sr 77/oracle road multimodal corridor profile study final report - Pima ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SR <strong>77</strong>/ORACLE ROAD MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR PROFILE STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation Prepared by TransCore ITS, Inc. and Morrison-Maierle, Inc. In Association With Lima & Associates The Planning Center Harris Environmental Group, Inc. TranSystems Corporation MMLA Rillito Consulting Group May 2007
Page 1: & InAsociationwith: Lima&Asociates
Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page
Page 14 and 15: LIST OF EXHIBITS (Continued) Page E
Page 16 and 17: LIST OF EXHIBITS (Continued) Page E
Page 18 and 19: SR 77/Oracle Road Multimodal Corrid
Page 20 and 21: Exhibit 1-1 SR 77/ORACLE ROAD CORRI
Page 22 and 23: • Working Paper 3: Recommended Pr
Page 24 and 25: Exhibit 2-1 LIST OF STUDY DOCUMENTS
Page 26 and 27: • Phase II is an ongoing public i
Page 28 and 29: Transportation System Management St
Page 30 and 31: 2.1.10 Initial Project Assessment,
Page 32 and 33: 2.1.18 Miscellaneous ADOT Project A
Page 34 and 35: Road, east and west of SR 77 and on
Page 36 and 37: 2.4.2 Pinal County Transportation P
Page 38 and 39: alternative access to the Rancho Vi
Page 40 and 41: 2. Provide a median wide enough on
Page 42 and 43: development in the corridor and pro
Page 44 and 45: improvements will require modificat
Page 46 and 47: • There are several Transportatio
Page 48 and 49: • The land use of the Willow Spri
Page 50 and 51: North of the Pima County line into
Page 53 and 54:
3. SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT This c
Page 55 and 56:
adverse human health and environmen
Page 57 and 58:
La Cholla Blvd La Canada Dr Exhibit
Page 59 and 60:
La Cholla Blvd La Canada Dr Exhibit
Page 61:
Exhibit 3-9 DISTRIBUTION OF MINORIT
Page 64 and 65:
Exhibit 4-1 COMMON PLANTS ALONG THE
Page 66 and 67:
Exhibit 4-3 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SE
Page 68 and 69:
Arizona counties: Pima, Pinal, and
Page 70 and 71:
Exhibit 4-6 DRAINAGES AND RIPARIAN
Page 72 and 73:
Exhibit 4-6 DRAINAGES AND RIPARIAN
Page 74 and 75:
Exhibit 4-7 STREAMS AND WATER FEATU
Page 76 and 77:
Exhibit 4-8 USDA FOREST SERVICE SCE
Page 78 and 79:
seven percent of the standard. Acco
Page 80 and 81:
• Pima County Parks - Catalina Ne
Page 82 and 83:
Exhibit 4-10 NOISE ABATEMENT CRITER
Page 84 and 85:
Exhibit 5-1 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLAS
Page 86 and 87:
Exhibit 5-3 LOCATION OF CROSS SECTI
Page 88 and 89:
5.1.4 Pavement Type and Condition D
Page 90 and 91:
Exhibit 5-7 BRIDGE SUFFICIENCY RATI
Page 92 and 93:
Exhibit 5-9 WATERSHED MAP FOR SR 77
Page 94 and 95:
Exhibit 5-10 SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC
Page 96 and 97:
• At approximately Milepost 79.4,
Page 98 and 99:
to 2002, which translates into annu
Page 100 and 101:
Exhibit 5-14 SR 77 TRAFFIC VOLUME F
Page 102 and 103:
Exhibit 5-16 provides a summary of
Page 104 and 105:
distance of 3.8 miles. There is no
Page 106 and 107:
Exhibit 5-19 EXISTING TRANSIT FACIL
Page 108 and 109:
The express routes operate during p
Page 110 and 111:
Exhibit 5-21 SR 77 CORRIDOR AREA BI
Page 112 and 113:
Exhibit 5-23 SR 77 PEDESTRIAN FACIL
Page 114 and 115:
north of Tucson. The purposes of th
Page 116 and 117:
Exhibit 5-26 CORRIDOR NORTH/SOUTH R
Page 118 and 119:
Exhibit 5-27 CORRIDOR EAST/WEST ROA
Page 120 and 121:
Exhibit 5-28 CORRIDOR ALREADY PLANN
Page 122 and 123:
Exhibit 5-29 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED
Page 125 and 126:
6. EXISTING AND PROJECTED NEEDS AND
Page 127 and 128:
Exhibit 6-2 CORRIDOR CONGESTION DEF
Page 129 and 130:
MP 73.8 to MP 74.9 (Orange Grove Ro
Page 131 and 132:
Exhibit 6-5 FORT LOWELL/MIRACLE MIL
Page 133 and 134:
