Vital Statistics Commission of Jamaica - Planning Institute of Jamaica
Vital Statistics Commission of Jamaica - Planning Institute of Jamaica
Vital Statistics Commission of Jamaica - Planning Institute of Jamaica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Audit <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vital</strong> Registration and <strong>Vital</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> Systems: <strong>Jamaica</strong><br />
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
The findings point to core challenges which are the absence <strong>of</strong> a standard definition <strong>of</strong> vital<br />
statistics, ineffective inter-agency communication, a lack <strong>of</strong> accountability, and insufficient<br />
management control processes.<br />
Our fundamental recommendation is that all vital statistics produced by the <strong>Jamaica</strong>n<br />
government and/or its respective ministries and agencies should utilize the same standard<br />
data sets, methodologies, and definitions.<br />
The collection and production <strong>of</strong> vital statistics is a process (see Exhibit A, Flow Chart “<strong>Vital</strong><br />
<strong>Statistics</strong> Data Collection, Analysis, and Production, Proposed Flow <strong>of</strong> Data). The RGD<br />
should be responsible for producing annual “vital statistics data sets” containing information<br />
on births and deaths (including fetal deaths, if desired) which would be extracts from the<br />
current registration databases. These annual data sets should be based on the year <strong>of</strong><br />
occurrence rather than the year <strong>of</strong> registration. In collaboration with STATIN and PIOJ, the<br />
RGD should set a cut<strong>of</strong>f date approximately two months after the end <strong>of</strong> the calendar year at<br />
which point a “preliminary” data set should be released in order to satisfy the publication<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> STATIN and PIOJ (three months from the end <strong>of</strong> the calendar year).<br />
Approximately 12 months from the end <strong>of</strong> the calendar year, the RGD should release a<br />
“final” data set for that year. This data set should be the <strong>of</strong>ficial source for vital statistics and<br />
should remain static. Recognizing that all vital events may not be captured completely at the<br />
12 month mark, the registration databases should be updated continuously. The RGD should<br />
publish annually a set <strong>of</strong> technical notes with a description <strong>of</strong> the data collection process and<br />
the methodologies utilized to construct the vital statistics data sets, including control totals.<br />
In addition, the RGD should track on an annual basis, and publish in the technical notes, the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> events registered after the preliminary and final cut<strong>of</strong>f dates. This will serve to<br />
provide a means for evaluating the completeness <strong>of</strong> the statistical data sets.<br />
STATIN should be responsible for producing and publishing <strong>of</strong>ficial “vital statistic reports”<br />
including statistics generated from the data sets generated by the RGD. STATIN should<br />
publish annually a set <strong>of</strong> technical notes detailing the methodologies, definitions, and<br />
procedures used to produce its statistics. It is critical that these statistics be replicable by<br />
others (e.g., PIOJ) using the same data sets. Preliminary vital statistics should be used by<br />
STATIN (and PIOJ) in its annual reports as estimates <strong>of</strong> the most recent data available and<br />
should be prominently identified as preliminary. In subsequent annual reports, the<br />
preliminary statistics should be replaced by final statistics generated from the final data sets.<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> vital statistics data quality and completeness carried out by or funded by<br />
government agencies should involve all key stakeholders in the conceptual stages. At the<br />
very least, research protocols and reports <strong>of</strong> findings should be subject to a clearance process<br />
in which each stakeholder agency has the opportunity to comment. Every effort should be<br />
made to ensure that the results <strong>of</strong> such studies are presented constructively with the express<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> improving data quality and completeness.<br />
14