Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e) Is change of position now equitable as opposed to restitutionary?<br />
Niru Battery Manufacturing Co <strong>and</strong> anor v Milestone Trading Ltd <strong>and</strong> ors [2003] EWCA<br />
Civ 1446<br />
2. Is change of position now to be understood in terms of estoppel by representation?<br />
Reading: Hudson, para 19.7.2<br />
(Jorden v Money (1854) V HLC 185, 10 ER 868)<br />
(Avon CC v Howlett [1983] 1 WLR 605)<br />
*National Westminster Bank plc v Somer International [2002] QB 1286, CA.<br />
Niru Battery Manufacturing Co <strong>and</strong> anor v Milestone Trading Ltd <strong>and</strong> ors [2003] EWCA<br />
Civ 1446<br />
3. Bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the defendant’s rights<br />
Reading: Hudson, para 19.7.4<br />
*Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v Islington [1996] AC 669<br />
Summary<br />
Following <strong>and</strong> tracing<br />
Foskett v McKeown<br />
Common law tracing<br />
FC Jones, etc. v Jones<br />
Equitable tracing<br />
Pre-requisite of equitable interest<br />
Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v Islington<br />
The process of equitable tracing<br />
Boscawen v Bajwa<br />
Mixture with trustee’s own property<br />
Re Hallett’s Estate<br />
Re Oatway<br />
Re Diplock<br />
Foskett v McKeown<br />
Equitable tracing into mixed accounts<br />
Clayton’s Case<br />
Re Ontario Securities<br />
Barlow Clowes v Vaughan<br />
Russell-Cooke v Prentis<br />
Loss of the right to trace<br />
Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v Islington<br />
Remedies after equitable tracing<br />
Charges<br />
Re Ontario Securities Commission<br />
Barlow Clowes International v. Vaughan<br />
Liens<br />
Constructive trusts<br />
Chase Manhattan v Israel-British Bank<br />
Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v Islington<br />
Subrogation<br />
Boscawen v. Bajwa<br />
‘Swollen assets’ charge<br />
Space Investments Ltd v. Canadian Bank<br />
Bishopsgate Investment v. Homan<br />
Serious Fraud Office v Lexi Holdings plc<br />
Re Lehman Brothers (Europe)(No2), Briggs J<br />
Defences<br />
Change of position<br />
Lipkin Gorman v. Karpnale<br />
Niru Battery Manufacturing v Milestone<br />
Trading Ltd<br />
Philip Collins Ltd v Davis<br />
Scottish Equitable plc v. Derby<br />
Dextra Bank <strong>and</strong> Trust Co v Bank of Jamaica<br />
Estoppel by representation<br />
NatWest v Somer<br />
<strong>Equity</strong>’s darling<br />
Westdeutsche L<strong>and</strong>esbank v Islington<br />
89