13.05.2014 Views

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significant loopholes: for example in Pakistan where<br />

the species is only protected in some states, but not at<br />

federal level. Based on the CITES National Legislation<br />

Project the legislation of Afghanistan, Mongolia, Nepal,<br />

Pakistan and Uzbekistan was classified as into Category<br />

3 and is therefore believed to generally not meet the<br />

requirements for the implementation of CITES (Anon.,<br />

2002a). Likewise, the enforcement of existing laws and<br />

regulations is sometimes poor and remains a major challenge<br />

for most range states. Ineffective or non-existent<br />

enforcement of the regulations and laws in place is often<br />

due to lack of awareness, political will and priority and<br />

resources given to species conservation at governmental<br />

level. However, the economic and political situations of<br />

many of the snow leopard range states also negatively<br />

affect law enforcement activities greatly. Wildlife rangers<br />

and enforcement personnel are often poorly equipped<br />

and live on extremely low wages. In addition, corruption<br />

seems to be a rather common problem in a number of<br />

snow leopard range states and plays a considerable role<br />

in the inability of some range states to tackle wildlife<br />

crime effectively (Anon., 2003). This is not surprising<br />

given the sometimes poor salaries paid to governmental<br />

officials such as wildlife wardens and the high profits to<br />

be made from the trade in snow leopard skins and other<br />

body parts.<br />

Afghanistan<br />

No up-to-date information is currently available on<br />

the legal status of snow leopards in Afghanistan. In 2002,<br />

UNEP undertook a post-conflict environmental assessment<br />

and the findings of that assessment were published<br />

in early 2003. The report concluded, among others, that<br />

“the legal status of all protected animals in Afghanistan is<br />

currently in question and no management is taking place<br />

to protect and conserve their ecological integrity and<br />

wildlife” (UNEP, 2003). Following the events of the 11th<br />

September 2001, a project has been initiated in cooperation<br />

with the United Nations Environmental Programme<br />

to draft a legislative framework on environmental protection<br />

(Baker, 2002). The country is currently led by the<br />

Transitional Authority with a cabinet of 31 ministers.<br />

The Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry<br />

is responsible for the management of forests, wildlife,<br />

wetlands and fisheries; protected areas management was<br />

conducted in co-operation with the Afghanistan Tourist<br />

Organisation. With the new environmental policies yet<br />

to be defined, no new environmental legislation has been<br />

developed and the country’s legal system is currently<br />

governed by the constitution enacted under the monarchy<br />

in 1964 as well as by laws enacted later, provided<br />

that they are not inconsistent with the Bonn Agreement<br />

or laws adopted previously. In this regard, the Nature<br />

Protection Law of 1986 (amended in 2000) and the<br />

Hunting and Wildlife Protection Law of 2000 provide<br />

an important framework. In the absence of new environmental<br />

laws, the Transitional Authority has issued<br />

various decrees banning hunting and timber harvesting,<br />

Table III: <strong>Snow</strong> <strong>Leopard</strong> range States and their Participation in Relevant Multi Environmental Agreements.<br />

Country<br />

CITES<br />

Date of entry<br />

into force<br />

Category<br />

NLP*<br />

CMS<br />

Date of entry<br />

into force<br />

Afghanistan Yes Jan 1986 3 No -<br />

Bhutan Yes Nov 2002 No -<br />

China Yes April 1981 2 No -<br />

India Yes Oct 1976 2 Yes Nov 1983<br />

Kazakhstan Yes Jan 2000 In review No -<br />

Kyrgyzstan No - No -<br />

Mongolia Yes April 1996 3 Yes Nov 1999<br />

Nepal Yes Sept 1975 3 No -<br />

Pakistan Yes July 1976 3 Yes Dec 1987<br />

Russian Federation Yes Jan 1992 2 No -<br />

Tajikistan No - Yes Feb 2001<br />

Uzbekistan Yes Oct 1997 3 Yes Sept 1998<br />

* = National Legislation Project of CITES, based on Doc. 28 presented at CoP 12, November 2002; Category 1 =<br />

legislation is believed to meet the requirement for the implementation of CITES, Category 2 = legislation is believed not<br />

to meet all requirements, Category 3 = legislation that is believed not to meet the requirements.<br />

SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY | 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!