Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Topic 4. THE CONSTITUTION OF TRUSTS.<br />
Question: How is an express trust created?<br />
General reading: Hudson, Ch.5; Martin 123-154; Pettit<br />
100-126<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Transfer of property by settlor to trustee(s) to be held on trust for beneficiaries, or<br />
Declaration by settlor that property which settlor already holds or will receive is held by<br />
settlor on trust for beneficiaries, or<br />
Declaration by settlor to trustees that property which trustees hold on his/her behalf is<br />
henceforth to be held by them for beneficiaries.<br />
N. b. that, in each of the above cases, the settlor’s title to the property may be legal or<br />
equitable; <strong>and</strong> that property may be subjected to a trust either by will or through inter vivos<br />
(lifetime) transactions.<br />
(A)<br />
Statutory formalities applicable to the subjection of property to a trust by will:<br />
Wills Act 1837 s. 9.<br />
Reading: Hudson, section 5.1.1<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
will in writing<br />
testator’s signature (or equivalent) shows intention to give effect to will<br />
signature in presence of two or more co-present witnesses<br />
who attest will or acknowledge signature in testator’s presence<br />
(B)<br />
Two fundamental principles<br />
Reading: Hudson, section 5.1.2, <strong>and</strong> 5.2.4<br />
1) Once a trust is created, it cannot be undone<br />
Reading: Hudson, sections 5.1.2<br />
*Paul v. Paul (1882) 20 Ch. D. 742<br />
2) Settlor must have appropriate property rights at time of creating trust<br />
Reading: Hudson, sections 5.2.4<br />
Re Brooks ST [1939] 1 Ch 993<br />
Re Ralli’s WT [1964] 1 Ch 288<br />
(C) Exclusions from the need for formalities.<br />
General reading: Hudson, section 5.3<br />
a) Resulting, implied <strong>and</strong> constructive trusts require no formalities for their creation<br />
Reading: Hudson, sections 5.3.1<br />
LPA 1925, s. 53 (2)<br />
Hodgson v. Marks [1971] Ch. 892 (resulting trust, oddly).<br />
b) “Statute may not be used as an engine of fraud”: fraud <strong>and</strong> unconscionability<br />
Reading: Hudson, sections 5.3.2<br />
*Rochefoucauld v. Boustead [1897] 1 Ch. 196.<br />
Bannister v. Bannister [1948] 2 All E.R. 133<br />
Lyus v. Prowsa [1982] 1 W.L.R. 1044.<br />
31