13.05.2014 Views

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

Snow Leopard Survival Strategy - Panthera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

system to be important for brown bear habitat were the<br />

percentage of forest (positive), proximity to settlements<br />

(negative) and elevation above see (positive), however<br />

the decision tree did not account for habitat patch size.<br />

After filtering out habitat patches smaller than 5000 ha<br />

in GIS, the accuracy increased to 89% (KHAT 77%).<br />

Whereas 88% of the habitat was within forests, only 33%<br />

of all forests were considered suitable as habitat.<br />

Linnell, J.D.C., J. Odden, M.E. Smith, R. Aanes and J.E.<br />

Swenson. 1999. Large carnivores that kill livestock:<br />

do “problem individuals” really exist? Wildlife Society<br />

Bulletin 27:698-705.<br />

Recovery of large carnivore populations often leads to<br />

conflicts with livestock. As an alternative to widespread<br />

control, there has been much focus on selective removal<br />

of problem individuals. However, it is not always clear<br />

if problem individuals really exist. Through a review<br />

of the literature we examine the conceptual nature of<br />

problem individuals, and the evidence for and against<br />

their existence. The potential for individual and gender<br />

specific differences in livestock killing behavior exists<br />

among carnivores. In contrast to expectations, it does<br />

not appear that inexperienced juveniles and infirm<br />

adults are often involved in excessive depredation,<br />

while it does appear that adult males are responsible<br />

for a disproportionate amount of livestock depredation.<br />

The form of husbandry in use is hypothesized to be<br />

an important factor in the development of problem<br />

individuals. Much more research on individual predation<br />

behavior is urgently required.<br />

Linnell, J. D. C., J. E. Swenson, R. Andersen and B.<br />

Barnes. 2000. How vulnerable are denning bears to<br />

disturbance? Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(2):400-413.<br />

When exposed to human disturbance, most large<br />

carnivores are able to move away from the source<br />

with little energetic cost. Bears represent an exception<br />

in that during winter, most individuals spend several<br />

months in an energy-saving state of hibernation in a den.<br />

This implies that disturbance of denning bears has the<br />

potential to have a large energetic cost, although data on<br />

the subject are rather diffuse. We reviewed the literature<br />

on densite selection, denning physiology, and responses<br />

to disturbance for the brown bear (Ursus arctos), black<br />

bear (U. americanus), and polar bear (U. maritimus).<br />

Generally, bears select dens one to 2 km from human<br />

activity (roads, habitation, industrial activity) and seemed<br />

to tolerate most activities that occurred more than one km<br />

from the den. Activity closer than one km and especially<br />

within 200 m caused variable responses. Some bears<br />

tolerate disturbance even inside the den, but bears will<br />

abandon dens in response to activity within this zone,<br />

especially early in the denning period. Den abandonment<br />

by brown and black bear females with cubs of the year<br />

can lead to increased cub mortality. Specific excavated<br />

or ground dens are rarely reused, whereas natural caves<br />

or hollow trees are reused with varying frequency. There<br />

is often some distance between an individual bear’s<br />

consecutive dens. This indicates that loss of a single<br />

denning area following human disturbance will not<br />

always lead to deleterious effects, if alternative denning<br />

areas are available within the home range.<br />

Maehr, D. S. and G. B. Caddick. 1995. Demographics<br />

and genetic introgression in the Florida panther.<br />

Conservation Biology 9(5):1295-1298.<br />

With the release of eight female Texas cougars (Felis<br />

concolor stanleyana) into south Florida between March<br />

and July 1995, natural resource agencies have embarked<br />

on a task that is intended to restore the genetic integrity<br />

of the Florida panther (F. c. coryi). Although this<br />

intentional genetic introgression may, if successful,<br />

eliminate phenotypic characters that are presumed to<br />

derive from inbreeding, there is insufficient evidence<br />

to support the contention that such drastic management<br />

is currently necessary. Early panther research (1981-<br />

1985) resulted in the impression that a remnant<br />

population of panthers in south Florida was composed<br />

of old, nonreproductive individuals suffering from<br />

heavy parasitism, malnutrition, maladaptive phenotypic<br />

characters, and a high rate of road mortality (Alvarez<br />

1993; Meffe & Carroll 1994: 229; Foster & Humphrey<br />

1995; but see Maehr et al. 1991a). More recently, cardiac<br />

and male-reproductive anomalies have been cited as<br />

evidence of inbreeding and as immediate threats to<br />

the survival of the subspecies (Roelke & Glass 1992;<br />

Roelke et al. 1993a). No male reproductive failures have<br />

been observed in the population, however, and cardiac<br />

problems were involved in only two known deaths<br />

that were confounded by captive management of those<br />

individuals. One of these occurred after a “rehabilitated,”<br />

road-injured adult male was returned to the wild with<br />

severely worn canines resulting from his efforts to escape<br />

captivity. The other was a young adult female that died<br />

immediately after surgery to correct a heart abnormality.<br />

The notions of genetic and demographic collapse endure<br />

to this day despite data that suggest otherwise.<br />

Maehr, D. S. and J. A. Cox. 1995. Landscape features<br />

and panthers in Florida. Conservation Biology 9(5):<br />

1008-1019.<br />

We used a geographic information system (GIS) to<br />

document spatial associations of Florida panthers, land<br />

cover, and other geographical features. Panther radio<br />

locations (n = 14,548) occurred in hardwood hammock:<br />

mixed hardwood swamp, and cypress swamp in greater<br />

proportion than in randomly positioned points (n =<br />

8500). Panther radio locations occurred less frequently<br />

in agricultural, barren, and shrub and brush land cover.<br />

Panther home ranges consisted of a combination<br />

of preferred and avoided cover types, including<br />

freshwater marsh, cypress swamp, hardwood swamp,<br />

and agricultural land. These cover types accounted<br />

84 | SNOW LEOPARD SURVIVAL STRATEGY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!