30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL<br />

all, as Reuss observed, “Ideas of the Apocalypse are so widely different<br />

that a summary notice of the exegetical literature, mingling all<br />

together, would be inexpedient. “4 3<br />

Although he never wrote a commentary on Revelation, w that<br />

master theologian and exegete Benjamin B. Warfield proffered the<br />

following observation regarding the book: “The boldness of its symbolism<br />

makes it the most dificult book of the Bible: it has always<br />

been the most variously understood, the most arbitrarily interpreted,<br />

the most exegetically tortured.”4 5<br />

Milton Terry in his 1911 classic,<br />

Biblical He-rm.eneutics (which is still widely employed in seminaries<br />

today), noted that “no portion of the Holy Scriptures has been the<br />

subject of so much controversy and of so many varying interpretations<br />

as the Apocalypse of John.”% Eminent church historian Philip<br />

Schaff cautioned that “no book has been more misunderstood and<br />

abused; none calls for greater modesty and reserve in interpretation.<br />

“4 7<br />

Swete agreed:<br />

To comment on this great prophecy is a harder task than to comment<br />

on a Gospel, and he who undertakes it exposes himself to the charge<br />

of presumption. I have been led to venture upon what I know to be<br />

dangerous ground. . . .<br />

. . . .<br />

The challenge [to unravel the Revelation] was accepted almost from<br />

the first, but with results which shew by their wide divergence the<br />

dilliculties of the task. Schools of Apocalyptic interpretation have<br />

arisen, varying not only in detail, but in principle.w<br />

Isbon T. Beckwith has suggested that Revelation probably stands<br />

without parallel in this regard throughout all range of literature: “No<br />

43. Eduard Wilhelm Eugen Reuss, History of the Sacred Scri@mJ of th New Testammt<br />

(Edinburgh: T.& T. Clark, 1884), p. 155.<br />

44. He did write several important theological treatises on various aspects of Revelation<br />

and Revelation studies, such as his entry under “Revelation” in Philip Schti, cd., A<br />

Religious Emyclofiediu: Or Dictionmy of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Pra&al Theolo~<br />

(New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1883), vol. 3; his “The Apocalypse” (1886); “The<br />

Millennium and the Apocalypse” (1904); etc.<br />

45. Wartield, “Revelation,” in Scha~ Er@opedza 3:2034.<br />

46. Milton S. Terry, Biblical Herm.meutws (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, [1911] 1974),<br />

p. 466.<br />

47. Schaff, Htstoy 1:826.<br />

48. Swete, Revelation, pp. xii, ccvii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!