Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
for 62% of the area in panther home ranges. We used<br />
correlation and discriminant function analyses to assess<br />
the potential importance of 20 landscape features. These<br />
panther locations were effectively distinguished from<br />
random points using four landscape variables: (1) the<br />
size of a contiguous patch of preferred land cover; (2)<br />
the proximity to preferred land cover; (3) the diversity<br />
of three preferred cover types within a window 120 x<br />
120 m, and (4) the matrix within which preferred cover<br />
types occurred 83% of the panther locations and 81.9%<br />
of the random points were correctly classified based on<br />
a linear model constructed using these four variables.<br />
Large, contiguous areas of preferred land-cover types<br />
were especially important because 96% of all panther<br />
locations occurred within 90 m of preferred land cover.<br />
The average preferred forest patch size that was used by<br />
these panthers was 20,816 ha, and a regression equation<br />
suggests that patches larger than 500 ha are important.<br />
Maps of panther habitat suitability were developed using<br />
coefficients derived from discriminant analysis. Large<br />
areas of suitable land cover that are heavily used by<br />
panthers occur on private ranches covering 3606 km 2 .<br />
Conservation of preferred habitat on these private lands<br />
is essential to maintaining a free-ranging population of<br />
panthers in southwest Florida.<br />
Maehr, D. S. and C. T. Moore. 1992. Models of mass<br />
growth for 3 North-American cougar populations.<br />
Journal of Wildlife Management 56(4):700-707.<br />
Previous studies of cougar (Felis concolor) physiology<br />
and population dynamics relied on growth curves of<br />
cougars obtained from diverse locations and under various<br />
rearing conditions. We were concerned about potential<br />
biases in studies that make but do not test the implicit<br />
assumption of homogeneity of growth characteristics<br />
among collection sites. Thus, we compared body masses<br />
of wild cougars from populations in Florida (F. c.<br />
coryi), Nevada (F. c. kaibabensis), and California (F. c.<br />
californica). We modeled mass as a nonlinear Richards<br />
function of age for each sex and population demographic<br />
group. Groups were consistent with respect to estimated<br />
birth mass and location of the inflection point of the<br />
growth curve. Adult mass was greater (P < 0.001) in<br />
males than females in all populations, and the size of<br />
the difference was similar among populations. Estimated<br />
adult masses of Florida and California cougars were not<br />
different (P = 0.381) from each other but were less (P <<br />
0.001) than that of adult Nevada cougars. Growth rate<br />
varied by population but not by sex; Nevada cougars<br />
grew fastest to adult mass. Cougar mass is too variable<br />
to serve alone as an indicator of age beyond 24 months.<br />
Failure to control for population-specific influences on<br />
growth may bias inferences about growth.<br />
Manfredo, M.J., H.C. Zinn, L. Sikorowski and J.<br />
Jones. 1998. Public acceptance of mountain lion<br />
management: a case study of Denver, Colorado, and<br />
nearby foothills areas Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:<br />
964-970.<br />
We propose that information about public attitudes<br />
toward mountain lion (Puma concolor) management<br />
practices is most useful when it accounts for the specific<br />
context of human- mountain lion encounter situations.<br />
A mail survey was used to assess public acceptance of<br />
4 management actions involving mountain lions in 4<br />
encounter situations occurring at 2 types of locations.<br />
Results showed strong support for the hypothesis that<br />
acceptance of management actions depends on the<br />
specific circumstances of the situations. We suggest<br />
that mountain lion management policies should account<br />
for a range of contingencies and that future studies of<br />
attitudes toward management actions should consider the<br />
importance of attitude specificity.<br />
Mazzolli, M., M. E. Graipel and N. Dunstone. 2002.<br />
Mountain lion depredation in southern Brazil.<br />
Biological Conservation 105(1):43-51.<br />
Mountain lion (Puma concolor) depredation incidents<br />
on livestock herds were recorded at 15 ranches in<br />
southern Brazil from 1993 to 1995. Maximum losses<br />
to mountain lions were 78% for goats, 84% for sheep,<br />
and 16% for cattle. Cattle mortality arising from causes<br />
other than depredation assumed a greater importance<br />
in herd productivity. In contrast, attacks on sheep and<br />
goats were more frequent than losses to other causes, but<br />
could be reduced to acceptable levels when Rocks were<br />
corralled at night. Most depredation incidents occurred<br />
when weather and light conditions were unfavorable to<br />
human activity. We explain these patterns and inter-ranch<br />
variation in depredation rates on the basis of a riskavoidance<br />
strategy by the mountain lions. Stock losses<br />
can be minimized by understanding these patterns and by<br />
applying appropriate herd husbandry, thus reducing the<br />
urge to persecute this protected species.<br />
McCarthy, T. M. 2000. Ecology and conservation of<br />
snow leopards, Gobi brown bears, and wild Bactrian<br />
camels in Mongolia . Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. of<br />
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. 133 pp.<br />
A GIS map of snow leopard range in Mongolia was<br />
produced using extensive sign data collected using<br />
the SLIMS methodology. This was combined with<br />
information gained through extensive interviews<br />
with local people and historic data from Russian and<br />
Mongolian expeditions. The map did not rely on digital<br />
imagery, but on polygons hand-drawn on 1:500,000<br />
basemaps using elevation as the sole habitat parameter of<br />
interest. In this regard the map is better ground-truthed<br />
than the Hunter-Jackson model, but less well supported<br />
by habitat parameter data.<br />
McDaniel, G. W., K. S. McKelvey, J. R. Squires and L.<br />
F. Ruggiero. 2000. Efficacy of lures and hair snares to<br />
SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY | 85