Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
significant loopholes: for example in Pakistan where<br />
the species is only protected in some states, but not at<br />
federal level. Based on the CITES National Legislation<br />
Project the legislation of Afghanistan, Mongolia, Nepal,<br />
Pakistan and Uzbekistan was classified as into Category<br />
3 and is therefore believed to generally not meet the<br />
requirements for the implementation of CITES (Anon.,<br />
2002a). Likewise, the enforcement of existing laws and<br />
regulations is sometimes poor and remains a major challenge<br />
for most range states. Ineffective or non-existent<br />
enforcement of the regulations and laws in place is often<br />
due to lack of awareness, political will and priority and<br />
resources given to species conservation at governmental<br />
level. However, the economic and political situations of<br />
many of the snow leopard range states also negatively<br />
affect law enforcement activities greatly. Wildlife rangers<br />
and enforcement personnel are often poorly equipped<br />
and live on extremely low wages. In addition, corruption<br />
seems to be a rather common problem in a number of<br />
snow leopard range states and plays a considerable role<br />
in the inability of some range states to tackle wildlife<br />
crime effectively (Anon., 2003). This is not surprising<br />
given the sometimes poor salaries paid to governmental<br />
officials such as wildlife wardens and the high profits to<br />
be made from the trade in snow leopard skins and other<br />
body parts.<br />
Afghanistan<br />
No up-to-date information is currently available on<br />
the legal status of snow leopards in Afghanistan. In 2002,<br />
UNEP undertook a post-conflict environmental assessment<br />
and the findings of that assessment were published<br />
in early 2003. The report concluded, among others, that<br />
“the legal status of all protected animals in Afghanistan is<br />
currently in question and no management is taking place<br />
to protect and conserve their ecological integrity and<br />
wildlife” (UNEP, 2003). Following the events of the 11th<br />
September 2001, a project has been initiated in cooperation<br />
with the United Nations Environmental Programme<br />
to draft a legislative framework on environmental protection<br />
(Baker, 2002). The country is currently led by the<br />
Transitional Authority with a cabinet of 31 ministers.<br />
The Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry<br />
is responsible for the management of forests, wildlife,<br />
wetlands and fisheries; protected areas management was<br />
conducted in co-operation with the Afghanistan Tourist<br />
Organisation. With the new environmental policies yet<br />
to be defined, no new environmental legislation has been<br />
developed and the country’s legal system is currently<br />
governed by the constitution enacted under the monarchy<br />
in 1964 as well as by laws enacted later, provided<br />
that they are not inconsistent with the Bonn Agreement<br />
or laws adopted previously. In this regard, the Nature<br />
Protection Law of 1986 (amended in 2000) and the<br />
Hunting and Wildlife Protection Law of 2000 provide<br />
an important framework. In the absence of new environmental<br />
laws, the Transitional Authority has issued<br />
various decrees banning hunting and timber harvesting,<br />
Table III: <strong>Snow</strong> <strong>Leopard</strong> range States and their Participation in Relevant Multi Environmental Agreements.<br />
Country<br />
CITES<br />
Date of entry<br />
into force<br />
Category<br />
NLP*<br />
CMS<br />
Date of entry<br />
into force<br />
Afghanistan Yes Jan 1986 3 No -<br />
Bhutan Yes Nov 2002 No -<br />
China Yes April 1981 2 No -<br />
India Yes Oct 1976 2 Yes Nov 1983<br />
Kazakhstan Yes Jan 2000 In review No -<br />
Kyrgyzstan No - No -<br />
Mongolia Yes April 1996 3 Yes Nov 1999<br />
Nepal Yes Sept 1975 3 No -<br />
Pakistan Yes July 1976 3 Yes Dec 1987<br />
Russian Federation Yes Jan 1992 2 No -<br />
Tajikistan No - Yes Feb 2001<br />
Uzbekistan Yes Oct 1997 3 Yes Sept 1998<br />
* = National Legislation Project of CITES, based on Doc. 28 presented at CoP 12, November 2002; Category 1 =<br />
legislation is believed to meet the requirement for the implementation of CITES, Category 2 = legislation is believed not<br />
to meet all requirements, Category 3 = legislation that is believed not to meet the requirements.<br />
SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY | 25