13.05.2014 Views

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were post hoc and harvests were probably biased by Stateimposed<br />

harvest quotas; therefore, statistically significant<br />

harvest trends may or may not reflect population trends.<br />

Gazelle, wolf, marmot, and fox harvests demonstrated<br />

significant decreasing trends, while polecats and rabbits<br />

displayed no significant trends. Analyses suggest that<br />

government-imposed harvest quotas influenced actual<br />

harvests of marmots and foxes. The effect of year on<br />

actual harvests was important for gazelle, wolves, and<br />

marmots, and may reflect population changes. Reports<br />

suggest that poaching is an important source of mortality<br />

for gazelle and marmots. Several other studies report<br />

declines in numbers of Mongolian gazelle, which once<br />

migrated in the millions across most of Mongolia.<br />

Wolves are strongly disliked and heavily persecuted<br />

by local nomads, officials, and biologists at all levels<br />

of government. All species harvested commercially<br />

in Dornod Aimag require more careful conservation<br />

management to ensure the continued existence of viable<br />

populations. Currently, little management or monitoring<br />

is occurring.<br />

Rempel, R. S., P. C. Elkie, A. R. Rodgers and M. J. Gluck.<br />

1997. Timber-management and natural-disturbance<br />

effects on moose habitat: Landscape evaluation.<br />

Journal of Wildlife Management 61(2):17-524.<br />

We used 16 years of survey data for a moose population,<br />

and 3 Landsat satellite scenes, spanning 19 years, to<br />

evaluate the hypotheses that Ontario’s Moose Habitat<br />

Guidelines for timber harvest: (1) mitigate the effects<br />

of unmodified clearcuts on moose populations, and<br />

(2) create enhanced habitat with greater interspersion<br />

of forage with cover and higher habitat suitability<br />

indices than areas dominated by unmodified clearcuts.<br />

The 5 study landscapes compared were 16,000-91,000<br />

ha, and included landscape disturbance from timbermanagement<br />

and wildfire-burn, and landscapes with and<br />

without hunter access. Moose density differed among<br />

landscapes, but while neither main effects of hunter<br />

access (P = 0.083), nor landscape disturbance (P = 0.31)<br />

were significant, their interactions were (P = 0.003), with<br />

density increasing if disturbance occurs without hunter<br />

access. The habitat suitability index in the wildfire burn<br />

was similar (0.80) to both the modified and unmodified<br />

clearcut (0.85 and 0.83), and population rate of increase<br />

was positive in both the burn (B = 0.153, P < 0.0001)<br />

and the unmodified clearcut (B = 0.127, P < 0.0001). The<br />

population did not increase in the modified clearcut (B =<br />

-0.016, P = 0.9901) because hunter access increased as a<br />

consequence of high road density.<br />

Riordan, P. 1998. Unsupervised recognition of<br />

individual tigers and snow leopards from their<br />

footprints. Animal Conservation 1:253-262.<br />

This study presents the testing of two unsupervised<br />

classification methods for their ability to accurately<br />

identify unknown individual tigers, <strong>Panthera</strong> tigris, and<br />

snow leopards, <strong>Panthera</strong> uncia, from their footprints.<br />

A neural-network based method, the Kohonen selforganizing<br />

map (SOM), and a Bayesian method,<br />

AutoClass, were assessed using hind footprints taken<br />

from captive animals under standardized conditions.<br />

AutoClass successfully discriminated individuals of both<br />

species from their footprints. Classification accuracy<br />

was greatest for tigers, with more misclassification of<br />

individuals occurring for snow leopards. Examination<br />

of variable influence on class formations failed to<br />

identify consistently influential measurements for<br />

either species. The self-organizing map did not provide<br />

accurate classification of individuals for either species.<br />

Results were not substantially improved by altering<br />

map dimensions nor by using principal components<br />

derived from the original data. The interpretation of<br />

resulting classifications and the importance of using<br />

such techniques in the study of wild animal populations<br />

are discussed. The need for further testing in the field is<br />

highlighted.<br />

Roe, D., T. Mulliken, S. Milledge, J. Mremi, S. Mosha<br />

and M. Grieg-Gran. 2002. Making a Killing or Making<br />

a Living? Wildlife trade, trade controls and rural<br />

livelihoods. Biodiversity and Livelihoods Issues No.6.<br />

The report shows how wildlife products commonly found<br />

on shop shelves often owe their origins to harvesters<br />

living thousands of miles away and the importance these<br />

products can play to the livelihoods of these people. For<br />

the poorest groups, wildlife trade may provide one of<br />

the few opportunities for earning cash income which,<br />

even in small amounts, can make a critical difference<br />

to livelihood security. The report focuses specifically on<br />

the impacts of trade controls linked to the Convention on<br />

International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna<br />

and Flora (CITES).<br />

Roelke M.E., D.J. Forrester, E.R. Jacobson, G.V. Kollias,<br />

F.W. Scott, M.C. Barr, J.F. Evermann and E.C. Pirtle.<br />

1933. Seroprevalence of infectious disease agents in<br />

free-ranging Florida panthers (Felis concolor coryi).<br />

Journal of Wildlife Diseases 29:36-49.<br />

Serum samples obtained from 38 free-ranging Florida<br />

panthers (Felis concolor coryi) in southern Florida, March<br />

1978 through February 1991, were tested for antibodies<br />

against eight bacterial, parasitic, and viral disease<br />

agents. Sera were positive for antibodies against feline<br />

panleukopenia virus (FPV) (78%), feline calicivirus<br />

(56%), feline immunodeficiency virus/puma lentivirus<br />

(37%), feline enteric coronavirus/feline infectious<br />

peritonitis virus (19%), and Toxoplasma gondii (9%).<br />

All samples were seronegative for Brucella spp., feline<br />

rhinotracheitis virus, and pseudorabies virus. In addition,<br />

all the animals tested were negative for feline leukemia<br />

virus p27 antigen as determined by enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay. Feline panleukopenia virus was<br />

considered to be a potentially significant disease agent;<br />

SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY | 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!