Exhibit 6-6 CORRIDOR SAFETY DEFICIE
Page 135 and 136:
6.1.4 Access The need for consolida
Page 137 and 138:
6.1.5 Public Comments on Safety and
Page 139 and 140:
Issue Level of Service Service Coor
Page 141 and 142:
Exhibit 6-12 PEDESTRIAN/BIKE ISSUES
Page 143 and 144:
arriers are geometrically deficient
Page 145 and 146:
Thornydale Rd La Canada Dr # Exhibi
Page 147 and 148:
Exhibit 6-17 DEFICIENCIES BY SEGMEN
Page 149 and 150:
From MP 80.2 79.7 Hanley Boulevard
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
7. INVESTMENT OPTIONS 7.1 SUMMARY O
Page 157 and 158:
Exhibit 7-1 POTENTIAL HIGH-CAPACITY
Page 159 and 160:
• Add right-turn lanes at all art
Page 161 and 162:
The results of the micro-simulation
Page 163 and 164:
median mid-block, rather than the A
Page 165 and 166:
available ROW. Parcels were elimina
Page 167 and 168:
Index Address Parcel ID Exhibit 7-6
Page 169 and 170:
7.2.2 Pedestrian Investment Options
Page 171 and 172:
Exhibit 7-8 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
Page 173 and 174:
side" bus pullouts, located downstr
Page 175 and 176:
Exhibit 7-10 CONSOLIDATION OF WORKS
Page 177 and 178:
In addition, ADOT and the local age
Page 179 and 180:
Exhibit 7-13 EXISTING AASHTO DESIGN
Page 181:
Retrofit Access Management Strategi
Page 184 and 185:
Exhibit 8-1 SR 77 ROW CONSTRAINTS T
Page 186 and 187:
Exhibit 8-3 COMPARISON OF SR 77 SEG
Page 188 and 189:
Exhibit 8-4 AGFD SPECIAL STATUS SPE
Page 190 and 191:
8.3.3 Cultural Resources Previously
Page 192 and 193:
Exhibit 8-6 AREAS WITH POSSIBLE TIT
Page 194 and 195:
HOLLA BL N LA CHOLLA BL N 1ST AV Ex
Page 197 and 198:
9. DEFICIENCY PRIORITIZATION AND PR
Page 199 and 200:
Exhibit 9-1 LIST OF PROPOSED PROJEC
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205:
Exhibit 9-3 COST COMPARISON OF WIDE
Page 208 and 209:
Exhibit 10-1 OVERVIEW OF SURVEY RES
Page 210 and 211:
Exhibit 10-2 OVERVIEW OF SURVEY RES
Page 212 and 213:
Exhibit 10-3 SURVEY RESPONSES FROM
Page 214 and 215:
Exhibit 10-4 ANALYSIS OF FIRST TRAN
Page 216 and 217:
Magee Road to Ina Road Segment of S
Page 218 and 219:
comments are provided in Exhibit 10
Page 220 and 221:
Exhibit 10-6 PUBLIC COMMENTS RECORD
Page 222 and 223:
Exhibit 10-8 COMMENTS FROM THE TOWN
Page 224 and 225:
Exhibit 10-9 COMMENTS PROVIDED ON B
Page 226 and 227:
Exhibit 10-10 PINAL COUNTY OPEN SPA
Page 229 and 230:
NRHP Properties within the Study Ar
Page 231:
APPENDIX B Previous Archaeological
Page 234 and 235:
Previous Archaeological Surveys wit
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
REFERENCES CITED IN APPENDIX B Adam
Page 246 and 247:
1991 Archaeological Survey for the
Page 248 and 249:
1994 Water Main Replacement at Mage
Page 250 and 251:
2001 A Cultural Resources Assessmen
Page 252 and 253:
1998 An Archaeological Survey of 6.
Page 254 and 255:
Levi, Laura 1992 Archaeological Sur
Page 256 and 257:
McKee, Brian R. and Allen Dart 2001
Page 258 and 259:
1991 A Class III Archaeological Sur
Page 260 and 261:
Sullivan, Alan P. 1981 Letter Repor
Page 262 and 263:
1983a Letter Report to Mr. Christop
Page 265:
APPENDIX C Map Showing Sensitivity
Page 271 and 272:
TOTAL CRASH CHARACTERISITCS (Decemb
Page 273 and 274:
WEEKDAY TOTAL VOLUMES ENTERING SIGN
Page 275 and 276:
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CRASH CHARA
Page 277 and 278:
WEEKDAY TOTAL VOLUMES BY ROADWAY SE
Page 279 and 280:
Beginning Mile Post ROADWAY SEGMENT
Page 281 and 282:
ACCESS RELATED CRASH ANALYSIS NORTH
Page 283 and 284:
160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 SR 77
Page 285 and 286:
Flowing Wells to I-10 Miracle Mile/
Page 287:
APPENDIX E Roadway Lighting Analysi
show all

sr 77/oracle road multimodal corridor profile study final report - Pima ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?