need to<br />
finalize <strong>the</strong> transaction as soon as possible in order to lock in <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Plane on <strong>the</strong> most advantageous terms to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Authority, an award to <strong>the</strong> successful bidder is expected in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> May 2007. In order to support this<br />
schedule, staff recommends that <strong>the</strong> Trustees authorize <strong>the</strong> President and Chief Executive Officer to approve <strong>the</strong> sale<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Plane to <strong>the</strong> bidder that provides <strong>the</strong> most advantageous value to <strong>the</strong> Authority. A separate report will be sent<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Trustees documenting this decision.<br />
“Three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposal prices received are higher than <strong>the</strong> aforementioned trade-in allowance pr<strong>of</strong>fered by<br />
Ray<strong>the</strong>on, and staff expects to recommend an award to <strong>the</strong> successful bidder at an amount greater than such<br />
allowance. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> Authority will not be exercising <strong>the</strong> option in <strong>the</strong> Ray<strong>the</strong>on purchase contract.<br />
FISCAL INFORMATION<br />
“The disposal will be conditioned on <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> an agreement between <strong>the</strong> successful bidder and <strong>the</strong><br />
Authority, with a 10% deposit required on execution.<br />
“Prior to <strong>the</strong> closing, <strong>the</strong> buyer will be allowed to conduct a detailed inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aircraft and, if any<br />
reasonable deficiencies are noted, <strong>the</strong> Authority and <strong>the</strong> buyer will negotiate an adjustment to <strong>the</strong> purchase price,<br />
reflecting <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> such corrections. The agreement will provide that once <strong>the</strong> inspection and negotiation is<br />
completed, <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aircraft will be ‘as is,’ with no warranty <strong>of</strong> any kind from <strong>the</strong> Authority, along with such<br />
additional protections that reasonably safeguard <strong>the</strong> Authority from future responsibility.<br />
34