13.05.2014 Views

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

large mammals, by offering habitat contiguity of about<br />

3300 km 2 with three other protected areas in the region,<br />

namely Nagarahole and Bandipur National Parks and<br />

Wynaad Wildlife Sanctuary through forest corridors<br />

between the Western Ghats and Eastern Ghats forests.<br />

The habitat linkage is crucial for large ranging animals<br />

such as elephants, which use these forest corridors for<br />

migration. Livestock grazing, a major biotic interference<br />

in forest corridors, originates from seven settlements<br />

of the Masinagudi group of villages on the eastern and<br />

the southeastern fringes of the sanctuary. Construction<br />

of a series of hydroelectric power stations, numbering<br />

about three at Singara, Marvakandy (Masinagudi) and<br />

Moyar, around the Masinagudi villages caused a rapid<br />

growth in human population (143% between 1961 and<br />

1991), particularly the landless labourers and livestock.<br />

Free grazing by about 15 000-17 000 resident as well as<br />

migratory livestock every year in and around the forest<br />

corridors, coupled with removal of cattle dung from the<br />

forest floor, have adversely affected the forest regeneration<br />

and helped proliferation of weed species such as Lantana<br />

camara, Casia tora, C. occidentalis, Opuntia dillenii, and<br />

Ageratum conyzoides. The annual fodder production<br />

from the corridor forest could meet the demand of about<br />

two-thirds of the resident population, while the crop<br />

residues from the marginal agriculture could not support<br />

the remaining one-third livestock population. In view of<br />

such a situation, measures have been suggested to reduce<br />

livestock population and implement the ecodevelopment<br />

packages in order to ensure the corridor contiguity for the<br />

long-term conservation of the elephant population.<br />

Silveira, L., A. T.A. Jacomo and J. A. F. Diniz-Filho.<br />

2003. Camera trap, line transect census and track<br />

surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biological<br />

Conservation 114(3):351-355.<br />

Rapid faunal assessments can use different methods<br />

depending on environmental conditions and costs. To<br />

compare the efficiency of three methods in detecting<br />

species richness and abundance, we tested them in the<br />

grasslands of Emas National Park, central Brazil. Track<br />

census was the most effective method for detecting<br />

richness, followed by camera-trapping and direct faunal<br />

counts. Track census reached an asymptote for number<br />

of species after only 12 days, but all methods converged<br />

on similar estimates of species richness after around 30<br />

days. There was no significant spatial correlation for<br />

species richness or total abundance, between camera<br />

trap and tracks, across the 29 samples distributed in the<br />

park. However, for some species, abundance showed<br />

significant spatial correlation between methods. Also,<br />

these rates were significantly correlated across species<br />

and the spatial correlation between methods was<br />

significantly associated with log-transformed body<br />

mass across species. We conclude that, despite the high<br />

initial costs for camera-trapping, this method is the most<br />

appropriate for mammal inventory in all environmental<br />

conditions, allowing a rapid assessment of wildlife<br />

conservation status.<br />

Silver, S. C., L. E. T. Ostro and L. K. Marsh. 2002. The<br />

use of camera traps to estimate jaguar populations.<br />

Presentation at 2002 Society for Conservation Biology<br />

Annual Meeting, Canterbury, UK.<br />

A major obstacle to developing an effective, range-wide<br />

conservation strategy to protect jaguars (<strong>Panthera</strong> onca) is<br />

an absence of robust, reproducible population estimates.<br />

Occurring at low densities and being shy and secretive,<br />

jaguar populations have been historically very difficult<br />

to assess. Using a technique originally developed for<br />

tiger populations, we installed 20 camera trap stations<br />

sample an area of approximately 145 square kilometers<br />

of tropical forest in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife<br />

Sanctuary, Belize. Using the distinctive markings to<br />

identify individuals, we concluded that 11 jaguar were<br />

photographed over the 59 day sampling period. Using<br />

mark/recapture models for closed populations analyzed<br />

by the CAPTURE program, we were able to estimate<br />

the abundance of jaguar in the sampled area. The results<br />

of this study indicate the photographic mark/recapture<br />

technique designed for tigers can be adapted for other<br />

felids. The technique enables biologists studying jaguar<br />

to estimate population abundances and provide them<br />

with information they need to promote conservation<br />

actions based upon sound population information.<br />

Smallwood, K. S. 1994. Trends in California mountain<br />

lion populations. Southwestern Naturalist 39(1):67-72.<br />

The status of the California mountain lion (Felis concolor<br />

californica May) population has been controversial and<br />

central to disputes regarding its management. Track<br />

survey methods and transects were developed during<br />

the 1980s to provide the only standard estimate of<br />

mountain lion population trends in California. In 1992,<br />

I repeated the 1986 statewide survey for mountain lion<br />

track sets, in which a track set is any continuous trail<br />

of tracks made by the same animal. Track set density<br />

increased 313% in the mountains of southern California,<br />

but they decreased 52% in northern California, and 61%<br />

in areas where timber was removed since 1986. Most of<br />

the areas preferred by resident mountain lions in 1986<br />

were avoided in 1992 after they were clearcut. Whereas<br />

residents preferred unharvested and non-forest areas<br />

in 1992, track set densities of deer were the same with<br />

or without timber loss. Mountain lion track set density<br />

might have decreased due to degradation of habitat<br />

quality other than prey availability, or it might have<br />

decreased as part of a natural population cycle, which<br />

is common among species of Carnivora. When this<br />

decrease was added to the changes observed at three sites<br />

monitored since 1980, the pattern resembled nearly one<br />

complete cycle. Plans for management and research of<br />

mountain lions should include the effects of habitat loss<br />

and natural population dynamics.<br />

98 | SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!