30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

186 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL<br />

because they did harm to the son of the heavenly<br />

God. . . .<br />

Then when the Hebrews reap the bad harvest,<br />

a Roman king will ravage much gold and silver.<br />

Thereafter there will be other kingdoms<br />

continuously, as kingdoms perish<br />

and they will afflict mortals. But there will be<br />

a great fall for those men when they launch on<br />

unjust haughtiness.<br />

But when the temple of Solomon falls in the illustrious<br />

land<br />

cast down by men of barbarian speech<br />

with bronze breastplates, the Hebrews will be<br />

driven from their land;<br />

wandering, being slaughtered, they will mix much<br />

darnels in their wheat.<br />

There will be evil strife for all men;<br />

and the cities, violated in turn,<br />

will weep for each other on receiving the wrath of<br />

the great<br />

God in their bosom, since they committed an evil<br />

deed. 85<br />

Collins notes the reference to the Roman king and states that it is “an<br />

obvious reference to the defeat of the Jews in A.D. 70”; he further<br />

notes that the reference to Solomon’s Temple in verse 393 “refers to<br />

the same event.”8G Here is a clear Christian reference – and assuredly<br />

an early one — to the destruction of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> as a vindication<br />

of Christianity and a judgment on the Jews for harming “the son<br />

of the heavenly God.”<br />

Second, the Jewish writers of this era (and shortly thereafter) feel<br />

the pain and anguish of the loss of<strong>Jerusalem</strong>, a pain that cannot but<br />

be useful to those who follow the One who prophesied its destruction,<br />

Jesus Christ (Matt. 24:2, parallels).<br />

2 Esdras is almost certainly to be dated about the year 100 in its<br />

original form. This date is argued by such noted scholars as G. H.<br />

85. Ibid. 1 :343f.<br />

86. Ibid. 1 :344n.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!