Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Re Nelson [1928] Ch 920 “the principle in Saunders v Vautier is that where there is what<br />
amounts to an absolute gift, it cannot be fettered by prescribing a mode of enjoyment”<br />
3) The strict approach still in rude health<br />
Cf. Leahy v. Att.-Gen. for New South Wales [1959] A.C. 457<br />
**Re Grant’s WT [1979] 3 All ER 359 (“for the benefit of Chertsey CLP …” not a people<br />
trust).<br />
(D)<br />
Recognised exceptions to the beneficiary principle.<br />
Reading: Hudson, section 4.2<br />
1) Charitable trusts (public purpose trusts).<br />
<br />
<br />
Restricted to legal definition of charity (relief of poverty; promotion of<br />
education; advancement of religion; other miscellaneous purposes<br />
recognised in case law).<br />
benefit to a class of the public not defined by personal nexus (except in case<br />
of relief of poverty).<br />
N.B. Charitable trusts will be dealt with in detail, as a distinct topic, later in<br />
the course.<br />
2) "Concessions to human weakness or sentiment".<br />
A group of anomalous cases:-<br />
Pettingall v. Pettingall (1842) 11 L.J. Ch. 176 (maintenance of an identified pet animal –<br />
valid ).<br />
Re Dean (1889) 41 Ch. D. 552 (for the maintenance of testator’s horses <strong>and</strong> hounds for fifty<br />
years after his death – valid, time limited, North J can see no objection to use of own property for own<br />
purposes).<br />
Bourne v. Keane [1919] A.C. 426 (trust for the saying of masses in private may be valid if for a<br />
limited perpetuity period – Lord Buckmaster).<br />
Re Thompson [1934] Ch. 342 (promotion of fox hunting – valid ).<br />
Re Hooper [1932] 1 Ch. 38 (for the upkeep of graves <strong>and</strong> monuments for 21 years, held valid<br />
although not charitable).<br />
Cf. Re Endacott [1960] Ch. 232 (above - “a useful memorial to myself” was found to be void<br />
<strong>and</strong> the leading view re-instated).<br />
II.<br />
Unincorporated Associations<br />
(A)<br />
Conceptual issues with property held for unincorporated associations.<br />
Reading: Hudson, section 4.3<br />
1) Analytical problems associated with the application of the beneficiary principle <strong>and</strong> other<br />
requirements of certainty <strong>and</strong> validity for trusts<br />
Transfer to an association is a transfer not to a legal person <strong>and</strong> therefore someone must<br />
hold the property for the benefit of the association: that may render the transfer capable of<br />
being analysed as a void purpose trust.<br />
2) The various modes of interpretation<br />
a) Invalid purpose trusts<br />
26