Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were post hoc and harvests were probably biased by Stateimposed<br />
harvest quotas; therefore, statistically significant<br />
harvest trends may or may not reflect population trends.<br />
Gazelle, wolf, marmot, and fox harvests demonstrated<br />
significant decreasing trends, while polecats and rabbits<br />
displayed no significant trends. Analyses suggest that<br />
government-imposed harvest quotas influenced actual<br />
harvests of marmots and foxes. The effect of year on<br />
actual harvests was important for gazelle, wolves, and<br />
marmots, and may reflect population changes. Reports<br />
suggest that poaching is an important source of mortality<br />
for gazelle and marmots. Several other studies report<br />
declines in numbers of Mongolian gazelle, which once<br />
migrated in the millions across most of Mongolia.<br />
Wolves are strongly disliked and heavily persecuted<br />
by local nomads, officials, and biologists at all levels<br />
of government. All species harvested commercially<br />
in Dornod Aimag require more careful conservation<br />
management to ensure the continued existence of viable<br />
populations. Currently, little management or monitoring<br />
is occurring.<br />
Rempel, R. S., P. C. Elkie, A. R. Rodgers and M. J. Gluck.<br />
1997. Timber-management and natural-disturbance<br />
effects on moose habitat: Landscape evaluation.<br />
Journal of Wildlife Management 61(2):17-524.<br />
We used 16 years of survey data for a moose population,<br />
and 3 Landsat satellite scenes, spanning 19 years, to<br />
evaluate the hypotheses that Ontario’s Moose Habitat<br />
Guidelines for timber harvest: (1) mitigate the effects<br />
of unmodified clearcuts on moose populations, and<br />
(2) create enhanced habitat with greater interspersion<br />
of forage with cover and higher habitat suitability<br />
indices than areas dominated by unmodified clearcuts.<br />
The 5 study landscapes compared were 16,000-91,000<br />
ha, and included landscape disturbance from timbermanagement<br />
and wildfire-burn, and landscapes with and<br />
without hunter access. Moose density differed among<br />
landscapes, but while neither main effects of hunter<br />
access (P = 0.083), nor landscape disturbance (P = 0.31)<br />
were significant, their interactions were (P = 0.003), with<br />
density increasing if disturbance occurs without hunter<br />
access. The habitat suitability index in the wildfire burn<br />
was similar (0.80) to both the modified and unmodified<br />
clearcut (0.85 and 0.83), and population rate of increase<br />
was positive in both the burn (B = 0.153, P < 0.0001)<br />
and the unmodified clearcut (B = 0.127, P < 0.0001). The<br />
population did not increase in the modified clearcut (B =<br />
-0.016, P = 0.9901) because hunter access increased as a<br />
consequence of high road density.<br />
Riordan, P. 1998. Unsupervised recognition of<br />
individual tigers and snow leopards from their<br />
footprints. Animal Conservation 1:253-262.<br />
This study presents the testing of two unsupervised<br />
classification methods for their ability to accurately<br />
identify unknown individual tigers, <strong>Panthera</strong> tigris, and<br />
snow leopards, <strong>Panthera</strong> uncia, from their footprints.<br />
A neural-network based method, the Kohonen selforganizing<br />
map (SOM), and a Bayesian method,<br />
AutoClass, were assessed using hind footprints taken<br />
from captive animals under standardized conditions.<br />
AutoClass successfully discriminated individuals of both<br />
species from their footprints. Classification accuracy<br />
was greatest for tigers, with more misclassification of<br />
individuals occurring for snow leopards. Examination<br />
of variable influence on class formations failed to<br />
identify consistently influential measurements for<br />
either species. The self-organizing map did not provide<br />
accurate classification of individuals for either species.<br />
Results were not substantially improved by altering<br />
map dimensions nor by using principal components<br />
derived from the original data. The interpretation of<br />
resulting classifications and the importance of using<br />
such techniques in the study of wild animal populations<br />
are discussed. The need for further testing in the field is<br />
highlighted.<br />
Roe, D., T. Mulliken, S. Milledge, J. Mremi, S. Mosha<br />
and M. Grieg-Gran. 2002. Making a Killing or Making<br />
a Living? Wildlife trade, trade controls and rural<br />
livelihoods. Biodiversity and Livelihoods Issues No.6.<br />
The report shows how wildlife products commonly found<br />
on shop shelves often owe their origins to harvesters<br />
living thousands of miles away and the importance these<br />
products can play to the livelihoods of these people. For<br />
the poorest groups, wildlife trade may provide one of<br />
the few opportunities for earning cash income which,<br />
even in small amounts, can make a critical difference<br />
to livelihood security. The report focuses specifically on<br />
the impacts of trade controls linked to the Convention on<br />
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna<br />
and Flora (CITES).<br />
Roelke M.E., D.J. Forrester, E.R. Jacobson, G.V. Kollias,<br />
F.W. Scott, M.C. Barr, J.F. Evermann and E.C. Pirtle.<br />
1933. Seroprevalence of infectious disease agents in<br />
free-ranging Florida panthers (Felis concolor coryi).<br />
Journal of Wildlife Diseases 29:36-49.<br />
Serum samples obtained from 38 free-ranging Florida<br />
panthers (Felis concolor coryi) in southern Florida, March<br />
1978 through February 1991, were tested for antibodies<br />
against eight bacterial, parasitic, and viral disease<br />
agents. Sera were positive for antibodies against feline<br />
panleukopenia virus (FPV) (78%), feline calicivirus<br />
(56%), feline immunodeficiency virus/puma lentivirus<br />
(37%), feline enteric coronavirus/feline infectious<br />
peritonitis virus (19%), and Toxoplasma gondii (9%).<br />
All samples were seronegative for Brucella spp., feline<br />
rhinotracheitis virus, and pseudorabies virus. In addition,<br />
all the animals tested were negative for feline leukemia<br />
virus p27 antigen as determined by enzyme-linked<br />
immunosorbent assay. Feline panleukopenia virus was<br />
considered to be a potentially significant disease agent;<br />
SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY | 95