30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T/w Nero Redivivus Myth 303<br />

throne are recorded to have employed the myth in quests for power.<br />

In the pagan literature references to the expectation of Nero’s return<br />

after his fall from power can be found in the writings of Tacitus,<br />

Suetonius, Dio Cassius, Xiphilinus, Zonaras, and Dion Chrysostom.<br />

12 Among Jewish Talmudists the myth surfaces in the tract<br />

Gittin, 13 The Ascension of Isaiah (4:2ff), as well as in the Jewish<br />

Sibylline Oracles. In Christian circles it is mentioned in books by<br />

Lactantius, Sulpicius Severus, Jerome, and Augustine. 14 Several Sibylline<br />

Oracles of various origins – Christian, Jewish, and pagan – use<br />

the myth, as well. 15<br />

Clearly the existence, spread, and influence of the Nero Rediviuus<br />

myth cannot be disputed. It is a unique legend in all of political<br />

history. But the questions that must here be dealt with are: Does<br />

Revelation employ the myth? And if it does, does the employment of<br />

it necessitate a late date for the composition of Revelation?<br />

Early Date Response<br />

if the Myth Be Accepted<br />

Despite the confidence with which some late date advocates<br />

employ the Nero Redivivus myth, it is of more than a little interest to<br />

note briefly two intriguing facts. First, not all late date proponents<br />

allow the argument as si~ificant to the question of the dating of<br />

Revelation. While establishing the arguments for the Domitianic date<br />

for Revelation, Guthrie, a most able late date adherent, considers the<br />

merits of the Nero Redivivus argument, but discourages its endorsement<br />

in the debate: “[1] t must be regarded as extremely inconclusive<br />

for a Domitianic date. The most that can be said is that it may<br />

possibly point to this.” 16<br />

Astonishingly, Mounce uses the myth as an evidence for the late<br />

date of Revelation in his introduction to his commentary, but then<br />

12. Taeitus, Histories 1 :2; 2:8, 9; Suetonius, Nero 40, 57; Domitian 6; Dio Cassius, Roman<br />

Histo~ 63:9:3; 66: 19:3; Xiphilinus 64:9; Zonaras, Annals 11:151-8; and Dion Chyrsostom,<br />

Oratwru21.<br />

13. See Frederic W. Farrar, T/u Ear~ Days of Christiati~ (New York: Cassell, 1884),<br />

p. 467.<br />

14. Lactantius, On The Death of the Persecutors 2; Sulpicius Severus, Sacred Hi.stoT 2:28;<br />

Jerome, Daniel 11 :28; and Augustine, The Ci~ of God 2019:3.<br />

15. Si@lline Orackn 3:63ff.; 4: 1151Y; 5:331T,; 8:68ff.; 12:78; 13:89fE<br />

16. Donald Guthrie, New Te$tamcmt Zrztroductzms, 3rd ed. (Downers Grove, IL: Inter-<br />

Varsity Press, 1970), p. 954.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!