08.05.2014 Views

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

Soton Equity and Trusts - alastairhudson.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Topic 4. THE CONSTITUTION OF TRUSTS.<br />

Question: How is an express trust created?<br />

General reading: Hudson, Ch.5; Martin 123-154; Pettit<br />

100-126<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Transfer of property by settlor to trustee(s) to be held on trust for beneficiaries, or<br />

Declaration by settlor that property which settlor already holds or will receive is held by<br />

settlor on trust for beneficiaries, or<br />

Declaration by settlor to trustees that property which trustees hold on his/her behalf is<br />

henceforth to be held by them for beneficiaries.<br />

N. b. that, in each of the above cases, the settlor’s title to the property may be legal or<br />

equitable; <strong>and</strong> that property may be subjected to a trust either by will or through inter vivos<br />

(lifetime) transactions.<br />

(A)<br />

Statutory formalities applicable to the subjection of property to a trust by will:<br />

Wills Act 1837 s. 9.<br />

Reading: Hudson, section 5.1.1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

will in writing<br />

testator’s signature (or equivalent) shows intention to give effect to will<br />

signature in presence of two or more co-present witnesses<br />

who attest will or acknowledge signature in testator’s presence<br />

(B)<br />

Two fundamental principles<br />

Reading: Hudson, section 5.1.2, <strong>and</strong> 5.2.4<br />

1) Once a trust is created, it cannot be undone<br />

Reading: Hudson, sections 5.1.2<br />

*Paul v. Paul (1882) 20 Ch. D. 742<br />

2) Settlor must have appropriate property rights at time of creating trust<br />

Reading: Hudson, sections 5.2.4<br />

Re Brooks ST [1939] 1 Ch 993<br />

Re Ralli’s WT [1964] 1 Ch 288<br />

(C) Exclusions from the need for formalities.<br />

General reading: Hudson, section 5.3<br />

a) Resulting, implied <strong>and</strong> constructive trusts require no formalities for their creation<br />

Reading: Hudson, sections 5.3.1<br />

LPA 1925, s. 53 (2)<br />

Hodgson v. Marks [1971] Ch. 892 (resulting trust, oddly).<br />

b) “Statute may not be used as an engine of fraud”: fraud <strong>and</strong> unconscionability<br />

Reading: Hudson, sections 5.3.2<br />

*Rochefoucauld v. Boustead [1897] 1 Ch. 196.<br />

Bannister v. Bannister [1948] 2 All E.R. 133<br />

Lyus v. Prowsa [1982] 1 W.L.R. 1044.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!