16.05.2014 Views

Attachment tables only (PDF - 363 Kb)

Attachment tables only (PDF - 363 Kb)

Attachment tables only (PDF - 363 Kb)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 13A.66<br />

Table 13A.66<br />

HACC National Service Standards appraisals — results of<br />

appraisals (a), (b)<br />

Unit NSW Vic Qld (c) WA SA Tas (d) ACT (e) NT Aust<br />

Appraisal outcomes<br />

2004-05<br />

High (17.5 - 20) no. 104 .. 150 .. 12 .. .. .. 266<br />

Good (15-17.4) no. 38 .. 50 .. 9 .. .. .. 97<br />

Basic (10-14.9) no. 1 .. 15 .. 7 .. .. .. 23<br />

Poor (less than 10) no. – .. 3 .. 2 .. .. .. 5<br />

Average Score no. 17.8 .. 18.0 .. 15.9 .. .. .. 17.8<br />

2005-06<br />

High (17.5 - 20) no. 258 .. 135 .. 16 .. .. .. 409<br />

Good (15-17.4) no. 69 .. 34 .. 8 .. .. .. 111<br />

Basic (10-14.9) no. 45 .. 25 .. 10 .. .. .. 80<br />

Poor (less than 10) no. 1 .. 10 .. 5 .. .. .. 16<br />

Average Score no. 17.8 .. 17.6 .. 15.0 .. .. .. 17.6<br />

2006-07<br />

High (17.5 - 20) no. 336 86 181 .. 38 18 .. .. 659<br />

Good (15-17.4) no. 38 46 66 .. 21 4 .. .. 175<br />

Basic (10-14.9) no. 57 25 37 .. 12 3 .. .. 134<br />

Poor (less than 10) no. 8 9 5 .. 4 1 .. .. 27<br />

Average Score no. 18.0 16.7 18.0 .. 16.8 17.1 .. .. 17.7<br />

2007-08<br />

High (17.5 - 20) no. 299 76 216 88 23 11 .. 1 714<br />

Good (15-17.4) no. 81 28 25 11 4 5 .. 4 158<br />

Basic (10-14.9) no. 64 46 8 16 5 7 .. 4 150<br />

Poor (less than 10) no. 12 22 3 8 3 4 .. 1 53<br />

Average Score no. 17.4 15.3 19.5 17.0 16.1 15.4 .. 15.0 17.4<br />

2004-05 to 2007-08<br />

High (17.5 - 20) no. 997 162 682 88 89 29 .. 1 2 048<br />

Good (15-17.4) no. 226 74 175 11 42 9 .. 4 541<br />

Basic (10-14.9) no. 167 71 85 16 34 10 .. 4 387<br />

Poor (less than 10) no. 21 31 21 8 14 5 .. 1 101<br />

Average Score (f) no. 17.7 16.0 18.3 17.0 16.1 16.2 .. 15.0 17.5<br />

(a) Not all HACC agencies were required to undergo external assessment, and some are exempt, so the<br />

number of HACC agencies may be higher than those listed.<br />

(b) The results of the appraisals will, in addition, reflect different methodologies applied across each State<br />

and Territory.<br />

(c) In Queensland some agencies were reviewed twice in the four year period. This table includes<br />

outcomes of all appraisals during the cycle.<br />

(d) One agency in Tasmania declined the appraisal process in 2006-07 and was therefore scored as zero.<br />

REPORT ON<br />

GOVERNMENT<br />

SERVICES 2009<br />

AGED CARE<br />

SERVICES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!