30.05.2014 Views

Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive

Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive

Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actually give this special sign a name. In that example, the text says, '<strong>The</strong> sign of the conclusion of the<br />

fifth jubilee falls during (the priestly course of) Jeshebeab.' <strong>The</strong> meaning is that Jeshebeab is the<br />

course Calendrical Texts and Priestly Courser 129<br />

1 and 4 in the cycle, only two priestly courses give their names to otot years: Shecaniah and Gamul.<br />

Further, the cycle begins with Shecaniah. This oddity results because at the Creation there had been<br />

no prior intercalation. Accordingly the reference is to the course in service when intercalation was<br />

first necessary in Year 3.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of the present text is to record all such concordant years until the cycle begins to repeat,<br />

and to align that cycle with both the seven-year cycle of sabbatical years and the 'jubilees' that<br />

measured longer periods of time. An otot cycle of 294 years emerges (6 x 49). <strong>The</strong> text also counts all<br />

the otot years and takes special notice when such a year coincides with a sabbatical year. It names<br />

each special year by the relevant priestly course and also names each jubilee (in a more complicated<br />

way, however, as explained below). But in constructing this alignment of the sexennial priestly<br />

rotation with the jubilees, the text encounters a basic difficulty: 49 is not precisely divisible by 6. <strong>The</strong><br />

otot years will therefore not always fall at the beginning and end of jubilee periods. As a consequence<br />

the text uses 'jubilee' in two slightly different senses. <strong>The</strong> term refers first to that period (only<br />

approximating to 49 years) that aligns with the cycle of otot. We can call this the 'jubilee of the otot'.<br />

At other times the term denotes the actual period of 49 years. At the end of 294 years the differences<br />

are made good as Table 2 illustrates:<br />

<strong>The</strong> text relates the 'jubilee of the otot' to the actual 49-year jubilee in two ways. <strong>The</strong> first is through<br />

its reference to the 'sign of the conclusion of the jubilee'. Only once, in 2:18-19, does the author<br />

actually give this special sign a name. In that example, the text says, '<strong>The</strong> sign of the conclusion of the<br />

fifth jubilee falls during (the priestly course of) Jeshebeab.' <strong>The</strong> meaning is that Jeshebeab is the<br />

course serving in the temple at the end of the fifth actual jubilee - that is, as year 196 (4 x 49) comes<br />

to an end. If the author had wished, he could have given the names of all the 'signs of the conclusion<br />

of the jubilee' (they are respectively Jedaiah, Mijamin, Shecaniah, Jeshebeab, Happizzez and Gamul).<br />

<strong>The</strong> second way of relating the 'jubilee of the otot' to the actual 49-year jubilee involves the names the<br />

author gives to the jubilees. <strong>The</strong>se names are always either Gamul or Shecaniah. <strong>The</strong> writer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!