08.05.2014 Views

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(F) The concept of fiduciary responsibility.<br />

Reading: Hudson, section 2.3.3; <strong>and</strong> the essay <strong>com</strong>prising<br />

chapter 14.<br />

A trustee is an example of a fiduciary (along with, inter alia, <strong>com</strong>pany directors, agents, <strong>and</strong><br />

partners “acting in <strong>com</strong>mon with a view to profit”). So, it is important to underst<strong>and</strong> what the<br />

concept of fiduciary responsibility entails.<br />

‘A fiduciary is someone who has undertaken to act for or on behalf of another in a<br />

particular matter in circumstances which give rise to a relationship of trust <strong>and</strong><br />

confidence. The distinguishing obligation of a fiduciary is the obligation of loyalty.<br />

The principal is entitled to the single-minded loyalty of his fiduciary. The core liability<br />

has several facets. A fiduciary must act in good faith; he must not make a profit out<br />

of his trust; he must not place himself in a position where his duty <strong>and</strong> his interest<br />

may conflict; he may not act for his own benefit or the benefit of a third person<br />

without the informed consent of his principal. This is not intended to be an<br />

exhaustive list, but it is sufficient to indicate the nature of fiduciary obligations. They<br />

are the defining characteristics of the fiduciary.’<br />

- Bristol <strong>and</strong> West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 at 18, per Millett LJ<br />

"A person will be a fiduciary in his relationship with another when <strong>and</strong> in so far as<br />

that other is entitled to expect that he will act in that other's interests or (as in a<br />

partnership) in their joint interests, to the exclusion of his own several interest."<br />

Paul Finn, "Fiduciary Law <strong>and</strong> the Modern Commercial World",<br />

in Commercial Aspects of <strong>Trusts</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fiduciary Relationships<br />

(ed. McKendrick, 1992), p. 9.<br />

See also: Finn, Fiduciary Obligations (1977);<br />

Finn, "The Fiduciary Principle", in <strong>Equity</strong>, Fiduciaries <strong>and</strong> <strong>Trusts</strong> (ed. Youdan, 1989);<br />

A.J. Oakley, Constructive <strong>Trusts</strong> (1997), Ch. 3;<br />

A.J. Oakley (ed.), Trends in Contemporary Trust Law (1996) generally.<br />

(G) The benefits of trusts<br />

Reading: Hudson, section 2.5<br />

A framework for underst<strong>and</strong>ing change in the law of trusts: three conceptions of the<br />

trust - moralistic, individual property, capital management: see Cotterrell, "Trusting<br />

in Law" (1993) 46 CLP 75, 86-90.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Proprietary right in the trust property for beneficiaries, not simply a personal claim<br />

against the trustees.<br />

Provides preferential rights in an insolvency. Important in giving priority for<br />

beneficiaries in the event of the trustee’s bankruptcy.<br />

A range of equitable remedies enforceable against the trustees <strong>and</strong> any third parties<br />

by the beneficiaries in the event of loss.<br />

Flexibility – useful in <strong>com</strong>mercial <strong>and</strong> domestic situations, as considered below.<br />

Usefulness in tax planning <strong>and</strong> estate planning generally.<br />

A trust is a “gift over the plane of time” giving the settlor flexibility <strong>and</strong> control.<br />

<strong>Trusts</strong> constitute the most significant players in UK securities markets in the form of<br />

pension funds <strong>and</strong> investment funds (like unit trusts).<br />

(H) Fundamental principles of trusts: the obligations of trustees <strong>and</strong> the rights of<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Reading: Hudson, section 2.4<br />

**Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v. Islington [1996] 2 All E.R. 961, 988. [1996] AC 669<br />

*Saunders v Vautier (1841) – the rights of the beneficiary<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!